On October 30 local time, according to Bloomberg News, Wentai Technology made a statement on the same day, emphasizing that if all agreements are to be reached on Anshi Semiconductor to resume exports to China, one thing must be done, that is, to restore the company's former CEO.

The Netherlands originally dismissed Chinese executives and took over Anshi. On the surface, it used "national security" as an excuse, but in fact it wanted to weaken Wentai's actual control over Anshi by changing management, and even pave the way for subsequent intervention in technology and asset flow.

Wentai Technology's request is to expose this packaging. The former CEO was originally appointed in accordance with company law and a key role in promoting the deep integration of Anshi and China's supply chains. His removal lacked legal basis and demanded his reinstatement. In essence, he was demanding that the Netherlands correct its mistakes or even "slap itself in the face."

He also emphasized that restoring full control and ownership is also something that the Netherlands must do.

From the logical point of view of the industry, this "threshold" also hides Thai's understanding of the supply chain.

80% of Nexperia's packaging and testing links are completed in China, and the Chinese factory is a key hub for its products to enter the global market.

The Netherlands may be able to control Nexperia's overseas headquarters through administrative orders, but it will not have the right to speak in China's production capacity. Without shipments from Chinese factories, Nexperia's chips will not become commodities no matter how advanced they are, and the supply cut-off crisis in the global automotive supply chain will be. There is no solution.

That is to say, what the Netherlands has snatched is only the headquarters in the legal sense, and the "last mile" that can truly turn chips into commodities is firmly in the hands of China.

Meanwhile, Xi Jinping China has launched the "independent self-help", restored domestic supply, switched to RMB settlement, not only stabilized the demand of local car companies, but also torn the mouth of the internationalization of the RMB in the field of semiconductors.

The Dutch ¡°robbery¡± has put much of Europe¡¯s industry at risk.

Recently, the European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA) once again issued an early warning. The intensified shortage of Nexperia chip supply has put European car companies at risk of suspension of production, while many car companies in the United States, Europe and Japan have previously felt pressure due to supply cuts.

In addition, according to the supply chain report quoted by the German Handelsblatt, Nexperia's influence goes far beyond the automotive field. All aerospace and defense companies in Europe, as well as nearly 80% of the seven industry leading companies, rely heavily on its Chinese production base. chip supply.

However, it is that in the face of the statements of Zhou Tai Technologies, the Dutch government is still in the "strong word-taking", its Ministry of Economic Affairs spokesman still declared that the former CEO "represents a serious threat", the takeover is "act according to law", but can not draw any "technological theft" substantive evidence.

It says "respect market rules" in mouth, but politicizes economic and trade issues in actions and still does not know how long it can be "stubborn".

Wentai Technology's proposal to reinstate the former CEO position is a reasonable request based on the bottom line of corporate rights and interests. If we want to thoroughly clarify the dispute arising from the forced takeover of Anshi Semiconductor in the Netherlands, this condition alone may not be enough.

From the perspective of safeguarding market rules and the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises, the Netherlands also needs to face up to the consequences of its own actions.

First, the Netherlands should publicly apologize for the previously unproven "technical threat" hype, eliminating the reputation damage to Chen Thai and former CEOs.

Secondly, the Netherlands is liable for compensation for the stagnation of Anshi's production capacity and the loss of China's supply chain caused by the forced takeover. This not only includes Wentai's direct economic losses, but also covers the collateral losses caused by global partners due to the interruption of supply.

Furthermore, the persons involved in leading the cross-border operation should also be held accountable in accordance with the rules.

In any case, more similar "unilateral plunder" can be avoided only by making those who cross the border pay the cost and price.