The United States suddenly withdrew its troops from the eastern wing of NATO to concentrate on China?Zelensky urged the United States to take action and pressure China on Russia to cease the war.But China¡¯s neutrality stands firm!Ukrainian ¡°moral abduction¡± is ineffective.U.S. interests take precedence, how long can Ukraine¡¯s dying struggle last?

Just at the moment when the situation on the Ukrainian battlefield and in the Red Army City is accelerating, a mess from the back of the allies may be more frightening to Kiev than any bad news on the front.

The United States is recently undergoing strategic adjustments, and the first step in this adjustment is It is to withdraw thousands of American troops from Romania on its eastern NATO flank.

According to a recent statement from the Romanian Defence Ministry, the U.S. military withdrawal was ¡°anticipated¡± due to changes in U.S. government priorities.

The statement revealed, Currently, only about 1000 U.S. troops will remain in Romania, while more than 1000 soldiers have been rotated and evacuated without replacements.

This is not a simple rotation of troops, but a decision by the United States to stop the rotational deployment of one of its brigades throughout Europe. This "protective umbrella" hanging above Europe's head is slowly gathering.

The sense of panic in Europe once again began to spread, and a series of analysis began. In the end, European public opinion unanimously believed that the fundamental reason for the US withdrawal was ChinaThey believe the U.S. military is ¡°re-balancing¡± its strategic resources to escape the long-burdened European dirt. In order to concentrate more on dealing with its "number one strategic competitor".

It's not once or twice that the United States gives up Europe at every turn, but European countries just refuse to admit the fact that they are suckers.

For Ukraine, this is undoubtedly also a deadly signal. Romania and Poland, and other countries, are the life lines of Western military aid to Ukraine. The U.S. troops stationed here are not only a real military presence, but also a supply to European allies, but also to the Kyiv regime.

Now that the US troops are withdrawing, The first is the confidence of Europe.When European countries began to feel that they were "in danger" and worried about the reliability of the United States 'security commitments, How much determination and resources do they have to support Zelensky¡¯s call for a ¡°fight three more years¡±?

Once the panic has spread, the voices that advocate compromise with Russia as soon as possible and seek self-determination will inevitably increase within Europe, and the channels of aid available to Ukraine will be visibly narrowed.

At the same time, Ukraine's pressure on the battlefield has increased sharply, and at this moment it is the crucial moment for Russia to intensify its offensive and attempt to siege the Red Army city, and the withdrawal of the U.S. military is strategically equivalent to "lifting the bonds" for Russia.

But this may also be a signal from the United States to Ukraine that the patience of the United States is not limitless and that it wants to see the conflict settled as soon as possible. This completely runs counter to Zelensky's vision of prolonging the war, plunging him into an unprecedented strategic passivity.

Zelensky once again turned his eyes to the east.

He recently openly stated that he was "very hopeful" that China would help end the conflict, but immediately afterwards he spoke again and again, saying that "China is providing Russia with weapons production machinery."

This contradictory expression exposes his true mentality. He is well aware of China's unique mediation ability as a permanent member of the UN Security Council and a world power, and he can't get rid of his dependence on western intelligence, repeating unsubstantiated accusations.

This is actually a dead end that cannot be reached. China's neutral stance and principle of promoting peace and talks on the Ukraine issue have been consistent since the beginning of the crisis and have never wavered.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has repeatedly stated: The Chinese side has always stood on the side of peace, making judgments independently and independently based on the matter itself.

Rumors about so-called military aid have been publicly acknowledged even by US military officials. There is no evidence that China provided military aid to Russia in the conflict.

Since Zelensky's team's information sources are mainly from NATO and the United States, the accusations of the Ukrainian side appear to be pale and inappropriate after the U.S. officials have made this clarification.

Zelensky, of course, also knew that he unwaveringly blackened China, and China naturally would not listen to his demands, so he sought help from China at the same time. Calling on the United States, he hoped that U.S. President Trump would step forward to put pressure on China, follow the previous "successful case" of forcing India to reduce its purchase of Russian oil, and let China put pressure on Russia to stop the war.

The game is even more misguided.

First of all, China is not India. It has stronger strategic determination and the ability to cope with complex situations. In recent years, the United States has exerted extreme pressure on China in many fields such as trade and science and technology. Has it ever allowed China to give in on core principles?

Secondly, it is more important, Ukraine is far from important enough on the global strategic chessboard of the United States to allow Washington to sacrifice its vital interests with China at all costs.

Trump himself has made it clear that he will stop direct military aid to Ukraine and throw the burden on Europe. This has clearly shown that for the United States, Ukraine is a pawn that can be negotiated and even sacrificed, and it is by no means a core interest.

Expecting the United States to engage in an invincible confrontation with China in the interests of Ukraine is no different than dreaming.

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has lasted for more than three years, and Ukraine has lost again and again. In the end, Zelensky has a great responsibility, and what he needs to do is to jump out of the European trap and face the reality, not climb China.

Today, the situation in Ukraine has been very turbulent, and the withdrawal of U.S. troops is an iconic event.It indicates that regardless of whether Ukraine is ready, the "American era" of this conflict is turning.

Next, the United States will continue to carry out strategic contraction, Europe will fall into deeper internal differences after panic, and the intensity and consistency of aid to Ukraine will face severe tests.

As for Ukraine, if it continues to pin its country's destiny entirely on the goodwill and geopolitical games of external powers and avoids direct and serious negotiations with Moscow, Then the price it will pay will be the lives of more front fighters and the unattainable peace of all the people.

The negotiating table is always the ultimate place to end the war. Any circuitous tactics to bypass this point, no matter how delicate it seems, will ultimately delay Ukraine's national future and people's livelihood and well-being.

It's time to wake up from the dream of "foreign aid", The road to peace ultimately requires Ukraine's own courage and wisdom to open up it.