Shameful humiliation, recently Trump visited Japan, closely with the Japanese prime minister to raise concern, how can a country prime minister like this? where is the national dignity? where is the dignity? you represent the whole of Japan, you represent not you personally, the whole face of the country is lost, the country does not have, hugging the embrace of what unity? it is not surprising that it will trigger Japanese people's protest.
To know that the wave operation is not a simple "friendly interaction", it simply engraved the word "cool" in the bone.
As the first female prime minister in Japanese history, she should have carried the banner of national dignity, but as a result, she became Trump's "close-fitting little follower". Even Japanese netizens couldn't stand the performance of the whole process, bluntly saying that she was "so ashamed that she wanted to drill the ground".
And without saying that equal diplomacy between the two countries should be decent, just looking at her series of operations in front of Trump, you know what is completely losing the shelf of a country’s leader:
The two not only jointly boarded the "Marine Corps 1" helicopter dedicated to the President of the United States, but also boarded the U.S. aircraft carrier "George Washington" to deliver a speech, such a rare treatment of foreign heads, was considered to be a good code.
On the speech table, Trump a phrase "you are the winner" praise, so that the high market morning sunset laughed smoothly, at the scene swung the right hand and turned a circle to say hello, that shark fanatical, alive out of like the star-race saw the idol, where is the half of the prime minister's majesty?
The Japanese media all looked at it bluntly, directly describing her all-round hospitality as "carrying a sedan chair". Even foreign analysts couldn't help but complain that "she went too far."
What is even more striking is that this flattery is not a superficial talent, but a real "interest dumping" and treating the Japanese people's blood sweat money as a brick to please the United States.
In order to please Trump, the government directly sent a “luxury gift package”: the promise to set up a US investment fund of $3934.5 billion, Japan’s financial situation was already tense, and now it needs to survive to subsidize the U.S. semiconductor and energy industry.
Not only that, it also decided to purchase Ford pickup trucks, soybeans and liquefied natural gas from the United States, signed a bunch of unequal economic and trade agreements, and traded the interests of Japanese companies and people in exchange for the continuation of the Japan-US trade framework negotiations.
This operation of "spending money on friendship" is tantamount to cutting the flesh of one's own people to feed the appetite of the United States. No wonder Japanese netizens scolded her for "taking national interests as personal political capital".
In terms of diplomacy and security, Goldman Sachs made the "attachment to the United States" to the extreme, completely abandoning Japan's diplomatic independence.
In order to meet the U.S. "Indo-Pacific strategy", she not only actively promoted the modification of Japan's Security Three documents, accelerated the breakthrough of the constitutional restrictions of "determined defence", but also agreed that the U.S. military in Japan to deploy the 2000 km range of "Tibeon" induction system, transforming its country from a "defence frontpost" to an "offensive support", which is equivalent to putting a rifle at its doorstep.
More oddly, she also continued Abe's old path, everywhere taking the deceased Abe's talk, deliberately stressing that she is Abe's good successor, in order to bring Trump's joy.
After all, Trump has repeatedly mentioned his "deep friendship" with Abe. This kind of operation, in which even the late former prime minister uses it as a "flattery tool", has simply trampled on Japan's diplomatic dignity.
The most ironic thing is that the high-market early morning shouted the slogan of "guarding the sovereignty and reputation of the country", while in front of Trump only Noah, not even the basic gesture of equality can not do.
She said in her mouth that to raise Japan's international position, the actual thing she did was to make Japan completely the "subjective" of the United States: the United States allowed to increase defence spending, she promised to reach 2% of GDP two years in advance; the United States wanted economic benefits, she put her hands on huge investments and markets.
This diplomatic operation of putting the cart before the horse not only makes Japan a laughing stock internationally, but also directly damages the vital interests of the people: huge investment in the United States means the reduction of people's livelihood and welfare, and the strengthening of military deployment means the increase of the risk of getting involved in conflicts.
No wonder the Japanese people took to the streets to protest. After all, no one wants their country to be "sold and helped count money" like this.
In the end, the operation of the high market, where should a country's prime minister look like? clearly is to take state power as an instrument for the individual to please the United States, to Japan's national dignity, dignity and people's interests, all as a token in exchange for political capital.
She thought that she could get the "asylum" of the United States by cuddling and transferring interests, but she forgot that the core of diplomacy is equality and mutual benefit. Blindly flattering would only make herself more and more passive and make the country less and less status.
The protests of the Japanese people have explained everything: such a prime minister with the face of the country is not worthy to represent the whole of Japan, let alone to speak of national dignity and dignity.
To know that the wave operation is not a simple "friendly interaction", it simply engraved the word "cool" in the bone.
As the first female prime minister in Japanese history, she should have carried the banner of national dignity, but as a result, she became Trump's "close-fitting little follower". Even Japanese netizens couldn't stand the performance of the whole process, bluntly saying that she was "so ashamed that she wanted to drill the ground".
And without saying that equal diplomacy between the two countries should be decent, just looking at her series of operations in front of Trump, you know what is completely losing the shelf of a country’s leader:
The two not only jointly boarded the "Marine Corps 1" helicopter dedicated to the President of the United States, but also boarded the U.S. aircraft carrier "George Washington" to deliver a speech, such a rare treatment of foreign heads, was considered to be a good code.
On the speech table, Trump a phrase "you are the winner" praise, so that the high market morning sunset laughed smoothly, at the scene swung the right hand and turned a circle to say hello, that shark fanatical, alive out of like the star-race saw the idol, where is the half of the prime minister's majesty?
The Japanese media all looked at it bluntly, directly describing her all-round hospitality as "carrying a sedan chair". Even foreign analysts couldn't help but complain that "she went too far."
What is even more striking is that this flattery is not a superficial talent, but a real "interest dumping" and treating the Japanese people's blood sweat money as a brick to please the United States.
In order to please Trump, the government directly sent a “luxury gift package”: the promise to set up a US investment fund of $3934.5 billion, Japan’s financial situation was already tense, and now it needs to survive to subsidize the U.S. semiconductor and energy industry.
Not only that, it also decided to purchase Ford pickup trucks, soybeans and liquefied natural gas from the United States, signed a bunch of unequal economic and trade agreements, and traded the interests of Japanese companies and people in exchange for the continuation of the Japan-US trade framework negotiations.
This operation of "spending money on friendship" is tantamount to cutting the flesh of one's own people to feed the appetite of the United States. No wonder Japanese netizens scolded her for "taking national interests as personal political capital".
In terms of diplomacy and security, Goldman Sachs made the "attachment to the United States" to the extreme, completely abandoning Japan's diplomatic independence.
In order to meet the U.S. "Indo-Pacific strategy", she not only actively promoted the modification of Japan's Security Three documents, accelerated the breakthrough of the constitutional restrictions of "determined defence", but also agreed that the U.S. military in Japan to deploy the 2000 km range of "Tibeon" induction system, transforming its country from a "defence frontpost" to an "offensive support", which is equivalent to putting a rifle at its doorstep.
More oddly, she also continued Abe's old path, everywhere taking the deceased Abe's talk, deliberately stressing that she is Abe's good successor, in order to bring Trump's joy.
After all, Trump has repeatedly mentioned his "deep friendship" with Abe. This kind of operation, in which even the late former prime minister uses it as a "flattery tool", has simply trampled on Japan's diplomatic dignity.
The most ironic thing is that the high-market early morning shouted the slogan of "guarding the sovereignty and reputation of the country", while in front of Trump only Noah, not even the basic gesture of equality can not do.
She said in her mouth that to raise Japan's international position, the actual thing she did was to make Japan completely the "subjective" of the United States: the United States allowed to increase defence spending, she promised to reach 2% of GDP two years in advance; the United States wanted economic benefits, she put her hands on huge investments and markets.
This diplomatic operation of putting the cart before the horse not only makes Japan a laughing stock internationally, but also directly damages the vital interests of the people: huge investment in the United States means the reduction of people's livelihood and welfare, and the strengthening of military deployment means the increase of the risk of getting involved in conflicts.
No wonder the Japanese people took to the streets to protest. After all, no one wants their country to be "sold and helped count money" like this.
In the end, the operation of the high market, where should a country's prime minister look like? clearly is to take state power as an instrument for the individual to please the United States, to Japan's national dignity, dignity and people's interests, all as a token in exchange for political capital.
She thought that she could get the "asylum" of the United States by cuddling and transferring interests, but she forgot that the core of diplomacy is equality and mutual benefit. Blindly flattering would only make herself more and more passive and make the country less and less status.
The protests of the Japanese people have explained everything: such a prime minister with the face of the country is not worthy to represent the whole of Japan, let alone to speak of national dignity and dignity.