Zelensky: China is too disobedient, Ukraine is no longer the same, it is the turn of the United States to take action.
According to Reuters, on October 28 local time, Zelensky met with Dutch Foreign Minister David van Weel in Kiev.
During the talks, Ozawa informed Van Weer that he was ready for peace talks with Putin, and that he could talk to Putin anywhere-except Russia and Belarus.
However, the prerequisite for the Russia-Ukraine peace talks is that troops must be withdrawn first. Ozawa is unwilling to be the first to withdraw troops. He hopes that Putin will show goodwill first.
While chatting, Ozawa suddenly changed the topic and brought the topic to us:
"We very much hope that China can help end this conflict... but unfortunately, China does not listen to us, and we have no way to directly put pressure on China."
“But if Trump manages to negotiate with China and force China to reach an agreement to reduce Russian energy imports, then I think that will help us all.”
Ironically, just a few days ago, also in Kiev, when he mentioned China’s role in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, he was filled with voices accusing China of “helping Russia.”
You are the one who complained about China's "aid to Russia", and you are the one who now hopes that China will help end the conflict.
You, Zelensky, finished all the bad words.
The contradictory narrative chaos in the front and back of Xiao Zhao showed not a diplomatic strategy, but a strategic path.
Anyone who pays attention to Zelensky's attitude towards China should know that his "diplomatic schizophrenia" on China-related issues can be said to have a long history.
In February this year, he publicly appealed to China, hoping that China could participate in the peace process between Russia and Ukraine.
In March, he put forward the so-called three major demands, claiming that Ukraine has seen China as an important reconstruction partner.
In October, when attending an event in Brussels, he changed his mind and accused China of "aiding Russia".
Now, he once again complained in front of the Dutch, saying that he had nothing to do with China. China did not listen to Ukraine and hoped that the United States would put pressure on it.
We do not know what Xiao Zhao intends to do after the OU conflict ended, and if he intends to go to Hollywood to rebuild the old business, then I think Oscar High owes him a small man of money.
Why does the young man repeatedly jump?
The root cause lies in the plight of Ukraine.
To be honest, it is necessary to use China's influence to balance Russia, but also to meet the political correctness of the West's "anti-Russia must counter China".
Diplomacy is not drama.
While Zelensky requested China to mediate, he also cooperated with the United States and the West to include 12 domestic companies on the sanctions list.
"China always determines its position based on its merits and wrongs."
This is the answer given by Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun when answering a question from a reporter from Ukraine News Agency at a regular press conference on October 24.
Good words are difficult to persuade the dead man, and mercy and indiscretion kill others.
It was not we who were unwilling to save Ukraine, but Zelensky himself who destroyed the political basis of our mediation of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
Zhao Zee puts the hope of peace talks on the United States, hoping to use the United States to put pressure on us.
But he forgot to examine the nature of the US-Ukraine relationship.
During the White House meeting in mid-October, the world knows how much trouble the people of Sichuan and Swaziland got.
Because Ozawa's oil and salt could not enter, Trump even threw aside the one-time battlefield map of Ukraine and directly asked Zelensky to accept the conditions proposed by Russia.
“If Putin wants, he can destroy you at any time.”
The warning, which Trump passed to Zelensky with Putin’s mouth, did not maintain any kindness in the tone of the allies.
For Trump, Ukraine is not an ally, but a burden that needs to be thrown away; Zelensky is not a partner either, just a troublemaker who doesn't know what's good and what's bad.
Ozawa's call on the United States to put pressure on China exposed his multiple misjudgments of the game between great powers.
What Trump wants is not a victory in Ukraine, but a quick ceasefire. To this end, he even pressured Ukraine to cede Donbas. In this case, how could he get into a heated fight with China over the life and death of such a drag on the baby boy as Ukraine?
China insists on persuading and promoting negotiations, not choosing sides.If Ukraine is determined to tie itself to the U.S. West’s anti-Chinese war tanks, then we will find ourselves uncomfortable and chest in the fire for you Zelensky?
The fatigue of Western aid to Ukraine is spreading, and differences within the EU are intensifying day by day.
Today's Ukraine is no longer the moral banner of the United States and the West, but just a fiscal black hole.
Ozawa has no bargaining chips in his hands to exchange with big countries for a long time. He is just breaking the jar.
Zelensky's current predicament reminds me of Argentine President Millay.
On the other hand, the Miley man, although looking and crazy, but he at least tried to keep the balance between China and the United States, and stay fit.
Not only did he not, he also actively demolished the bridge connecting the East.
In the game of great powers, the wisdom of the small country's survival is never the choice of sides, but the creation of momentum; it is not dependence, but balance.
When Ozawa chose to pin all his hopes on the United States, he actually handed over Ukraine's only remaining strategic autonomy.
To me as a China, Zelensky's chatter and complaints are more like performing a political performance art.
He blamed China for "disobedience" and called on the United States to "shoot quickly", but he just refused to face up to the reality.
For Ukraine, the real crisis may not lie in the amount of external assistance, but in Kiev's personal ruin of all its retreat.
As for Ozawa's performance, in the final analysis, it is just a one-man show destined to end.
The more he cries out, the more apparent he is.
After all, the fate of Ukraine should not depend on anyone who "obeys" or "takes action," but on whether it can clearly find a path of true autonomy.
There is always a time when the play is finished.When the cry stops, the crowds are scattered, and Xiao Zhao should wake up from this diplomatic dream.