Preliminary
“Over ten thousand Ukrainian soldiers are surrounded by the Russian army!” the Russian president approached the command and listened to the report of Chief of Staff General Grazimov.
What is even more shocking is that Ukraine President Zelensky suddenly turned the blame on China at the critical moment of the war. Questioning China's "assistance" to Russia.When the battlefield is defeated, China wants to drop the pot。
Gerasimov's report made the situation on the battlefield clear: The Ukrainian army was encircled in two critical areas, one in Kharkov, Kupiyansk, with more than 5,000 Ukrainian soldiers trapped, and the other, more critical, in the direction of the Red Army City in Donetsk, with more than 5,000 Ukrainian soldiers encircled.
These two places are not only strategic areas, but also the core areas of Russian-Ukrainian battles.
Zelensky himself had to admit that the situation was quite serious.
The fighting in the Donbas area has become increasingly fierce. The Red Army's exchanges of fire inside and outside the city have become routine, and logistical support has also become tense. He said that although the Ukrainian army's resistance in the region is tenacious, Ukraine's strength is close to its limit.
If more than 10,000 elite troops are completely lost, Ukraine's combat power will be greatly reduced. The collapse of the Donbas defense line means that the Russian army's next attack will be more rapid and may even approach Kiev.
In this case, Zelensky naturally felt tremendous pressure. Ukrainian soldiers were lacking, and there were not much left of the armed forces, and more of them were the old, weak and disabled soldiers who were temporarily assembled.
This has compelled people to regret that the cruelty of the war has left neither side a choice to retreat.
However, at an increasingly severe moment, Zelensky pointed his head to China.
In an interview with Brussels, he suddenly threw out a sentence: If China had not provided assistance to Russia, Russia would not have been able to hold on, and the Ukrainian army would not have fallen into today's predicament.
What is even more surprising is that he also said similar things at the United Nations General Assembly, believing that "without China, Russia is nothing." These words were confusing for a moment.
In fact, Zelensky's remarks are completely groundless. First of all, although China and Russia have close economic relations, especially under the pressure of sanctions, China has indeed helped Russia alleviate some difficulties, especially providing support in people's livelihood materials and technological products. But this does not mean that China directly supports Russia in the war.
China hasined a neutral stance and has never supplied weapons to any of the parties to the conflict, nor has it been involved in any direct military conflict.
Even civilian drones are not allowed to be exported to Russia or Ukraine, which is clearly contrary to “help Russia.”
In fact, China has always advocated peaceful settlement of conflicts, and has repeatedly called for a ceasefire and promoted negotiations.
If we look from a neutral standpoint, China does not violate any international law, either against Russia or Ukraine.
Economic exchanges between China and Russia are part of the globalized economy and cannot simply be seen as a move to support war.
Zelensky's practice of "throwing the pot" is obviously not without reason.
First, he needs to prepare for the huge battle defeat that Ukraine is about to face. As soon as the news that the Ukrainian army was under siege came out, the morale of Ukraine would inevitably be affected.
Especially in a situation where the soldiers are already in the elbow, the loss of more than a thousand skilled troops means that Ukraine will not be able to continue to support the front line of defense, and even the codes for negotiations with Russia will be lost.
Therefore, Zelensky chose to point his head to the outside, trying to shift the pressure at home.
By blaming China, he can not only shift the blame to external factors and avoid people from questioning his handling of the war, but also use it to put pressure on Western countries to take more restrictive measures against China, thereby weakening Russia's combat effectiveness.
In this way, he hopes to force China to reduce trade cooperation with Russia, thus weakening Russia's economic foundation and winning more support for Ukraine.
Although this political calculation seems smart, it actually ignores a key point: China's international status and economic strength are beyond the influence of Ukraine.
The war lasted three years, and the people of both sides paid a terrible price for it.
Zelensky did not learn any lessons from it. He never considered why the war started. When he lost, he only wanted to find other countries to blame him.
Trying to use this method to gain international support from the United States and the West.
China has always held a clear position: it has never agreed to resolve disputes by force, the two sides should sit down and talk, and it is much less likely to provide any weapons to Russia, while Zelensky, in the absence of any evidence, blatantly throwing the pot, proves more of his inner helplessness.
There are no winners in the war, only losers, the people are ruthlessly destroyed, and the national resources are constantly consumed.
If Zelensky really understood this, he should try his best to hold peace talks and promote a ceasefire. Instead of making random accusations and gaining sympathy. Only through dialogue can the people's society be reborn.