After 18 days of silence, Netanyahu finally "couldn't pretend" and reignited the war, catching "peace ambassador" Trump off guard.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu once again ordered open fire on Gaza on the grounds that Hamas violated the ceasefire agreement. It was only 18 days after Trump's proud "Gaza Ceasefire Agreement" came into effect. In fact, even this short 18-day "ceasefire period" has always been accompanied by gunfire. Israel and Hamas accuse each other of violating the ceasefire agreement. Anyone can tell The so-called "ceasefire" has long existed in name only. Only the United States is still stubborn, insisting that the ceasefire in Gaza "is still in effect."¡£

Israel repeatedly violates rules and exposes greater ambitions

To resume the war, Israel may have long plotted, appears to be a response to Hamas' "violation of the ceasefire agreement", which actually exposes its own. Ambition to try to solidify the results of the war and expand actual control¡£

The most intuitive example is that under the ceasefire agreement, the Israeli army should have retreated to the ¡°yellow line¡± and controlled only 53 percent of the area of Gaza, but recent military operations show that Israel is trying to break that limitation.

This "gradual occupation" strategy is highly similar to the country's historical pattern of territorial encroachment-gradually compressing the living space of Palestinians by creating hype of "security threats".

According to Pakistani statistics, after the ceasefire agreement came into force, the Israeli army violated the ceasefire 125 times, including cross-border shootings, bombing houses and arresting civilians, which not only undermined the basis of the ceasefire, but also created excuses for subsequent military operations.

As the main promoter of Israel's military action, Netanyahu's government's choice has a distinct domestic political imprint.

On the one hand, far-right calls for greater control over Gaza and the West Bank are growing, and any implementation of a ceasefire could be seen as a compromise on the ¡°two-state solution.¡±

By creating an escalation of conflict, Netanyahu has both reassured his hard-fought allies and shifted internal contradictions to external threats.

On the other hand, the continued state of war has become a political tool for its avoidance of corruption trials, and the special powers of the wartime government enable it to freeze judicial proceedings, which is also a consistent approach to Netanyahu¡¯s ¡°delaying trial.¡±

Most importantly, for Israel, who loves ¡°military adventure,¡± the current state of the Palestinian resistance is very weak, and by actively breaking the ceasefire, Israel is trying to further marginalize Hamas and even create conditions for its future complete expulsion from Gaza.

This ¡°weakness¡± tactic, Rather than a response to Hamas¡¯s breach of contract, this is a consistent radical practice of the country.¡£

U.S. cessation of fire is a joke.

Of course, Israel is not without risk. One of the biggest uncertainties is that it will offend Trump¡£

As we all know, Trump says to everyone that he has "mediated" many wars, the only one that can be traced is the ceasefire agreement in Gaza.

What Israel is now doing is stepping down Trump¡¯s few positive diplomatic achievements, not excluding that he will therefore express his ¡°disappointment¡± with Netanyahu.

However, what has led to Israel¡¯s deliberate deception is precisely the American embellishment, the so-called Trump ceasefire agreement, in fact, and the laughter of the international community.

The simplest example is that U.S. officials are still insisting that the ceasefire is still in effect, but ignore 125 Israeli violations.

This paranoia is not a coincidence, but an inevitable result of U.S. policy in the Middle East, where Washington sees Israel as a ¡°strategic asset,¡± even in the so-called ¡°peace process,¡± allowing Israel to maintain military deterrence.

When Israel launched an attack on the grounds of "Hamas breach of contract", the United States not only failed to impose effective restraints, but instead coordinated plans with Israel to expand the scope of control. This acquiescence is tantamount to condoning the breach of contract.

In order to safeguard Trump¡¯s outward performance, the United States on the one hand pressured Israel to maintain restraint, on the other hand promised its military readiness; on the other hand, demanded that Hamas return the remains of detainees, and on the other hand, ignored Israeli ongoing attacks on civilian areas.

This contradictory position essentially uses the ceasefire agreement as a political performance prop rather than a sincere peace effort. When the agreement broke down 18 days after its signing, the so-called "diplomatic achievements" instantly went up in smoke.

Furthermore, Israel continues to fight. Although it is not conducive to safeguarding Trump's diplomatic achievements, it is beneficial to the interests of some American interest groups¡£

Gaza's suffering meets U.S. needs

The humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza continues to worsen, but it is precisely in line with the deep interests of the United States in the Middle East. U.S. achieves multiple strategic goals byining ¡°controllable turmoil¡± in the Palestinian issue¡£

First, the ongoing conflict in Gaza provided the United States with tools to differentiate the Arab world, and when the international community focused on the Gaza tragedy, the United States was able to shift its criticism of its support for Israel¡¯s expansion policy;

When the Palestinians are busy struggling for survival, it is more difficult for Arab countries to form a unified anti-Israel front. This strategy of "checking and balancing with chaos" allows the United States to continue to maintain its dominant position in the Middle East while weakening the cohesion of regional countries.

Secondly, tensions in Gaza have directly stimulated U.S. arms exports. Data show that U.S. foreign arms sales last year hit a new high of US$318.7 billion, of which the Middle East accounted for a significant proportion.

As a major weapons recipient, Israel's military actions have objectively verified the "effectiveness" of US-made weapons, thus prompting other countries to follow up and purchase them.

This cycle of ¡°war-arm-sale-re-war¡± has made the Pentagon and military-industrial enterprises a community of interests, and the blood of Gaza¡¯s civilians has become the hidden cost of operating this chain.

Finally, the United States has created a false image of a "peace promoter" by manipulating the ceasefire agreement process.

Even after the agreement breaks down, Washington can still blame Hamas's "non-cooperation", thus avoiding its own responsibility.

This manipulation of speech both upholds the ethical height of the United States in the international public opinion field and provides a reasonable basis for its continued arming of Israel, where the suffering of the people of Gaza is reduced to ¡°the inevitable cost of regional conflict,¡± masking the key impact of U.S. policy.