On October 28, local time, Britain's Prime Minister Stammer's latest statement allowed the seven-year delay in the Chinese embassy's new building dispute to escalate again.

In the face of China's dissatisfaction with the unsuccessful delay in approval, Stammer not only regretted, but also firmly claimed that "not due to external pressure to approve the project", in the words are targeting China.

This is not over yet. He immediately threw an irrelevant request to China, that is, to stop buying Russian oil.

This kind of "picking things up" is not an improvised idea, but a consistent operation of the Starmer government in the near future.

Just in the middle of this month, the British side added 11 China companies to the Russia-related sanctions list without any basis. In addition, Stammer also said that he had a phone conversation with Trump two days ago and discussed "how to put pressure on China." Its sinister intentions are self-evident.

The case of the new Chinese embassy in the UK dates back to 2018, when China invested £2.5 billion ($2.3 billion) to buy the old site of the former royal casting factory near the Tower of London.

This land, which has been vacant for more than 30 years, is planned as the largest diplomatic premises in Europe.

At the time, the British government also explicitly agreed to the purchase of land, and the design proposals submitted by the Chinese side were also fully in line with the British construction planning policy, and also received high recognition by local professional institutions, from compliance to technical level.

But this application for the construction of a new embassy, which should be reasonably advanced, opened a seven-year "approval marathon".

In the past seven years, the reasons for the British side's delay have changed one after another, from "destroying historical features" to hyping "espionage risks", and even "anti-China" elements fabricated some unwarranted rumors.

During this period, the China Embassy in the UK also clarified many times, submitted application materials, and responded completely to all questions. The so-called "security risks" were purely nonsense, but the British side always "pretended to be confused."

In August this year, the British side had already delayed the decision to October 21, now to October, and again delayed the decision to December 10, the so-called "normal procedure" has long become an excuse for delaying, in essence is to "dry up" with China.

Now, it is simply linking the project to the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and Russian-related sanctions, and almost simply treating the infrastructure project as a ¡°political code¡±.

However, Stammer's sudden tough statements, there is an estimated reason behind it.

Not long ago, British prosecutors dropped charges against two British men charged with "China spies" in 2023 due to lack of evidence.

However, this result quickly gave the Conservative Party a handle, violently criticizing the Stammer government for being "weak on China" and even claiming that it withdrew the case because it was "afraid of angering China and damaging the economy."

Although Stammer denied the accusations and blamed the previous government for the delay in updating laws, domestic political pressure made him urgently need to show "tough" on China issues, and the long-delayed China Embassy project just became his tool to brush up "tough" people.

In addition, the shadow of the United States is also behind the dispute.It is that the White House has warned Britain not to approve the Chinese project, and even Trump has personally urged Stammer to reject the Chinese application.

In the large context of the Sino-American game, Britain is also estimated to be "loyal" to the United States due to China's hardness.

In any case, seven years of waiting has already exhausted China's patience, and China has issued a solemn warning that the British side's practice without contractual spirit is completely contrary to its attitude of improving Sino-British relations. If it continues, the consequences will eventually be borne by the British side itself.

Stamer's unreasonable demands on China are even more absurd. We advise the British side to take care of itself, correct its mistakes immediately, and stop "provoking trouble". Otherwise, when the conflict completely intensifies, it will be too late to turn back.