Source: No. 10, Huanshi Privy Council
American nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Nimitz26After the loss of two shipping aircraft in the South China Sea, the day has dropped toward the U.S. mainland. but for why it would be very rare in30Plane crashes occurred one after another within minutes, and there were mixed speculations. Conspiracy theories on social media in the United States speculated that the aircraft carrier "may have been attacked by electronic warfare or invaded by the network", but US President Trump ruled out the possibility of man-made sabotage and said that the cause of the crash "may be inferior fuel".
But this also means that the problem of exposure to the "Nimez" crashes two aircraft, probably greater.
Regarding the two consecutive crashes of the Nimitz, U.S. social media is full of conspiracy theories that the U.S. aircraft carrier may have suffered a "mysterious attack." Some people even blatantly blamed the reason on China: the two carrier-based aircraft may have been attacked by some kind of electronic warfare or directed energy weapon, or were hacked by a network, causing the aircraft to malfunction and crash-as for who did it? "Only China nearby has such capabilities."
Newsweek27Don't forget to add fuel to the fire. According to the report, John Hemings, deputy director of geopolitics at the Geostrategy Council, a British think tank, said: "Although it is too early to judge the cause of the crashes of the two planes, it is necessary to consider the possibility that the two planes were shot down in a short period of time in an environment of fierce geostrategic competition." Dan Rice, a former assistant to the commander-in-chief of Ukraine, also exaggerated: "It is strange that the two fighter planes crashed separately at such close times."
Interestingly, this time it was U.S. President Donald Trump and the U.S. Navy who took the initiative to “extinguish fire.” Trump was unconscious of these malicious speculations on Air Force One and excluded the possibility of man-made destruction. In an interview with reporters he said, “This is unusual ... they (the U.S. Navy) think the cause of the accident may be poor fuel quality. We will find out the truth. There is nothing to hide.”When asked whether the crash involves “intentional murder,” Trump said: “I don’t think so.”
A U.S. Navy official said in an interview that “we don’t think it’s a malicious act.”Two other sources with insight into the U.S. Navy’s preliminary investigation also confirmed Trump’s statement, saying “aircraft fuel pollution is the main suspicion of causing two crashes,” but they reminded that the specific causes of the crash still need to wait for the conclusions of the investigation.
But according to the U.S. Navy regulations, fighter jet fuel should not have such problems.27The day quite detailedly introduced that the "Super Big Bear" ship-based fighter jets and "Sea Hawk" helicopters used the standards of the navy.JP-5The aircraft fuel, which is stored in the tanks of the Nimitz aircraft carrier, will be regularly supplied by tanks under the Military Maritime Command if necessary. The fuel loaded by these tanks comes from the Pentagon-approved global fuel repository. Theoretically, the U.S. Navy will undergo a series of comprehensive tests and filters throughout the fuel supply and use to check for contaminants. According to the U.S. Navy’s requirements, the fuel must be filtered before it is loaded in the tanks of the supplied tanks. At the same time, the Nimitz aircraft carrier has several specialized tank tanks, which can accommodate as many as possible.300Ten million gallons of jet fuel. When in use, this fuel is pumped to another set of fuel storage tanks near the flight deck to provide replenishment for carrier-based aircraft ready to take off. Between each step, these fuels are sampled, tested for purity, and filtered multiple times.
That is to say, according to the normal process, the fuel that these fighter jets put on before take-off should all undergo layer sampling and filtration.If they put on really poor-quality fuel, it means that the U.S. military logistics system “does not pay attention” to the problem of fuel quality – such a result is either the U.S. military related positions are bought up and down by corrupt fuel suppliers, or they completely ignore the collective job of the sampling process.
Regardless of the reason, it means that a major problem has been exposed within the U.S. Navy.