In October, Japanese politics ushered in a change.

Takashi Saami was overwhelmingly elected president of the Liberal Democratic Party and became Japan's new prime minister.

In his first policy address, this loyal supporter of Abe's line put forward the "three noes" policy towards China-not taking the initiative to get close, not concealing economic wariness, and not engaging in one-on-one dialogue.

This move not only made Sino-Japanese relations tense again, but also caused widespread controversy at home and abroad.

What kind of political logic is hidden behind her policy?

What far-reaching impact will it have on Sino-Japanese relations?

His political career began in 1993.

She was elected as a member of the House of Representatives for the first time as a non-party member, then joined the Liberal Democratic Party, worked hard from the grassroots level and gradually accumulated political capital.

What really made her stand out was when Shinzo Abe first formed a cabinet in 2006, when she entered the cabinet and was responsible for Okinawa coordination, gender equality and other matters.

Takashi gradually gained a foothold in the party with his straightforward and tough style and became a core figure in the Abe faction.

She has an unusual relationship with Abe, and is even regarded by the outside world as the heir of Abe's political legacy.

Abe's "value diplomacy" and "Indo-Pacific strategy" have profoundly influenced the political philosophy of the high market.

Nowadays, based on Abe¡¯s iron-bone support, she has succeeded in her position against the backdrop of the low self-government support rate and the shore-to-shore cabinet scandal.

Takaichi Sanae's "three noes" policy became the biggest highlight of the policy address, directly demonstrating her tough hawkish stance towards China.

First, she said she would not proactively approach China, stressing the construction of "constructive relations".

This expression is meaningful and implies that Japan will adopt a more alienated attitude towards China.

This is in sharp contrast to the "strategic reciprocity" proposed by Shandong and demonstrates a major shift in Japan's policy towards China.

Second, the city clearly expressed economic concerns.

She bluntly said that economic security is a "suspense matter" in Sino-Japanese relations, and institutional prevention must be strengthened.

As early as when she served as Minister of Economic Security, she promoted supply chain reviews and policies to restrict Chinese mergers and acquisitions.

Now, she has further upgraded these measures, and Chinese-funded enterprises may face more obstacles to their investment in Japan in the future.

While this policy is aimed at protecting Japan¡¯s economic security, it could exacerbate economic friction between China and Japan.

Finally, Takashi emphasized that he would not engage in one-on-one dialogue, but would use the Japan-US alliance as the axis to promote the Indo-Pacific multilateral framework and unite with South Korea, Australia, India and other countries.

This strategy is more like encircling China than seeking bilateral cooperation.

However, the ¡°three no¡± policy of the high market also faces many challenges.

Japan's economy is highly dependent on the Chinese market. Data show that China is Japan's largest trading partner, and the bilateral trade volume between the two countries has exceeded 300 billion US dollars for many years.

The high-market diplomatic strategy also attracted international attention.

Her multilateral cooperation concept is in line with the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy, but the attitude of other Indo-Pacific countries is not unified, and whether this multilateral framework can form an effective joint force remains questionable.

China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded to Takashi's "three noes" policy, saying that it was "unilateral and unhelpful," indicating that China is cautious about Japan's tough stance.

Takaichi sanae's appointment marks the continuation of Abe's route, but Japan's current economic dilemma and complicated international situation put forward higher requirements for her.

Although her "three noes" policy shows a tough stance, whether it can find a balance between economic dependence and geopolitical pressure is still an issue worthy of attention.

Is the double back?

Maybe, but what Japan needs is not just a response, but a path to the future.