Looking back at the past, there is no need to regret, when the national transport really nothing can stop.

The United States' last Biden administration withdrew its troops from Afghanistan, and it wanted to concentrate on cleaning up the domestic rubbish, so as to open up its hands to repress China and revitalize the Asia-Pacific layout.

As a result, before the action started, the sudden conflict between Russia and Ukraine directly disrupted Biden's overall plan. The strategic resources of the United States were largely contained in Europe, and the containment force against China naturally weakened.

Ozawa had no intention of inserting willows, but objectively helped China win valuable development time and space in this period of great changes. It seems reasonable to say that he is an "unexpected hero" on the road of China's rejuvenation?

Biden pushed for the withdrawal of Afghan troops at the time, in fact, the calculation was clever.

He knows that the United States has spent twenty years in Afghanistan, spent trillions of dollars, and died thousands of soldiers. In the end, it didn't get any benefits, and the anti-war sentiment among the domestic people is getting higher and higher.

He wanted to earn a political score while withdrawing his troops, and then transfer the resources drawn from Afghanistan to the Indo-Pacific region, with a mindset against China.

After all, in their eyes, China is the only opponent that can pose a systemic challenge in the long run. Russia is at best an "urgent threat" rather than a long-term strategic goal.

But Biden counted, not counting that the Russian conflict would erupt in this bone.

The historical conflict between Russia and Ukraine has existed for a long time, and both sides have their own insistence on historical legacy and geological interests.

Contradictions have accumulated to a certain extent, and the outbreak of conflicts is actually inevitable, but no one expected that it would just be stuck at the key node of the strategic turn of the United States.

As soon as the conflict broke out, the United States was immediately caught in a dilemma.

The strategic focus of the United States 'original plan was clearly on the Indo-Pacific and did not want to be dragged down by the war in Europe. However, NATO allies are watching. If they do not stand up to support Ukraine, the NATO alliance system may fall apart and the influence of the United States in Europe will plummet.

Under the balance, the Biden administration could only bite the bullet and end up. Not only did it impose unprecedented sanctions on Russia, but it also continued to send weapons and funds to Ukraine.

But what Biden didn't expect was that this conflict did not bring about a "flag-gathering effect" as he expected, but instead put increasing pressure on him to govern.

After the 9/11 events, the U.S. president's support rate could spike to 90%, but the Russian-Ukrainian conflict occurred in Europe, and the American people's patriotic enthusiasm could not move at all.

Coupled with rising energy prices and intensifying inflation, people's dissatisfaction has become stronger and stronger. Biden's approval rating has not only failed to rise, but has been falling all the way.

What is even more embarrassing is that although the two parties in the United States have reached a superficial consensus on opposing Russia's aid to Uzbekistan, the Republican Party does not buy Biden's account at all. Instead, it constantly criticizes him for not being tough enough and blames his policy mistakes for domestic economic problems. The fighting between the two parties has become increasingly fierce, making the internal friction in the United States more serious.

The so-called ¡°Ukrainian funding¡± in the United States is said to be a blurred account.

U.S. Congress claimed to have approved hundreds of billions of dollars of aid to Ukraine, and Kazelensky himself acknowledged that Ukraine actually received only zero, and most of it was not cash, but weapons.

Later, everyone understood that most of the money did not leave the United States at all. It was either used to subsidize domestic military enterprises or spent on other war-related projects.

The Biden administration has also promoted outright that U.S. aid could create jobs because weapons are all manufactured in the United States.

This is indeed correct. American arms dealers have made a lot of money through this conflict. Among the 100 largest arms dealers in the world, the United States accounts for 41. Their sales revenue has increased in one year. A lot, accounting for half of the total global arms sales revenue.

But this kind of "war money" is based on the consumption of American national strength.

The military budget of the United States is getting higher and higher year by year, exceeding US $895 billion in fiscal year 2025. All the money is spent on weapons. Domestic infrastructure, education, medical care and other livelihood projects can only cut budgets, and the lives of ordinary people have not improved. With improvement, social contradictions naturally become more and more prominent.

As for the Western camp, which seems to be monolithic, they have long had their own plans. The Russia-Ukraine conflict just exposed these contradictions.

European countries initially followed the U.S. to impose sanctions on Russia, but soon had a bitter effect.

Europe used to rely heavily on cheap Russian natural gas, used to maintain industrial production and people's heating, after sanctions, can only buy high prices of US liquefied natural gas, energy prices have surged, the Netherlands' gas benchmark price has risen to the highest point in recent years.

This has trapped European companies miserably. In major industrial countries such as Germany and Poland, many factories have been forced to reduce or even stop production because of high energy costs. People's heating bills have also doubled several times, and they are full of complaints.

Slowly, European countries began to back down, still following the United States 'slogans, but became increasingly passive in their actions.

Hungary has not cooperated directly and has repeatedly opposed the EU's imposition of new sanctions on Russia. Instead, it has become closer and closer to China and cooperated to build the Hungary-Serbia Railway to make connectivity in Central and Eastern Europe smoother.

There is Mongolia, which, while the United States and Europe have pressured it to express its opposition to Russia, has always remained neutral, because 92 percent of its energy needs are to be met by Russia, and does not dare to blame the neighbor at all.

Just as the United States and the West were overwhelmed by the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, China has always maintained a clear head, always adhered to a neutral stance, and actively promoted peace talks.

China never poured oil on fire, nor sought private profits, but instead proactively rushed to ease the situation and resolve the crisis.

This responsible attitude has attracted many countries 'attention and won more cooperation opportunities for China.

Amid the energy crisis and economic difficulties, European countries are becoming more and more aware of the importance of cooperation with China. China-Europe freight trains are running more and more frequently. In 2024, the China-Europe Trade and Logistics Cooperation Park in Hungary alone will operate 31 trains, transporting thousands of containers.

Similarly, the cooperation between Russia and China has further deepened. Whether it is Europe or Russia, cooperation with China is the result of your love and wish. It has also completely failed the attempt of the United States to "decouple and break the link" between Russia and Europe and China.

The United States has always wanted to face both China-Russia challenges simultaneously, but after all, the national strength is limited, and the resources that can be used in the Asia-Pacific region have been greatly reduced after the Russian-Ukrainian conflict has captured the European battlefield.

In the past, the United States wanted to pull its allies to make trouble in the South China Sea and form various military alliances to contain China. Now that its allies are either overwhelmed with themselves or unwilling to take risks with the United States, these plans are naturally difficult to advance.

China, on the other hand, undertakes practical development during this valuable window period, the scientific and technological field continues to breakthrough, the economy grows steadily, and the international influence is also growing.

Zelensky may not have realized it until now that he "unintentionally planted a willow tree" and was bent on using Western power to win the war, but in the end, he objectively helped China a big favor.

He continued to ask the West for assistance, plunging the United States and Europe into the ravages of war and unable to concentrate on containing China.

He persisted in the attitude of confrontation, so that the Russian-Ukrainian conflict could not be resolved late, and the contradictions in the Western camp became deeper and weaker, and the cohesion was weakening.

Of course, China doesn't rely on the mistakes of others to develop, but no matter how the external environment changes, it always sticks to its own path and immerses itself in doing its own thing well.

But it is indisputable that the internal rupture of the Western camp and the strategic misjudgment brought about by the conflict in Russia and Ukraine have indeed given us a more relaxed environment for development.

Coincidence in historical development is always surprising. Perhaps this is God bless China.