The Sino-US talks in Kuala Lumpur finally ended. The United States abandoned its plan to impose 100% tariffs on China, while China postponed the implementation of rare earth export restrictions for one year.

However, this meeting between the two sides in Kuala Lumpur has shown the world that the initiative in the game between China and the United States has shifted from the hands of the United States to China.

It is impossible for the United States to control China in trade.

Previously, US President Trump put forward three issues. Originally, he intended to take the initiative of discourse in his own hands by setting the goals of solving problems such as rare earths, American soybeans and fentanyl. However, the last meeting between Minister Li Chenggang and Finance Minister Bescent has shown that the card is not in the hands of the United States. What kind of result the two sides will achieve in the end mainly depends on what kind of concessions the United States can make, and it still takes the initiative to make.

From the outcome of the talks, it is clear that the United States has taken a step back.

After the talks between the two sides, we can feel this subtle difference.

Besent first delivered a speech to the outside world after the talks between the two sides finally ended. Besent claimed that the United States has promised to abandon the 100% levy plan, and China has also decided to delay the implementation of rare earth control measures for one year.

Bessent said that during the talks between the United States and China, a "very successful negotiating framework" was reached on issues of interest between the two sides, and that the next step would be a higher-level meeting between the two sides in South Korea, that is, the final negotiation between the top leaders of the two sides.

China's negotiating minister's statement on behalf of Li Zheng Steel is more interesting, and the content of the information disclosed is still large.

First of all, on the topics of the talks between the two sides, China is not limited to the topics set by the United States, but has set corresponding topics according to our interests, including the ship tax, fentanyl tariff and tariff extension period levied by the United States according to Article 30, etc.

From the statements of Minister Li Zhengzhou, we can see that our talks are not limited to one or several topics, but concern a series of topics that are most concerned about China.

The United States wants to talk one by one, and we just pack up and talk. Who has the time to grind with them one by one? Everyone's time is precious, isn't it?

Judging from the results of the talks, although the position of the United States is also very tough, and even threatened us by uniting with the European Union to deal with China, the United States finally accepted China's request to package and solve the problem.

Otherwise, Minister Li Chenggang wouldn't have used the phrase "the US side is tough in expressing its position and China is firm in safeguarding its interests" to describe the process and result of the talks between the two sides after the talks.

It can be imagined how the two sides were at war during the talks and gave each other no way in terms of core interests.

So why should the outcome of this meeting be quantified by a ¡°very successful negotiation framework¡±?

This is normal from the perspective of the interests of the two countries. The results of the talks without any differences are not reliable.

And for us, the reason to raise so many issues, of course, it is also because it involves our core interests, at this time not to get out of talk, can wait for the United States to slow down and talk again?

Take the ship tax under Section 301 as an example. It is obviously a matter that harms others and does not benefit others. Isn't it still subject to port fees for ships related to the United States? We raised this issue just because we didn't want to get entangled with the United States on these matters.

The question of Fentanyl tariffs, in fact, is that we are in a vacuum, we are very clear.

The continued extension of reciprocal tariffs is actually beneficial to both China and the United States, otherwise the United States would not have been extending it all the time.

We have put forward a package of solutions to these issues, and in fact, we are both upholding our interests and giving the United States downstairs.

In addition, let¡¯s not look at the tools in the toolbox that the U.S. claims to have in hand, but it¡¯s not that difficult to deal with our actual threats, and even if we put Europe together, we won¡¯t be afraid.

To know, on this rare earth card in the hands of China, has not been finally handed out, only to get out shake, has made the European and American countries to break the defense, a ants rushed like a hot pot.

In order to let China loosen its control of rare earth, the Western countries can say they have made various means, especially the United States, to start negotiations with China, which time is not hanging rare earth on their mouths?

Without China's rare earths, the so-called high technology in western countries can only sit and eat and wait to die.

When China implements rare earth control, these western countries are anxious. When they imposed various trade restrictions on China, why didn't they consider China's feelings and the counterattacks that China might take?

Now, do you know it hurts?

If you want China's rare earths, there is no problem. Just follow China's rare earth use rules. At the same time, we have to do business well with China and make a fortune together. Isn't it good? Why do we have to do so many tricks?

Now that China and the United States have reached an agreement in the general direction, Trump said that he will "reach a very good agreement with China" in South Korea. Isn't that just reassurance in his mouth, haha.