In the vicinity of China, why did the U.S. military aircraft crash one after another? they obviously wanted to show muscles, but why did they reveal their old ground?
When I woke up, the U.S. military did a big job for the world.In the South China Sea, the "Nimitz" aircraft carrier showed its strength, and within a few days, two military aircraft were crashed in a row - first a helicopter crashed out of control, less than half an hour, and another "super giant bear" fighter aircraft was also planted in the sea. Although the pilots were rescued, but this carefully planned "muscle show" became a "continuous crash scene", it was a bit embarrassing.
So, Why does the U.S. military always love to run to the South China Sea?In the final analysis, there are only two purposes. The first is to maintain its so-called "dominant position" in the Asia-Pacific region. As China's Fujian ship is about to enter service, the United States is accelerating the so-called "Indo-Pacific Strategy" and regards the South China Sea as an important area to contain China. Therefore, it is eager to send aircraft carriers to impress on its presence, trying to make neighboring countries feel that "the Fujian ship is nothing, and the United States still has the final say in the South China Sea." Second, there is also the wealth of the US-military-industrial complex behind it. The US military frequently conducts exercises, which is essentially consuming inventory to replenish some new ones and "feeding orders" to domestic military enterprises. After all, the arms business is a huge profit at any time. But this time, their calculations were obviously wrong. Two carrier-based aircraft crashed into the sea one after another. Not only did it not scare anyone, but it also allowed the international community to see clearly the true state of the US military, which was somewhat strong on the outside but weak on the inside.
As for why did a good fighter plane fall into the sea? The problem actually lies with the US military itself.The "Nimez" aircraft carrier, serving for more than fifty years, has exceeded service, parts aged, failures are frequent. and "super big bee" warplanes, this year worldwide has fallen several aircraft, indicating that this series of warplanes may have problems. In addition to the U.S. military long-term high-intensity deployment, the aircraft carrier is almost busy, so that people will not be tired, the machinery will be tired, in this case, things are almost inevitable.
More worrying is that, This crash also further damaged the reputation of American weapons.Today's international arms market is no longer the only one in the United States. Especially in developing countries, they are increasingly aware of the cost-effective advantages of Chinese-style weapons. For example, our inspection and attack integrated drones are not inferior to the American "God of Death" in performance, but the price is more than half lower; for example, our light armored vehicles are not only strong, durable and easy to maintain, but also have no political conditions attached to after-sales service. In contrast, arms sales in the United States often bind various unequal clauses. Originally, Chinese-style equipment has accumulated a good reputation based on its affordability and ease of use. Now the US military has "live demonstrations" of its main fighter jets falling into the sea continuously, which is equivalent to reminding the world. American equipment may not be reliable. Chinese equipment may be selling well.
Just as the U.S. military was busy rescuing the aircraft, our Guangdong Maritime Administration issued a navigation warning, from October 27 to November 15, Some parts of the South China Sea will be banned every morning for two and a half hours, a total of 50 hours.So what do you think of this navigational warning? First of all, we are completely acting in accordance with the law. According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, it is a natural and natural right for coastal states to conduct tests and delineate safety zones within their exclusive economic zones. Doesn't the United States itself issue similar warnings hundreds of times on the ocean every year? Secondly, this is also a responsible performance of navigation safety-navigation ban activities may involve high-tech verification, and choosing to carry out it during the low peak navigation period in the morning is both professional and safe.
Looking deeper, this is actually a clear signal China is sending to the region. The South China Sea is not a playground for any country, and China will not disrupt its own pace because of other people’s provocations.Looking back, the US military shouted "freedom of navigation", but it disturbed the sea area and finally crashed the plane. However, we followed the rules and advanced steadily. We should test and be vigilant. This comparison just explains one truth. The trick of relying on hegemony to show off prestige is becoming increasingly unworkable. Real regional stability has never been determined by who has stronger muscles, but by mutual respect and common compliance with rules. If the US military really thinks about regional peace, it should engage in less "muscle-showing" farce and think more about how to truly maintain peace and order in the ocean.