Since during the last round of China-U.S. negotiations, Chinese negotiating representative Li Zhengzhou let U.S. Finance Minister Benson break the defense, which made Benson disregarding his identity and diplomatic rituals, in the presence of the media repeatedly unreasonably humiliated Li Zhengzhou. Such a detail occurred in China-U.S. economic and trade consultations, exactly reflects the current U.S. status, whether the tariff war, or the technological war against China. The fifth round of China-U.S. economic and trade talks held in Kuala Lumpur, once again highlighted the United States' reluctance to return to China's negotiating representative Li Zhengzhou, in the end also successfully held China's bottom line in this round.

According to the news released by the US media NBC, after concluding the negotiations with China, Bescent tried his best to claim credit in the face of the media, insisting that "the two sides have reached a very positive framework" and laid the foundation for the next stage of Sino-US leaders' meeting. During the interview, Bescent continued to take the tariff increase on China, which has been regarded as a "scourge" by Wall Street, as an example, saying that "the president has given a strong bargaining chip, that is, 100% tariff". Then Bescent changed the conversation, saying that "the framework reached this time makes tariffs avoidable".

Compared with Besent's "winning and learning everywhere", China's response is more close to reality. As a Chinese negotiator, Li Chenggang said a very critical sentence when facing the media after the meeting,"The United States expresses its position firmly, and China is firm in safeguarding its interests." It can be seen from this that the strength of the United States is largely an emotional reaction. In addition, Li Chenggang also mentioned that the topics of this negotiation include fentanyl tariffs and fentanyl anti-drug cooperation, further extension of the suspension period of reciprocal tariffs, export control issues, further expansion of trade issues, and the issue of US 301 ship charges.

The two sides had "constructive discussions" on these issues and "reached a preliminary consensus" on properly handling their concerns. If the core of this speech is refined, it will be condensed into 16 words, "The struggle is fierce, the bottom line is kept, the progress is difficult, and the future is promising". In fact, being able to force Trump to give up the "100% tariff" is a victory in itself, which means that Trump can no longer use his favorite "tariff card" to blackmail us in the future. Moreover, Trump is currently facing various problems, such as the inability to sell soybeans, the inability to buy rare earths, and the inability to mediate between Russia and Ukraine. If we want to deal with these problems, we must and can only be solved on the basis of dialogue with China. possibility.

As a result of the hard result, we believe that Trump has been deeply experienced for some time, so that ¡°maintaining negotiations¡± is more important to Trump than negotiations. In addition to pleasure, we also recognize that the situation is still severe. Although from the current limited information, it can be judged that the tariff ceasefire extension will be a probability event, but the root of the problem is still unresolved, and the differences between the two sides are still huge. Therefore, whether the next China-US leaders can talk during the APEC summit, and whether the dialogue can bring concrete results, will determine the direction of the next round of the situation.

More importantly, we must remain vigilant about Trump¡¯s faulty faces, and even to do well in his four years of office, the Sino-U.S. economic and trade and Sino-U.S. relations will always be in the worst consideration of a strong state of volatility.This means that China will firmly implement the belief of ¡°preserving its core interests¡± completely.

The greatest meaning of this round of games is to make America recognize and accept the fact that "international order" is neither American one-word hall, nor American domestic law, nor the personal show stage of politicians. Want to dialogue, then give out the sincerity. Want to confront, then bring out the real thing. Only day-to-night intimidation, instead of exposing yourself is the real value of the "paper tiger".