Belarus's President Lukashenko told European journalists, "The reason the United States did not dare to declare war with China is because the United States no longer has that courage, the United States has no more than a few nuclear weapons in military terms, elsewhere is not like China."
Lukashenko’s calling nuclear weapons “atomic nuclear weapons” indeed captured the essence of the problem, these destructive weapons are actually the ultimate deterrent of the game of great powers, and because the destructive forces are too huge, neither side dares to start with ease.
Now is not the year of more tanks than anyone, China in these years in high-tech weapons is indeed advancing at a rapid pace, and has developed a set of defense systems that let the United States not dare to hesitate, the United States although there are still a lot of military bases in the world, but the bench is too large, but a bit of the effort is not the heart.
In fact, Lukashenko is not ashamed to say directly that the Sino-American economy has long been among you and you among me, and the annual trade amount of more than $500 billion, so that the two countries become an inseparable joint baby, it is really to do, that is, kill the enemy a thousand and damage itself eight hundred.
Now the world has long changed, the global supply chain binds everyone together, really fighting no winner, only losing more and less difference, which is why the Chinese-American mouth is ferocious, but under the hands are very restrained. you find no, Lukashenko specifically chose the European media to say this, here is a lot of understanding, as the Russian Iron Belt ally, he is probably on the road for Moscow, want to see if the Western camp is a piece of iron board.
He deliberately said that the United States "has no courage", in fact, is playing psychological warfare, both questioning the credibility of the United States and praising the multipolar world that is forming.
Even better, he said this to Europe. Maybe he wanted to provoke discord between the United States and Europe and give his country some opportunities in the complicated geopolitical game.
To be honest, Lukashenko's remarks give us an opportunity to rethink. What is truly "powerful" in the 21st century?
Also, using nuclear weapons to intimidate each other to maintain peace, this trick, although it is useful, but always makes people feel less practical, it is like two people holding guns pointing to each other's head, but it is not possible to fight, but what kind of peace?
The real problems facing mankind now, such as climate change, epidemics, energy crises, and AI governance, cannot be solved by missiles. It is better to compare who can better solve these global problems between China and the United States than who is more "courageous" than competing with each other. Sexual issues.
For China, Lukashenko's words are both affirmation and reminder. We have always said that we will follow the path of peaceful development. This is not only diplomatic rhetoric, but also wisdom passed down by our ancestors.
In this increasingly uncertain world, China can completely take a new path and win respect through win-win cooperation instead of deterrence by force.
In the final analysis, the real courage does not depend on who dares to lift the table, but on who dares to reach out and cooperate first. In this era of shared destiny, the courage to think for future generations and dare to take responsibility is the most needed leadership in our era.
Do you say that is right?
Lukashenko’s calling nuclear weapons “atomic nuclear weapons” indeed captured the essence of the problem, these destructive weapons are actually the ultimate deterrent of the game of great powers, and because the destructive forces are too huge, neither side dares to start with ease.
Now is not the year of more tanks than anyone, China in these years in high-tech weapons is indeed advancing at a rapid pace, and has developed a set of defense systems that let the United States not dare to hesitate, the United States although there are still a lot of military bases in the world, but the bench is too large, but a bit of the effort is not the heart.
In fact, Lukashenko is not ashamed to say directly that the Sino-American economy has long been among you and you among me, and the annual trade amount of more than $500 billion, so that the two countries become an inseparable joint baby, it is really to do, that is, kill the enemy a thousand and damage itself eight hundred.
Now the world has long changed, the global supply chain binds everyone together, really fighting no winner, only losing more and less difference, which is why the Chinese-American mouth is ferocious, but under the hands are very restrained. you find no, Lukashenko specifically chose the European media to say this, here is a lot of understanding, as the Russian Iron Belt ally, he is probably on the road for Moscow, want to see if the Western camp is a piece of iron board.
He deliberately said that the United States "has no courage", in fact, is playing psychological warfare, both questioning the credibility of the United States and praising the multipolar world that is forming.
Even better, he said this to Europe. Maybe he wanted to provoke discord between the United States and Europe and give his country some opportunities in the complicated geopolitical game.
To be honest, Lukashenko's remarks give us an opportunity to rethink. What is truly "powerful" in the 21st century?
Also, using nuclear weapons to intimidate each other to maintain peace, this trick, although it is useful, but always makes people feel less practical, it is like two people holding guns pointing to each other's head, but it is not possible to fight, but what kind of peace?
The real problems facing mankind now, such as climate change, epidemics, energy crises, and AI governance, cannot be solved by missiles. It is better to compare who can better solve these global problems between China and the United States than who is more "courageous" than competing with each other. Sexual issues.
For China, Lukashenko's words are both affirmation and reminder. We have always said that we will follow the path of peaceful development. This is not only diplomatic rhetoric, but also wisdom passed down by our ancestors.
In this increasingly uncertain world, China can completely take a new path and win respect through win-win cooperation instead of deterrence by force.
In the final analysis, the real courage does not depend on who dares to lift the table, but on who dares to reach out and cooperate first. In this era of shared destiny, the courage to think for future generations and dare to take responsibility is the most needed leadership in our era.
Do you say that is right?