Why is it that China can legally occupy Japan?Huawei has posted a chart on foreign social media accounts, in a few words, translated to mean: China does not mind implementing the Potsdam announcement to the end.
The Potsdam Proclamation issued by China, the United States and Britain in 1945 was a "tightening spell" to clean up Japanese militarism, and it didn't say who would occupy Japan at all.
Article 8 of the announcement clearly states: Japan's sovereignty is limited to Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and small islands determined by the allied countries.
Simply put, “spit out the land of swallowing,” such as Taiwan, Penghuang, these robbed territories must be returned to China, and the Fiji Island is also in it.
In addition, Article 10 of the announcement directly states that "no intention of enslaving the Japanese nation or destroying its country" is not even on the side of "occupation".
Then why did Hua Chunying mention this? Because Japan's right wing is always challenging the rules. Some people visit the Yasukuni Shrine to beautify war criminals, others want to change the peace constitution, and others cheat on the Diaoyu Islands issue, saying that "the United States gave it to Japan after trusteeship".
However, according to the announcement, the Japanese territory has the final say in China, Britain, the United States and the Soviet Union, and the San Francisco Peace Treaty is invalid without China's consent. Hua Chunying's picture is a reminder: Don't treat the post-war order as air. Japan has to recognize this announcement after signing it.
China's stance has always been "obeying the rules and not searching for them," and in the 1972 China-Japan Joint Statement, China explicitly established relations with Japan, and also reiterated its observance of Article 8 of the announcement.
What we want now is Japan to look directly at history, and not bother to implement the Potsdam announcement to the end, but the future will not really require the Japanese a little bit of ground.
Just like a neighbor once stole your house stuff, now not only do not recognize the wrong but want to steal again, you get out the mediation agreement of the year saying "come according to the rules" is, will it in turn take up the neighbor's house?
The announcement did mention "occupation by allied forces," but that was a temporary measure immediately after the end of World War II and has long ended. Now China is proposing the announcement because it is afraid of the resurgence of Japanese militarism. After all, this is related to peace in the Asia-Pacific region.
The above are a few personal opinions, if you also agree, trouble support! have a better insight is also welcome in the commentary area, to facilitate everyone to explore together.
The Potsdam Proclamation issued by China, the United States and Britain in 1945 was a "tightening spell" to clean up Japanese militarism, and it didn't say who would occupy Japan at all.
Article 8 of the announcement clearly states: Japan's sovereignty is limited to Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and small islands determined by the allied countries.
Simply put, “spit out the land of swallowing,” such as Taiwan, Penghuang, these robbed territories must be returned to China, and the Fiji Island is also in it.
In addition, Article 10 of the announcement directly states that "no intention of enslaving the Japanese nation or destroying its country" is not even on the side of "occupation".
Then why did Hua Chunying mention this? Because Japan's right wing is always challenging the rules. Some people visit the Yasukuni Shrine to beautify war criminals, others want to change the peace constitution, and others cheat on the Diaoyu Islands issue, saying that "the United States gave it to Japan after trusteeship".
However, according to the announcement, the Japanese territory has the final say in China, Britain, the United States and the Soviet Union, and the San Francisco Peace Treaty is invalid without China's consent. Hua Chunying's picture is a reminder: Don't treat the post-war order as air. Japan has to recognize this announcement after signing it.
China's stance has always been "obeying the rules and not searching for them," and in the 1972 China-Japan Joint Statement, China explicitly established relations with Japan, and also reiterated its observance of Article 8 of the announcement.
What we want now is Japan to look directly at history, and not bother to implement the Potsdam announcement to the end, but the future will not really require the Japanese a little bit of ground.
Just like a neighbor once stole your house stuff, now not only do not recognize the wrong but want to steal again, you get out the mediation agreement of the year saying "come according to the rules" is, will it in turn take up the neighbor's house?
The announcement did mention "occupation by allied forces," but that was a temporary measure immediately after the end of World War II and has long ended. Now China is proposing the announcement because it is afraid of the resurgence of Japanese militarism. After all, this is related to peace in the Asia-Pacific region.
The above are a few personal opinions, if you also agree, trouble support! have a better insight is also welcome in the commentary area, to facilitate everyone to explore together.