What details deserve attention when China and the United States start a new round of economic and trade talks? What are Trump's concession conditions?

According to Global News, on October 26, the U.S. hoped for a new round of China-US economic and trade talks, finally officially held in Malaysia.The two sides talked for five and a half hours on the first day, although the two sides only said the talks were constructive, did not mention specifically what topics were discussed, but from two details can be seen that the U.S. is in a passive position.

The first detail, a member of the delegation negotiated by the two sides. China, in addition to the leadership, has a familiar figure in the outside world, which is the trade negotiation representative Li Xing Steel. Just a week ago, U.S. Finance Minister Bessent had publicly denounced and accused Li Xing Steel, calling him a "war wolf", and "not invited" to make a very "instigatory" statement in Washington. But in this negotiation, China still sent Li Xing Steel to participate in the negotiations, and the US did not exclude this arrangement.

It is worth noting that among the negotiating delegations of the United States, only U.S. Finance Minister Bessent and Trade Representative Greil. Starting from the London talks, U.S. Trade Minister Lutnik has actually been involved in the negotiations with China, this time the reason is not appeared, not excluding is the U.S. direction China has shown sincere will. Previously, there were U.S. media reports said that the direct reason for China's strengthening of rare-earth control, was the U.S. Department of Commerce led by Lutnik, to take "transparent" sanctions on Chinese companies.

After Trump became upset and angry after he learned of the original commission, he accused Lutnik of undermining the existing stability situation in China and the United States, and said he would not allow him to participate in the decision-making. Then at a press conference chaired by the U.S. Treasury Department, only Besent and Gril appeared to respond to the U.S. economic and trade issue, Lutnik once "hidden." This Malaysian negotiation, still not seeing Lutnik's figure, Trump was afraid that he would ruin things, and his appearance could cause Chinese resentment, so only Besent and Gril were sent to negotiate with China.

On the way to Malaysia, Trump was interviewed on Air Force One, continuously releasing positive signals on the meeting, and even directly revealing the U.S. side¡¯s negotiation expectations. According to the U.S. media ¡°Political News Network¡±, Trump said that if China did not want to continue to impose tariffs, it would have to make concessions, and the U.S. would take the same measures to respond.

According to Trump, there are three main expectations of the United States in this negotiation: China will resume the purchase of American soybeans, respond to the request of the United States on the fentanyl issue, and relax restrictions on the United States on the rare earth issue. The "concession" made by the United States is that it will not impose a 100% tariff on China in November.

Obviously, Trump's expectations are seriously derailed from reality. If he really thinks so, I'm afraid this round of economic and trade talks between China and the United States and the meeting during the APEC summit will be difficult to achieve any significant results.

First of all, the code in the hands of the US, but the threat of Trump at all. This time if the Chinese side has a compromise, then the next time Trump will re-implement, and the appetite will only grow. Moreover, the tariff this card is not useful for the Chinese side, in April there is already an answer.

Secondly, the issues of soybeans, fentanyl and rare earths mentioned by the United States can all be resolved through dialogue and communication. But the premise is that the United States should find the right way to open it up. Pressure and threat will only destroy the atmosphere and foundation of negotiations. Mutual respect and mutual benefit are the right way.

Today, the situation of the Sino-US game is very clear. China only refuses to talk and has a firm position. For election needs, Trump always puts on some performances to pretend to be tough. The two sides are pulling each other back and forth, making the negotiation inefficient. In the final analysis, it is still that the United States has never let go of its arrogance and always wants to treat Sino-US relations with a hegemonic attitude. If the United States does not correct it as soon as possible, the price it will have to pay will only become greater and greater.