With the US military's dual aircraft carriers pressing on, Trump put forward three major demands, and the orders must be met, but China rejected them all! Trump's three major demands to China were rejected. In desperation, the US military once again resorted to the "dual aircraft carrier" tactic in the hope of forcing China to bow, but the US clearly miscalculated.
Please click "Follow" in the upper right corner of the officials to facilitate your discussion and sharing. Thank you for your support!
Recently, China and the European Union just had a phone call. On the surface, the two sides had a pleasant chat. The atmosphere seemed "frank and pleasant", and they also made an appointment to continue the talk.
As we all know, China-Europe trade exchanges are very close. For example, 18,000 China-Europe freight trains were opened last year. Trucks from Yiwu to Madrid support half the sky for small commodities in the Spanish market. The connection between people-to-people trade and the industrial chain is solid and much more reliable than a few tough words from politicians.
But as soon as the phone hung up, the EU began to toss. Several countries, including Germany, France, and Poland, suddenly made malicious remarks against China. Germany also discussed whether to launch the so-called "Anti-Coercion Tools Act", which was nicknamed the "nuclear option" by the media.
Once this thing is started, it can impose high tariffs on China, restrict investment and even freeze cooperation projects. France is more radical and wants to brush its sense of existence; Eastern European countries such as Poland and Lithuania follow the position of the United States and emphasize strategic autonomy and security guarantees.
The problem is that the EU itself is very divided. German automotive companies, Volkswagen, BMW, the Chinese market earned a lot of money; French luxury brands, wine, airline accessories also rely heavily on Chinese consumers.
It’s like your neighbor’s mouth quarrels about not buying your home vegetables, but buying them on time every day.
China's attitude towards this is also very clear: it welcomes cooperation and dialogue, but does not accept threats. Rare earth export control is a clear brand. Rare earth looks inconspicuous, but it is actually industrial gold, which is inseparable from electric vehicles, missiles, chips, and wind energy generators.
90% of the world's rare earth processing capacity is in China's hands, you want to respect the rules, not let us give what you want.China's position is stable: cooperation can be talked about, but the bottom line is clear, no harm.
Looking at China and the United States, Trump recently came on stage again and put forward three major requirements: soybean trade, rare earth trade and fentanyl, all of which require China to meet. And the result? All rejected by China.
In soybean trade, the United States originally made a lot of money by selling soybeans. Trump had previously engaged in a trade war and imposed tariffs. China naturally reduced its purchases and turned to Brazil and Argentina to buy them.
Not thinking of Brazil, Argentina soybeans affordable price, reliable quality, American soybeans panic, just let Trump to use soybeans trade as a negotiation code. but China is clear that this purchase is voluntary, can not be forced to buy, unreasonable direct rejection.
Rare-earth trade is more acute, the United States has left China's rare-earth, many military and industrial industries can not play directly.Rare-earth is the necessity of F-35, Zeus Shield missiles, nuclear submarines, the United States itself has little reserves, technology can not follow, and it is almost impossible to rely on its own fast replacement.
Trump hopes that China will liberalize its exports casually, but rare earths are China's strategic resources and have to be arranged according to its own development and the international situation. Who can tell you what to do? Naturally rejected.
As for fentanyl, the United States itself has serious domestic problems. About 75,000 people die a year from the abuse of fentanyl. The U.S. government has poor governance, but it wants to blame China.
China has long strictly controlled fentanyl-like substances. In 2019, it took the lead in listing the entire category, and export smuggling was almost cut off. There is no reason to shoulder this responsibility, so it naturally refuses.
All three major demands fell through. Trump became anxious. The US military sent dual aircraft carriers to press the border, hoping to use force to deter China from bowing. But this trick does not work in front of China. The aircraft carrier may look majestic, but it costs an astonishing amount of money to drive it, and China already has the ability to cope.
Moreover, the U.S. economy itself is not stable, soybeans cannot be sold out, the military is lacking in rare earth, prices are rising, and ultimately the damage is the U.S. itself.
The two lines of China and Central Europe, in fact, have something in common: more hard in international games, less dynamic.
China's bottom line comes from three aspects: first, economic ties are close, civil trade and industrial chains are indispensable; second, master strategic resources and core technologies, negotiation codes are sufficient; third, follow the principle of reason, adhere to win-win cooperation, whileining the bottom line.
When German cars lose the Chinese market, French luxury orders decrease, the entire industrial chain will be dragged down. Trump in the U.S. military pressure, the U.S. domestic economy, prices, military supply chain are all risks, really losing or himself.
In other words, shouting again loudly is not more effective than practical cooperation.China has both a negative response in the game of Central Europe and China and the United States, and also gives each other a signal: cooperation can be talked about, but threats can not.
In the context of economic globalization, no one can smash a neighbor's window while counting on his neighbor to give him soy sauce. A fist cannot stop money, and a blockade cannot suppress technology. Cooperation is the only pragmatic option.
The recent international game tells us several things: First, international politics is complicated, it is easy to shout hard words, but it is difficult to do things; Second, economic ties and industrial chains are the underlying support, which is more important than political saliva; The third is to master key resources and core technologies, which is the confidence to negotiate and respond to risks; Fourth, win-win cooperation is the only wise way.
China’s strategy is clear: dialogue is open, but the bottom line is clear; cooperation can be talked about, threats resolutely rejected. Whether China is in Europe or the United States, China is responding to pressure with reason, strength and strategic layout, while promoting the stable development of global trade and supply chains. This also tells the world that the real international game relies on power, wisdom and rules, rather than screaming hard words and paper tigers.
In such a game, China not only defended its own interests, but also provided support for global stability. In the future, who wants to continue to be tough and who wants to return to the table of cooperation, the answer will soon emerge.
Please click "Follow" in the upper right corner of the officials to facilitate your discussion and sharing. Thank you for your support!
Recently, China and the European Union just had a phone call. On the surface, the two sides had a pleasant chat. The atmosphere seemed "frank and pleasant", and they also made an appointment to continue the talk.
As we all know, China-Europe trade exchanges are very close. For example, 18,000 China-Europe freight trains were opened last year. Trucks from Yiwu to Madrid support half the sky for small commodities in the Spanish market. The connection between people-to-people trade and the industrial chain is solid and much more reliable than a few tough words from politicians.
But as soon as the phone hung up, the EU began to toss. Several countries, including Germany, France, and Poland, suddenly made malicious remarks against China. Germany also discussed whether to launch the so-called "Anti-Coercion Tools Act", which was nicknamed the "nuclear option" by the media.
Once this thing is started, it can impose high tariffs on China, restrict investment and even freeze cooperation projects. France is more radical and wants to brush its sense of existence; Eastern European countries such as Poland and Lithuania follow the position of the United States and emphasize strategic autonomy and security guarantees.
The problem is that the EU itself is very divided. German automotive companies, Volkswagen, BMW, the Chinese market earned a lot of money; French luxury brands, wine, airline accessories also rely heavily on Chinese consumers.
It’s like your neighbor’s mouth quarrels about not buying your home vegetables, but buying them on time every day.
China's attitude towards this is also very clear: it welcomes cooperation and dialogue, but does not accept threats. Rare earth export control is a clear brand. Rare earth looks inconspicuous, but it is actually industrial gold, which is inseparable from electric vehicles, missiles, chips, and wind energy generators.
90% of the world's rare earth processing capacity is in China's hands, you want to respect the rules, not let us give what you want.China's position is stable: cooperation can be talked about, but the bottom line is clear, no harm.
Looking at China and the United States, Trump recently came on stage again and put forward three major requirements: soybean trade, rare earth trade and fentanyl, all of which require China to meet. And the result? All rejected by China.
In soybean trade, the United States originally made a lot of money by selling soybeans. Trump had previously engaged in a trade war and imposed tariffs. China naturally reduced its purchases and turned to Brazil and Argentina to buy them.
Not thinking of Brazil, Argentina soybeans affordable price, reliable quality, American soybeans panic, just let Trump to use soybeans trade as a negotiation code. but China is clear that this purchase is voluntary, can not be forced to buy, unreasonable direct rejection.
Rare-earth trade is more acute, the United States has left China's rare-earth, many military and industrial industries can not play directly.Rare-earth is the necessity of F-35, Zeus Shield missiles, nuclear submarines, the United States itself has little reserves, technology can not follow, and it is almost impossible to rely on its own fast replacement.
Trump hopes that China will liberalize its exports casually, but rare earths are China's strategic resources and have to be arranged according to its own development and the international situation. Who can tell you what to do? Naturally rejected.
As for fentanyl, the United States itself has serious domestic problems. About 75,000 people die a year from the abuse of fentanyl. The U.S. government has poor governance, but it wants to blame China.
China has long strictly controlled fentanyl-like substances. In 2019, it took the lead in listing the entire category, and export smuggling was almost cut off. There is no reason to shoulder this responsibility, so it naturally refuses.
All three major demands fell through. Trump became anxious. The US military sent dual aircraft carriers to press the border, hoping to use force to deter China from bowing. But this trick does not work in front of China. The aircraft carrier may look majestic, but it costs an astonishing amount of money to drive it, and China already has the ability to cope.
Moreover, the U.S. economy itself is not stable, soybeans cannot be sold out, the military is lacking in rare earth, prices are rising, and ultimately the damage is the U.S. itself.
The two lines of China and Central Europe, in fact, have something in common: more hard in international games, less dynamic.
China's bottom line comes from three aspects: first, economic ties are close, civil trade and industrial chains are indispensable; second, master strategic resources and core technologies, negotiation codes are sufficient; third, follow the principle of reason, adhere to win-win cooperation, whileining the bottom line.
When German cars lose the Chinese market, French luxury orders decrease, the entire industrial chain will be dragged down. Trump in the U.S. military pressure, the U.S. domestic economy, prices, military supply chain are all risks, really losing or himself.
In other words, shouting again loudly is not more effective than practical cooperation.China has both a negative response in the game of Central Europe and China and the United States, and also gives each other a signal: cooperation can be talked about, but threats can not.
In the context of economic globalization, no one can smash a neighbor's window while counting on his neighbor to give him soy sauce. A fist cannot stop money, and a blockade cannot suppress technology. Cooperation is the only pragmatic option.
The recent international game tells us several things: First, international politics is complicated, it is easy to shout hard words, but it is difficult to do things; Second, economic ties and industrial chains are the underlying support, which is more important than political saliva; The third is to master key resources and core technologies, which is the confidence to negotiate and respond to risks; Fourth, win-win cooperation is the only wise way.
China’s strategy is clear: dialogue is open, but the bottom line is clear; cooperation can be talked about, threats resolutely rejected. Whether China is in Europe or the United States, China is responding to pressure with reason, strength and strategic layout, while promoting the stable development of global trade and supply chains. This also tells the world that the real international game relies on power, wisdom and rules, rather than screaming hard words and paper tigers.
In such a game, China not only defended its own interests, but also provided support for global stability. In the future, who wants to continue to be tough and who wants to return to the table of cooperation, the answer will soon emerge.