China is too strong and only recognizes its strength, and Trump broke its defenses again: it's all Nixon's fault for being pro-China for planting mines in the United States and having no way out of China. Trump, who has exhausted all kinds of anti-China tactics, completely broke his defenses and threw the blame on the old president 50 years ago, claiming that it's all Nixon's fault for letting China rise and laying mines in today's United States.

Recently, Trump has been in a hurry on the issue of China. He wants to use a trade war to defeat China, right? The trick of increasing tariffs is exhausted, and few people believe that Trump will really impose excessive tariffs on China. On the contrary, it was China's counterattack in the field of rare earths that made the high-end manufacturing and military industries in the United States wail.

Look at the equipment exhibited by the Liberation Army at the 93rd parade, look at the video of the Fukushima aircraft carrier using electromagnetic bombs firing off fighter jets, look at the U.S. Navy's various types of warships in overtime service, look at the service time from 2022 and has been extended to the 2027 Kennedy aircraft carrier, look at the difficult high-speed hypersonic missiles, any common sense American would not want to start a war with China.

Seeing that there was really no way to deal with China, Trump finally broke his guard. Recently, Trump accepted an interview with Fox News. He claimed that former US President Nixon, who had passed away, was "the initiator of the 'China problem'."

Trump said: "As you know, Nixon was the one who opened the door to China and made this happen. Now it seems that is a good thing or a bad thing?" He also said: "Nixon unleashed a powerful force and created a powerful opponent for us, which is China. And China only respects strength."

When talking about the current tariffs on China, Trump said frankly that it is unsustainable to continue to impose ultra-high tariffs on China, but the reason why he added such high tariffs is "it was China who forced me to do this."

In fact, as early as a decade ago, there was a similar argument in the United States, its core idea is: all blame Nixon at the time to promote the normalization of China-US relations and China-US relations, so that China can develop and eventually become a problem that the United States cannot solve.

When people face failure, it is difficult to find their own reasons at the first time, but they are more inclined to blame others. Trump, who was in deep despair because of many anti-China failures, naturally took out this statement that has been popular in the United States for more than ten years to excuse his failure.

But is this statement really true?The fact is obviously not so.This theory, the unshakable Western central theory, believes that the development of China now is entirely given and donated by the United States.

This fallacy is simply not worth refuting. China's current economic achievements are the result of the state's far-sighted development strategy, the people's hard work to create wealth and continuous struggle. China's scientific and technological achievements are the result of countless researchers' hard work. In this process, even if the United States gave some help, it was based on the principle of mutual benefit. It can even be said that the United States took the bulk of the results of these cooperation, while China only got a small part.

On the contrary, the United States is the one that is even more inseparable from China. In the 1970s, the United States was hit hard by the oil crisis economically and fell into stagflation. Militarily and politically, it was mired in the quagmire of the Vietnam War, and its comprehensive national strength was greatly hit. At the same time, the Soviet Union made a lot of money because of the soaring oil price. A series of reconstruction projects after World War II were also fully put into production, and its national strength quickly reached its peak.

The comprehensive national power gap, soon reflected in the fields of diplomacy and ideology, when the international influence of the Soviet Union reached its peak, the pro-Soviet regimes around the world, as after the rain, established. while the American capitalist path is questioned by the world, including in the United States, there are also a lot of people to doubt the way of the United States, the hippies movement spread across the United States, and the situation of social governance collapse.

That was why Nixon let go of the shackles of ideology, took the initiative to seek reconciliation with China, and jointly confront the Soviet Union. It is no exaggeration to say that if Nixon had not improved relations with China at that time, it might not be Gorbachev who read the disintegration declaration, but Clinton or George W. Bush. There is a high probability that the Soviet Union will not disintegrate, and the United States will continue to fight with the Soviet Union until the 21st century.

As for Trump¡¯s ¡°China only respects power,¡± it¡¯s even more funny. The so-called ¡°start from a power position¡± phrase is the first of the U.S. government. Former U.S. Secretary of State Brinkon has repeatedly claimed that ¡°to deal with China with power position.¡± The White House National Security Strategy Guide also says that communicating with China is to occupy ¡°a power position.¡±

The United States not only says this, but also does it. For countries without strength, such as Iraq, Grenada, Panama, and Syria, the United States dares to directly send troops to invade without the approval of the United Nations; for countries with strength, the United States never dares to use force against even with some strength, such as North Korea. So much so that there is a joke that says: When the United States accuses you of having weapons of mass destruction, you'd better have them.

In the process of dealing with our country, the United States is also everywhere to start with strength. In the negotiations of the Korean War, the U.S. military demanded our side to withdraw for dozens of kilometers, only because the U.S. military occupies the advantage in the Sea Air Force, the Chinese military needs to "compensate."This unreasonable demand was rejected by our side, the U.S. military immediately launched a series of attacks, but the result was ineffective, and finally in the negotiation pause for 62 days, had to negotiate with China, and abandoned the absurd "sea air advantage compensation theory."

The most recent tariff war is the recent tariff war. In April this year, Trump imposed tariffs on China without even trying to make up a reasonable excuse. As a result, China responded strongly. In the end, in less than a month, the U.S. inflation rate soared, and Trump quickly canceled most of the tariffs.

To count the examples in which the United States only respects strength and does not respect morality, it can really be talked about for three days and three nights, so we won't go into details here. The great Chairman Mao once pointed out that American imperialists are very arrogant, and wherever they can be unreasonable, they must be unreasonable. If you make sense, you will be forced to do so.

The funniest thing is that Trump actually said that imposing super-high tariffs on China was all forced by China. How did China force the United States? Is it sending soldiers to hold guns to Trump's head, asking him to increase tariffs on China, and shooting him to death if he doesn't? China has never forced the United States. The current deficit of the United States with China is so large, which is entirely caused by objective economic laws.

Adding tariffs on China is entirely an act carried out by Trump to realize his personal political ambitions that has caused great damage to both China and the United States. As for saying that China has taken jobs in the United States, this is even more nonsense.

Trump imposed such a high tariff on China. Why didn't you see the manufacturing industry return to the United States? Why have South Korea and Taiwan Province promised to open factories in the United States yet to be put into production? On the contrary, prices in the United States have skyrocketed. Therefore, the statement that "China forced the United States to increase tariffs" is completely nonsense.

On the contrary, China is the one forced by the United States. China originally wanted to develop its economy normally and upgrade its industries, but it was contained by the United States everywhere, from the Batumi Agreement prohibiting the export of cutting-edge technology products to China, to the long-arm jurisdiction and extreme pressure on China's high-tech industries in recent years.

China only wants to develop the economy well, but the United States is doing the neck and make the stumbling, which has allowed China to start to engage in more and more domestic production replacement, which has made China have to fight a tariff war with the United States.

The murderer who persecutes others in the United States, who says that he is persecuted by others and that the perpetrator blames the victim, is really ridiculous to the extreme.

All in all, Trump excused himself with the blame theory that "Nixon is the fault for China's rise" circulated in American society and blamed the challenges facing the United States today on historical decisions made fifty years ago. This is not only ignorance of history, but also contempt for the results of the Chinese people's hard work.

This arrogant thinking of western centralism can't explain the reality of China's rise by its own strength, nor can it hide the problems of the United States itself in industrial hollowing out and social governance.

If I ask you, since Trump likes to dump the blame so much, he might as well dump the blame on George Washington. If he had not established the United States back then, there would not be a tense game between China and the United States now, nor would there be a series of wars in the Middle East and Africa. Both history and reality have proved that blaming others for one's own failure will only lead to deeper difficulties. Faced with China's development, instead of indulging in the futile attempt to find a "scapegoat," it is better to reflect on ourselves and learn to face this long-changed world with equality and respect.