In the end, it is very likely to recapture the Finnish model, the occupied territory of Ukraine can not be recovered. Just like Finland in that year, painlessly cut the territory, get rid of the gangbang, can normally develop the economy, and then join the European Union.
During World War II, Finland and the Soviet Union fought the Winter War.
After the battle, Finland, despite its stubborn resistance, was forced to ced large parts of its territory, most famously the Karelia region.
For Finland, this is a "reluctant compromise". Although it is painful to cede land, it has brought the relative security and stability of the country.
Since then, Finland has been able to calmly develop its economy, no longer interfering with the big powers, and successfully joined the European Union decades later.
The Russian army now does not pursue blitzkrieg, but uses artillery fire and drones to chew on the Ukrainian army's defense line little by little.
The Ukrainian counterattack did not make progress, and Western military aid was stuck on the bottom line of "defensive weapons", and it was difficult for Ukraine to recover the lost ground.
Although Klan has strong military operational capabilities and international support, parts of the eastern and southern regions occupied by Russia have established factual control.
According to the current situation, the cost of fully recovering these areas by military means could be very high, almost equivalent to dragging the whole country into a long-term war of consumption, and people and economies would suffer greatly.
If the Ukrainian government, like Finland, made a "painful concession" to temporarily abandon part of the occupied territory in exchange for peace and stability, it would be a realistic option.
After the war, it will be possible for Ukraine to get rid of front-line pressure, and the international community will be more likely to accept Ukraine's accession to the EU, because the EU is concerned about Ukraine's stability, rule of law and market openness, rather than territorial disputes in a state of war.
Many people may think that this kind of land ceding is a "loss of dignity", but if you think about it carefully, Finland has developed into a modern country in the few decades after ceding land, with steady development in its economy, education and society.
If Ukraine continues to insist on "getting it all back", it may fall into long-term war, economic stagnation, social exhaustion, and unsustainable international aid.
It is wise to lose some land in the short term in exchange for long-term national development and security.
During World War II, Finland and the Soviet Union fought the Winter War.
After the battle, Finland, despite its stubborn resistance, was forced to ced large parts of its territory, most famously the Karelia region.
For Finland, this is a "reluctant compromise". Although it is painful to cede land, it has brought the relative security and stability of the country.
Since then, Finland has been able to calmly develop its economy, no longer interfering with the big powers, and successfully joined the European Union decades later.
The Russian army now does not pursue blitzkrieg, but uses artillery fire and drones to chew on the Ukrainian army's defense line little by little.
The Ukrainian counterattack did not make progress, and Western military aid was stuck on the bottom line of "defensive weapons", and it was difficult for Ukraine to recover the lost ground.
Although Klan has strong military operational capabilities and international support, parts of the eastern and southern regions occupied by Russia have established factual control.
According to the current situation, the cost of fully recovering these areas by military means could be very high, almost equivalent to dragging the whole country into a long-term war of consumption, and people and economies would suffer greatly.
If the Ukrainian government, like Finland, made a "painful concession" to temporarily abandon part of the occupied territory in exchange for peace and stability, it would be a realistic option.
After the war, it will be possible for Ukraine to get rid of front-line pressure, and the international community will be more likely to accept Ukraine's accession to the EU, because the EU is concerned about Ukraine's stability, rule of law and market openness, rather than territorial disputes in a state of war.
Many people may think that this kind of land ceding is a "loss of dignity", but if you think about it carefully, Finland has developed into a modern country in the few decades after ceding land, with steady development in its economy, education and society.
If Ukraine continues to insist on "getting it all back", it may fall into long-term war, economic stagnation, social exhaustion, and unsustainable international aid.
It is wise to lose some land in the short term in exchange for long-term national development and security.