In the coming days, there will be major events between China and the United States, and what tone has Trump set for this key meeting?

On the 24th, Sino-US economic and trade negotiations in Malaysia were officially launched. The representatives sent by China are the leaders of Sino-US trade that we are familiar with; while the representatives of the United States are the Treasury Secretary and the Trade Representative-both of whom are in the Trump administration. A core figure who holds real power and is in charge of economic and trade.

Knowing friends understand that negotiations can be fruitful, the key is to look at "people".If the people sent by the two sides do not have the right to decide, talk half a day and still have to continuously request the domestic, it is basically equal to a white talk. and this time the two sides sent are people who can "take a deal" within the scope of authority, what does this explain? Explain that neither of the two sides intends to go through the field, but really want to sit down, clear the issue and do things.This pragmatic attitude, in itself, is a positive signal, and also laid the basis for substantial progress in negotiations.

Malaysia¡¯s talks are not just about resolving the economic friction ahead. The more important task is to pave the way for the following major events-on October 30th, Chinese and American leaders may meet in South Korea.If you can now catch up with this point of time before the concrete, trivial economic and trade issues, the small consensus can be reached first, wait until the two heads of state meet, you can turn around the road less, directly focus on the big direction, determine the main tone.

Malaysian talks have just progressed, and Trump is also preparing for boarding flights to South Korea. He took the initiative to say 11 words to reporters, "I think everything will come to a successful end",This sounds simple, but releases at least two layers of signal. The first floor is for the outside world to listen,He wanted to seize the initiative and first put forward the expectation of "success", which not only appeared to be confident, but also wanted to drive the pace of negotiations; The other level is for the United States to listen.After all, the mid-term elections are approaching, and he has to let voters feel that he is tough and capable of getting things done when dealing with China, which is accumulating political capital for himself.

And he added immediately after "Everyone will be very happy",These words actually include China. After all, when China and the United States talk about economic and trade, we are also important parties, and "everyone" naturally includes us. That is to say, Trump believes that his sincerity will make China happy in this negotiation.There is a high probability behind this that the United States has also figured it out thoroughly. Being tough alone cannot do it. It has to make some real concessions or exchange interests with China. For example, if we purchase more American agricultural products, they will open up some advanced technologies to us appropriately; If we relax the export of rare earths, he will relax the restrictions on our new energy companies in the US market. This kind of "you give in, I give in" operation is not uncommon in the history of Sino-US negotiations. Just like once before, we bought billions of dollars more soybeans from the United States to help their farmers solve their urgent needs. The United States subsequently lowered tariffs on some Chinese home appliances. This is not a question of who suffers and who takes advantage, but finding a balance point that both sides can accept and benefit from.

After all, whether it¡¯s Malaysia¡¯s economic and trade negotiations or Trump¡¯s ¡°everything will end well¡± before boarding, the core objectives are consistent, creating a good atmosphere for subsequent high-level meetings and promoting substantial results for dialogue.We will pay attention to these signals, not because we love to listen to beautiful words, but from which we see the attitude of the U.S. side willing to communicate pragmatically and see the possibility of ¡°interest exchange¡±. China and the United States can sit down and have a good talk, with less tossing and more cooperation.