He has been prime minister for a few days, but probably the mood of the high market early is not good.

She may have to remember the past of those Japanese political predecessors, such as the one who also wanted to rely on China's tough position, but eventually caused Japan to fall into strategic passivity, Abe Abe, and her political tutor.

When Abe came to power for the second time, he returned with a strong man's gesture, trying to "re-shape Japan" through constitution and military expansion, but the reality is that he took several years to make China-Japan relations out of the ice. while CaoÊÐÔçÃç, the right-wing politician known as "female version of Abe", found himself in a more difficult situation than his predecessors.

What embarrassed her the most was the delayed congratulatory message from China.

In the press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the reporter of Japan's "Read and Sell News" asked directly: "The Chinese side needs to send a congratulatory telephone, the prime minister of the high market, the Chinese side?"Our spokesman Guo Jiangkun answered very cleverly: the appropriate arrangements have been made in accordance with diplomatic practice.

Not saying, not saying, not saying, the underlying word behind the diplomatic wording is: your past words and actions, we have not forgotten.

Historical account, is the high market unavoidable canyon.

The "tough injury" of Gaoshi early seedlings is too obvious.

Visit the Yasukuni Shrine many times-it enshrines Class A war criminals of World War II; Publicly question the part of "Murayama talk" that acknowledges the history of aggression; He even made a big rhetoric on the Taiwan Province issue, saying that "Japan should consider helping to defend Taiwan Province", which touched China's core interests.

The question of historical cognition, for the relations between China and Japan, is the ground, the ground is not solid, how to build a building on it?

Look at the four political documents of China and Japan, from the Joint Declaration of 1972 to the subsequent Treaty of Peace and Friendship, the core is one: Respect each other and do not touch each other's core interests.

Abe was able to warm Sino-Japanese relations up because he did not mess around on these fundamental issues. Now Gaoshi Zaomiao wants to muddle through with just saying "important neighbor"? That's too naive.

Giving olive branches and a knife.

More to see through the two-faceted high-market early morning, is her draft political speech.

On the surface, it is said that China is an "important neighbor" and wants to hold a summit dialogue to promote "strategic mutual benefit." However, it turns around and says that China and Japan have "issues worthy of attention" in the security field, and that defense expenses will be increased to 2% of GDP and arms export restrictions will be relaxed.

Isn't this a typical example of "holding a knife while holding an olive branch"?

Even more striking is her seemingly good move to China-Russia, which came out on the third day of office, saying that it was necessary to discuss with the United States and deploy the Tifong medium-range missile system in Japan.

The system is a key component of the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy, covering China¡¯s coast and Russia¡¯s Far East.

Gao Shi's operation seems to be showing goodwill to China and Russia, but it only pays lip service. After all, how can she have the final say on this missile matter?

Her real goal is the upcoming visit of US President Trump.

She is preparing a ¡°big package¡± for Trump: buying pickups that are not suitable for Japanese consumption habits at all, a lot of American soybeans and liquefied natural gas, she wants to put Trump in favor, China doesn¡¯t buy, I come to buy!

Such a smart little girl who doesn¡¯t understand?

Internal and external troubles forced her to bow her head

The reason high-market early-size so quickly to lower the gesture, really because the domestic situation is too difficult to see.

Japanese government debt has exceeded 250% of GDP, high inflation, the yen fell to 151, the pressure of ordinary households is high.

Politically, it is even more precarious. The Liberal Democratic Party has to cooperate with the right-wing Reform Council to barely maintain a majority. The Komeito Party, which could have served as a "buffer" between China and Japan, has withdrawn from the alliance. She is now a thoroughly "weak prime minister".

So only three days after taking office, she was eager to send an invitation to China for talks through diplomatic channels. On the surface, it is to improve relations, but in fact it is pushed into a corner by the economy-Japan can't do without China in energy, supply chain and export market.

Why doesn't China buy it?

In the face of sanae takaichi's "show of kindness", China's response is clear: listen to his words and observe his deeds.

In a short period of time, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs twice stressed that Japan should abide by the principles of the four political documents between China and Japan and keep the bottom line of history and the Taiwan Province issue. There is no congratulations in the response, which is the clearest attitude.

North Korea's response was more direct-shortly after Takashi took office, it fired a ballistic missile into the eastern sea, breaking a 167-day silence. This is a warning to Tokyo in the strongest possible way: Don't play tricks.

China's "silent diplomacy" is actually a very clever response. The delayed congratulatory message is like a mirror that reflects the reality that Takashii Harami and even the whole of Japan have long refused to face:

When you are economically dependent on China, but politically only the head of the United States is the direction; in the mouth to cooperate, but in the hand to mow the knife, this strategy of the mouse and the mouse, in this era has been completely ineffective.

Japan's strategic trouble, not a day's cold

Today's predicament seems to be her personal political retribution, but it is actually the total outbreak of Japan's 30-year strategic mistakes.

In the 1990s, Japan firmly believed in the "collapse of China" theory and formulated a series of policies waiting for the fall of China. What happened? Not only did China not collapse, but its total economic output surpassed Japan in 2008, and now its military strength is also in full swing.

Japan had the opportunity to adjust its route-the China-Japan-Korea Free Trade Area negotiations around 2010 were a turning point. However, with the departure of several Japanese politicians who advocated cooperation, the policy was pulled back to the old road of "containing China".

Since then, Japan's diplomacy has lost its focus and can only cover up anxiety by "showing muscles".The proposal to raise defence spending to 2% of GDP seems to be tough, the reality is only a continuation of this old thinking.

But the reality is cruel: Chinese ship cruise has become normal, and the simulated blockade of the ancient Strait has prevented Japan from rushing.

The Chinese letter, which has not arrived late, does not make Japan a good taste, but this diplomatic signal is clear enough to listen to its views, from history to reality, and look at the decisions and actions of the Japanese side.