Article Statement: This article was published only in the headline today, refused to be reproduced

After being countered by China, the Netherlands hurriedly called Beijing, but it still didn't mean to admit its mistake and apologize, just solved the problem blindly. At this time, China has set off the second card. What is the specific content? German media publicly ridiculed the Netherlands. Why did they do this?

A few days ago, the Netherlands suddenly "forcibly took over" AXA Semiconductor, a subsidiary of a Chinese company. In response, China quickly took countermeasures and implemented a chip cut-off. At the same time, Christophe Fukai, CEO of Dutch lithography giant ASML, said that China may give up using their lithography machines and implement countermeasures on rare earth supply. In this situation, Dutch Economy Minister Vincent Karemans called Beijing and talked with Wang Wentao, Minister of Commerce of China, to exchange views on resolving the problem. However, judging from Karemans 'subsequent statement, the Netherlands only wanted to negotiate, refused to admit its mistakes for its actions, and did not intend to apologize. In response, Germany's "Der Spiegel" magazine published an article directly mocking the Netherlands for "stealing chickens but not losing rice" and bluntly saying that they had made extremely stupid mistakes.

In fact, the approach of the Dutch government, many people feel ¡°unthinkable¡±, because there is absolutely no interest. However, the current Prime Minister of the Netherlands Shoff has long resigned, he is now only guarding the Prime Minister of the government, and by the end of October has resigned. Therefore, Shoff made another big deal, can also push the responsibility to the next government. As for the dramatic decline in the relationship between the Netherlands and China, and also lost the credibility of economic trade and government credibility, which has nothing to do with Shoff. Instead, Shoff through this thing indicated the United States, and thereafter is likely to have a better development in the European Commission, the European Parliament.

This kind of situation abounds within the EU. For example, former German Foreign Minister Baerbock, whose series of words and deeds during her term of office were considered to be "serving the interests of the United States", completely ignoring the interests of Germany and even the European Union. However, after stepping down as German foreign minister, Baerbock was nominated as the president of the UN General Assembly, which caused an uproar in Germany. Heusgen, former chairman of the Munich Security Conference, publicly questioned the German government why it replaced senior diplomats with Baerbock. He also bluntly said that this practice was very "shameless". However, the strong opposition in Germany did not prevent Baerbock from being elected president of the UN General Assembly. It is widely believed that Baerbock uses the president of the UN General Assembly as a "springboard", and she will run for important positions in more powerful international organizations in the future.

It can be seen from these situations that exchanging national interests for personal future has become a "routine operation" in Western countries. After all, the biggest loss for those who led the incident was to resign and step down, but they had already benefited enough from the "middleman". Moreover, if these Western politicians "win the gamble", they can increase their political achievements. If they "lose the gamble", the risks and losses will be borne by the country and the people. This completely cost-free "business" will naturally attract more Western politicians, but everyone chooses a different direction.

But the consequences caused by these selfish politicians are very serious. Regarding the issue of Ansei Semiconductor, China not only directly cut off chip supplies, but also raised a second trump card without the Netherlands admitting its mistakes or apologizing. Anshi Semiconductor's China company has announced that they will not implement orders from their headquarters in the Netherlands. Wentai Technology, the parent company of Anshi Semiconductor, has completely taken over the Anshi China company and expelled all Dutch personnel. This situation has made European and even Western auto companies feel cold, because although Anshi Semiconductor is not very competitive, its chip types are very complete and its production capacity is large, making many auto companies use their products and have become a global auto industry. Now, China has cut off chip supplies and allowed Anshi China to "start a new stove", which means that the Netherlands has only robbed one shell company and has also implicated the entire Western auto industry.

Moreover, the Anshi Semiconductor incident may continue to ferment because its nature is too bad. After the end of World War II, the colonial systems of European countries were disintegrated by the United States and the Soviet Union, which caused Western countries to change their methods and "plunder" the third world through goods and capital.

Even the United States, which has become the "world hegemon", has not robbed other countries' assets so nakedly. What the Netherlands did was to go back to the "robbery" of the West against China a hundred years ago. Moreover, China and the Netherlands have neither geographical contradictions nor economic and trade competition, but their assets have been "robbed". Seeing this situation, no Chinese company can do business in Europe with confidence. Therefore, the ultimate impact of the Nexperia incident is that the economic and trade exchanges between China and the West are becoming fewer and fewer, and the "new cold war" situation has substantially taken shape. This is not good for Europe, but it is the situation that the United States wants to see most. Because of the formation of the "New Cold War", Europe can only be tied to the "chariot" of the United States, and there is no strategic autonomy at all.

In the case of China, the Anchor Semiconductor does not have any core technology, its products have many alternatives in China, but the biggest problem is to eliminate the possibility of other countries to "forcibly seize Chinese assets."In fact, China adds to rare-earth export controls, charges special port charges on U.S. ships, all indicate that China should use laws and regulatory tools, give the international community rules, so that the economic and trade system is truly fair and fair.