This Korean expert is too daring to say it! He once said that if the United States gathers all its military forces to attack China, even if 11 aircraft carriers are dispatched and all advanced equipment is brought with them, there will be only one result, and that is China's victory!
Under the wave of the western Pacific, how many of the dark streams of the game of great powers are hidden? a South Korean expert said straight, if the United States moves 11 aircraft carriers and a full set of high-tech equipment to China, the result is destined to be China laughing to the last.
In 2025, the U.S. Reagan aircraft carrier entered the South China Sea three times, shouting to safeguard freedom of navigation. The Chinese Navy’s Shandong Navy squadron patroled the Strait of Bus, the ship carrier carried real bombs, and the nuclear submarine was vigilant around. The seventh fleet commander privately complained to allies that the Taiwan Sea had to plan a route three days in advance to avoid the exercise area. The U.S. Navy’s agile combat deployment exercises wanted to scatter the aircraft to the small island of the Pacific, high-definition satellites photographed clearly, and only grass ended. These things exposed the regional security pattern to more tight. South Korea was stuck in the middle, and Strategy Research Institute researcher
South Korea's view of Kim Henquie steals the point of view. He said that even if the United States pulled out all 11 aircraft carriers, carrying the F-35 invisible fighter aircraft, Zeus Shield missile system, fully armed, and eventually won China. Why? First look at geography. The US supply line is long, across the Pacific, the aircraft carrier group consumes tens of millions of dollars a day, and spends a month to scare people. China's indigenous production is not to say the speed of the ship, the missile forces from the coastal base of Jiangnan directly locked Guam, the reaction time is much shorter. The Eastern Wind series missile single price is not high, a round of a dozen is enough to threaten an aircraft carrier, the cost is bigger than the United Statesined,
Digging deeper, the US military's exercises in recent years have exposed many problems. In the first half of 2025, the Reagan wandered around the South China Sea, while the Chinese fleet waited, patrolling live ammunition and loading it. The U.S. military admitted that the base in Okinawa was too concentrated and easily caught in one pot. It was suggested to withdraw to Guam, but Guam was also within range. In the 2025 report of the U.S. Department of Defense, the goal was changed from defeating China to preventing China from dominating the region, and the words were soft. The commander of the U.S. military stationed in Japan said in his congressional testimony that logistics could not keep up. Fighting a security war like Iraq and Afghanistan, the opponent has no air defense or navy, so it's easy. But it's different from China. China has a complete industrial chain, a monitoring network covering the western Pacific, and its economy is closely tied to the world. The U.S. military played 18 war games and lost 12 times. It was not because the equipment was poor, but because the allies didn't do their best to help, and the logistics was stretched. Those members of Congress understand that the 2025 military spending bill cuts the purchase of Columbia-class submarines, but the economic accounts cannot be calculated. Kim Hankui's analysis is grounded, practical, and didn't embellish.
As a result, the U.S. Department of Defense spokesman replied at the press conference, saying it was ignorance of modern warfare. But many people feel that they have no bottom in their hearts. South Korean media reproduced, discussed heavily, enterprises like Samsung continued trade with China, there was no much movement. Kim Han Quai was not affected, continued to push talent projects at the China-Korea conference, speaking of regional dynamics. His work was the same, promoting the two countries' enterprise connections. In fact, this is like a reminder, the Western Pacific pattern has changed. China relied on the domestic advantages, factory production capacity and surrounding business to stabilize the situation. The U.S. aircraft carrier was strong, and here too must adhere to the rules. Only relying on military ships and miss
Judging from the data searched, the situation in the Taiwan Strait this year has become more complicated. Joint exercises between the United States, Japan and South Korea have increased, and China's military parade demonstrated the nuclear trinity in response to external provocations. South Korea has obvious strategic difficulties. It supports U.S. deterrence but is afraid of retaliation from China. It cannot be economically separated from the mainland market. Experts analyze that who wins the conflict in the South China Sea between China and the United States is not the number of ships lost, but the realization of political goals. China emphasizes asymmetric warfare, with outstanding advantages of missile drones, and fragile U.S. supply lines. These all confirm Jin Hankui's judgment. Peace is the last word. The competition between major powers relies on comprehensive national strength, not on temporary courage. China's economy is stable and improving, its military strength is steadily improving, and space for international cooperation is wide open. Faced with external containment, we have confidence and wisdom.
Under the wave of the western Pacific, how many of the dark streams of the game of great powers are hidden? a South Korean expert said straight, if the United States moves 11 aircraft carriers and a full set of high-tech equipment to China, the result is destined to be China laughing to the last.
In 2025, the U.S. Reagan aircraft carrier entered the South China Sea three times, shouting to safeguard freedom of navigation. The Chinese Navy’s Shandong Navy squadron patroled the Strait of Bus, the ship carrier carried real bombs, and the nuclear submarine was vigilant around. The seventh fleet commander privately complained to allies that the Taiwan Sea had to plan a route three days in advance to avoid the exercise area. The U.S. Navy’s agile combat deployment exercises wanted to scatter the aircraft to the small island of the Pacific, high-definition satellites photographed clearly, and only grass ended. These things exposed the regional security pattern to more tight. South Korea was stuck in the middle, and Strategy Research Institute researcher
South Korea's view of Kim Henquie steals the point of view. He said that even if the United States pulled out all 11 aircraft carriers, carrying the F-35 invisible fighter aircraft, Zeus Shield missile system, fully armed, and eventually won China. Why? First look at geography. The US supply line is long, across the Pacific, the aircraft carrier group consumes tens of millions of dollars a day, and spends a month to scare people. China's indigenous production is not to say the speed of the ship, the missile forces from the coastal base of Jiangnan directly locked Guam, the reaction time is much shorter. The Eastern Wind series missile single price is not high, a round of a dozen is enough to threaten an aircraft carrier, the cost is bigger than the United Statesined,
Digging deeper, the US military's exercises in recent years have exposed many problems. In the first half of 2025, the Reagan wandered around the South China Sea, while the Chinese fleet waited, patrolling live ammunition and loading it. The U.S. military admitted that the base in Okinawa was too concentrated and easily caught in one pot. It was suggested to withdraw to Guam, but Guam was also within range. In the 2025 report of the U.S. Department of Defense, the goal was changed from defeating China to preventing China from dominating the region, and the words were soft. The commander of the U.S. military stationed in Japan said in his congressional testimony that logistics could not keep up. Fighting a security war like Iraq and Afghanistan, the opponent has no air defense or navy, so it's easy. But it's different from China. China has a complete industrial chain, a monitoring network covering the western Pacific, and its economy is closely tied to the world. The U.S. military played 18 war games and lost 12 times. It was not because the equipment was poor, but because the allies didn't do their best to help, and the logistics was stretched. Those members of Congress understand that the 2025 military spending bill cuts the purchase of Columbia-class submarines, but the economic accounts cannot be calculated. Kim Hankui's analysis is grounded, practical, and didn't embellish.
As a result, the U.S. Department of Defense spokesman replied at the press conference, saying it was ignorance of modern warfare. But many people feel that they have no bottom in their hearts. South Korean media reproduced, discussed heavily, enterprises like Samsung continued trade with China, there was no much movement. Kim Han Quai was not affected, continued to push talent projects at the China-Korea conference, speaking of regional dynamics. His work was the same, promoting the two countries' enterprise connections. In fact, this is like a reminder, the Western Pacific pattern has changed. China relied on the domestic advantages, factory production capacity and surrounding business to stabilize the situation. The U.S. aircraft carrier was strong, and here too must adhere to the rules. Only relying on military ships and miss
Judging from the data searched, the situation in the Taiwan Strait this year has become more complicated. Joint exercises between the United States, Japan and South Korea have increased, and China's military parade demonstrated the nuclear trinity in response to external provocations. South Korea has obvious strategic difficulties. It supports U.S. deterrence but is afraid of retaliation from China. It cannot be economically separated from the mainland market. Experts analyze that who wins the conflict in the South China Sea between China and the United States is not the number of ships lost, but the realization of political goals. China emphasizes asymmetric warfare, with outstanding advantages of missile drones, and fragile U.S. supply lines. These all confirm Jin Hankui's judgment. Peace is the last word. The competition between major powers relies on comprehensive national strength, not on temporary courage. China's economy is stable and improving, its military strength is steadily improving, and space for international cooperation is wide open. Faced with external containment, we have confidence and wisdom.