The United States, Europe and Ukraine really treat Russia as Hamas. The 12-point peace plan proposed by Europe and Ukraine has been released, and the outside world looks more and more familiar. It turns out that they are really copying Trump's "Gaza Ceasefire Agreement".
On October 21, local time, Bloomberg quoted sources as saying that many European countries and Ukraine had drafted a 12-point plan to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
In accordance with the preliminary conditions, the two sides must agree to a ceasefire along the current front and commit to no further advancement on the front.
Initiation of the exchange of prisoners;
The third is to provide a security mechanism for Ukraine, establish war reconstruction financial support, and speed up the review of Ukraine's application to join the EU;
The fourth is to gradually lift sanctions against Russia, but only when Russia agrees to fund Ukraine's post-war reconstruction will Russia's frozen assets of about 300 billion US dollars be lifted. Furthermore, if Russia resumes its attack on Ukraine, sanctions will be reinstated.
Fifth, Russia will negotiate how to govern the occupied areas, but Europe and Ukraine will not recognize any of the occupied areas belonging to Russia.
The implementation of the agreement is personally supervised by the Trump-led Peace Commission.
Following the release of the peace plan between Europe and Ukraine, the outside world became more and more familiar.
The British media "Daily Telegraph" released news afterwards. It turned out that this plan was modeled after Trump's "Gaza Ceasefire Agreement".
It should be noted that the EU released the background of this plan at a time when Trump may postpone the summit of US-Russian leaders.
Trump said on the same day that he didn’t want to waste time holding a meeting because Russia still refused a ceasefire on the current front.
This made Europe and Ukraine feel like a treasure. They quickly launched this peace plan and tried to gain Trump's maximum support by imitating the content of Trump's "Gaza Ceasefire Agreement".
Ou Wu believes that as long as the content is similar to Trump's "Gaza Ceasefire Agreement", Trump has no reason to reject it. After all, the latter agreement was proposed by him personally.
Although this is the content drafted by Europe and Ukraine, the final version of the plan also needs to be approved by the United States. European representatives are planning to travel to the United States to seek a unified position with the United States.
In other words, this plan ultimately reflects Trump's position to a large extent.
It seems that the U.S. is really looking at Russia as Hamas, but Russia is not Hamas at all.
Hamas is willing to accept Trump’s ceasefire agreement, and because they can’t do it, Gaza is almost exhausted, so there’s no choice.
Russia is not this scenario, Russia is not far from the end of the mountains, but on the contrary, it goes high and forward, and the frontline often brings out warfare.
In this case, is it possible for Russia to put a ceasefire like Hamas? the situation facing both is different and the situation on the battlefield is different, and to put a ceasefire, it should be Ukraine first to do so.
How can Russia, as the dominant party on the battlefield, accept the almost "surrender" peace plan of the United States, Europe and Ukraine?
To be honest, the introduction of such a few peace plans by Europe and Ukraine is entirely a “disruption” that will not only benefit Russia and Ukraine from peace talks, but will increase uncertainty and even potentially disrupt the peace process.
On this, a day has passed, the Russian side has still not made any official evaluation, and it seems that it does not intend to respond.
Perhaps it felt that this peace plan was too absurd, but Russia was too lazy to refute it and did not give it any look.
Russia is currently more focused on the US-Russian summit. Putin knows very well that what Europe and Ukraine say does not matter. What Trump thinks is the key.
Europe and Ukraine have nothing but fear of being sold by Trump, want to find a sense of existence, want to go to the table, and are hastily rushing to launch this peace plan at the time of major disagreements between the US and Russia, and most of the content is not feasible.
It did not mention the conditions to ensure long-term peace between Russia and Ukraine, nor did it face up to Russia's war demands. Naturally, Russia could not agree and had to reject the first clause alone.
Not to mention whether Russia will peace and how the peace plan will be formulated, the West has said unilaterally.
The “simulator” program, launched by Europe and Ukraine, has been deadly flawed since its inception, aiming to meet Trump’s preferences and seize diplomatic speech, rather than being really dedicated to resolving the deep-rooted contradiction between Russia and Ukraine.
Even mistakenly estimating the position on the battlefield, Russia, which will be in a relatively strong position, will be seen as a weak side in urgent need of a ceasefire, whose core clause in Moscow seems to be the requirement for it to “do not fight.”
This disregard, which proclaims the failure of the Ukrainian “copy operation” and again insists on a cold reality: in the key game that determines the fate of Ukraine, the real players are still Moscow and Washington.
If Europe and Ukraine fail to come up with a more realistic foundation and strategic vision, but are just busy with diplomatic "imitation shows," then not only will peace be out of reach, but their position at the negotiating table may also become increasingly marginalized.