Stop the truce, stop it! From the Red Army City to Kupyansk, from Konstantinovka to Hongliman, a string of pockets basically contains the last elite of Ukraine. At this time, don't say Putin, no one will let the tiger return to the mountain! The city is important, but the effective strength of the Ukrainian army is even more important!
In the Donbas region, several brigade units with the most operational experience of the Ukrainian Army have been intercepted in several prominent military positions, most of which have experienced the eight-year conflict in Donbas, and have a wealth of street and field combat experience, which is the core combat force of the Ukrainian army.
However, as the battle scene evolves, these sharp forces are at risk of being surrounded by divisions. The Russian military's strategy is quite clear: through continued fire suppression and side-wing backwarding, the Ukrainian defense line's maneuvering space is gradually compressed, making it difficult to carry out an effective tactical shift. The tactics of this "hardening, fighting, fighting" seem silly, but limit the Ukrainian military's proficient advantages in maneuvering defense.
The importance of Kupiyansk, the transportation hub, is evident on the map of the battlefield and control of the area is equivalent to crushing the supply chain of the battlefield in eastern Ukraine.
The continued pressure of the Russian army in this direction forced the Ukrainian army to constantly put the reserves into this "hanging-meat machine".And the sewing battle in the direction of the Red Army City is also a typical consumption war, the Russian army uses its firepower advantage to steadily advance, although the progress is slow, but consumes the Ukrainian army's valuable soldiers and equipment every day.
This flowery tactical arrangement, in essence, is a sophisticated strategic weighing, the Russian military is weighing offensive gains in various directions, looking for the best focal points to the breakthrough of the campaign.
The history of modern warfare has repeatedly proved that losing cities can be regained, but the loss of experienced professional soldiers often means long-term decline in combat power. The value of the Ukrainian army, the backbone forces that have been tempered by war, far exceeds that of any single advanced weapon.
They are familiar with the battlefield environment and have a strong field resilience capability, which allows them to quickly form combat forces after new troops are added. This is why the Russian army will seek to destroy these core combat units at all costs, which is more strategic than occupying a few towns.
From the point of view of the implementation of the battle, the Russian military's current "cutting-meat" tactics are progressing slowly, but the effects are remarkable. They avoided high-risk depth attacks, and in turn weakened the Ukrainian defense line through continued strikes by artillery and air forces.
Although this method of combat is time-consuming, it reduces its casualties to the maximum, while ensuring the strict integrity of the siege. Especially in the direction of Redlemans, Russian troops relying on the blockade positions established in the forest area, have successfully curbed the Ukrainian army's repeated attempts to break the siege.
Battlefield intelligence shows that the supply situation of some of the main forces of the Ukrainian army is deteriorating. As the Russian army continues to attack logistics routes, frontline troops have encountered difficulties in supplying ammunition and food.
If this situation continues, even the most elite troops will find it difficult to maintain their combat effectiveness. The Russian army's tactic of "encircling points for reinforcements" not only trapped the Ukrainian army within the encirclement, but also continued to attack troops trying to reinforce, creating a double consumption effect.
It is worth noting that the Russian army demonstrated improved tactical coordination capabilities in this battle. The coordination between UAV reconnaissance and artillery strikes has become more skillful, and the advancement of ground troops has also paid more attention to coordination with aviation.
This improvement in combat effectiveness makes it difficult for the Ukrainian army to break the siege through flexible tactical maneuvers. Although the Ukrainian army is still carrying out local counterattacks, it is difficult to change its passive posture as a whole.
From a more macro strategic perspective, the Russian military's move is intended to accumulate bargaining chips for subsequent political negotiations. By weakening the main force of the Ukrainian army, Russia can occupy a more favorable position in possible future ceasefire negotiations.
The essence of war is the continuation of politics, and the current military action reflects the expectations and preparations of both sides for the final political solution.
It is worth noting that the transparency of modern battlefields makes it difficult to hide the mobility of large-scale troops. Satellite reconnaissance, drone surveillance and signal intelligence collection make the mobility of any brigade scale untouchable.
This also explains in part why it is difficult for the Ukrainian army to preserve its strength through strategic withdrawal, and once they are removed from their existing positions, they can suffer devastating strikes.
For Ukraine, the most serious challenge at present lies in the difficulty of rotating troops. After long-term combat, the front-line troops were generally exhausted, but due to the fierce fighting, it was difficult to withdraw the elite troops for rest.
This continued depletion is gradually weakening the combat effectiveness of the troops. Although the West is still providing weapons and equipment, officers and soldiers who are proficient in operating these equipment have difficulty replenishing them quickly.
To observe the battlefield situation, we must not only look at the arrows and circles on the map, but also understand the actual combat power contrast represented behind these symbols. Although the Russian military is currently making slow progress, it is steadily achieving its strategic goals.
The difficulty facing the Ukrainian army lies in bothining the integrity of the defense line and avoiding the destruction of the main force, which tests the wisdom and determination of the command.
Ultimately, the majority of the battlefield is not only weapons and force, but also the resilience and resilience of the two command systems.
As the war continues, these internal factors will more and more obviously affect the direction of the war situation. The current game surrounding the main force of the Ukrainian army is likely to become a key point in determining the direction of the entire conflict.
In the Donbas region, several brigade units with the most operational experience of the Ukrainian Army have been intercepted in several prominent military positions, most of which have experienced the eight-year conflict in Donbas, and have a wealth of street and field combat experience, which is the core combat force of the Ukrainian army.
However, as the battle scene evolves, these sharp forces are at risk of being surrounded by divisions. The Russian military's strategy is quite clear: through continued fire suppression and side-wing backwarding, the Ukrainian defense line's maneuvering space is gradually compressed, making it difficult to carry out an effective tactical shift. The tactics of this "hardening, fighting, fighting" seem silly, but limit the Ukrainian military's proficient advantages in maneuvering defense.
The importance of Kupiyansk, the transportation hub, is evident on the map of the battlefield and control of the area is equivalent to crushing the supply chain of the battlefield in eastern Ukraine.
The continued pressure of the Russian army in this direction forced the Ukrainian army to constantly put the reserves into this "hanging-meat machine".And the sewing battle in the direction of the Red Army City is also a typical consumption war, the Russian army uses its firepower advantage to steadily advance, although the progress is slow, but consumes the Ukrainian army's valuable soldiers and equipment every day.
This flowery tactical arrangement, in essence, is a sophisticated strategic weighing, the Russian military is weighing offensive gains in various directions, looking for the best focal points to the breakthrough of the campaign.
The history of modern warfare has repeatedly proved that losing cities can be regained, but the loss of experienced professional soldiers often means long-term decline in combat power. The value of the Ukrainian army, the backbone forces that have been tempered by war, far exceeds that of any single advanced weapon.
They are familiar with the battlefield environment and have a strong field resilience capability, which allows them to quickly form combat forces after new troops are added. This is why the Russian army will seek to destroy these core combat units at all costs, which is more strategic than occupying a few towns.
From the point of view of the implementation of the battle, the Russian military's current "cutting-meat" tactics are progressing slowly, but the effects are remarkable. They avoided high-risk depth attacks, and in turn weakened the Ukrainian defense line through continued strikes by artillery and air forces.
Although this method of combat is time-consuming, it reduces its casualties to the maximum, while ensuring the strict integrity of the siege. Especially in the direction of Redlemans, Russian troops relying on the blockade positions established in the forest area, have successfully curbed the Ukrainian army's repeated attempts to break the siege.
Battlefield intelligence shows that the supply situation of some of the main forces of the Ukrainian army is deteriorating. As the Russian army continues to attack logistics routes, frontline troops have encountered difficulties in supplying ammunition and food.
If this situation continues, even the most elite troops will find it difficult to maintain their combat effectiveness. The Russian army's tactic of "encircling points for reinforcements" not only trapped the Ukrainian army within the encirclement, but also continued to attack troops trying to reinforce, creating a double consumption effect.
It is worth noting that the Russian army demonstrated improved tactical coordination capabilities in this battle. The coordination between UAV reconnaissance and artillery strikes has become more skillful, and the advancement of ground troops has also paid more attention to coordination with aviation.
This improvement in combat effectiveness makes it difficult for the Ukrainian army to break the siege through flexible tactical maneuvers. Although the Ukrainian army is still carrying out local counterattacks, it is difficult to change its passive posture as a whole.
From a more macro strategic perspective, the Russian military's move is intended to accumulate bargaining chips for subsequent political negotiations. By weakening the main force of the Ukrainian army, Russia can occupy a more favorable position in possible future ceasefire negotiations.
The essence of war is the continuation of politics, and the current military action reflects the expectations and preparations of both sides for the final political solution.
It is worth noting that the transparency of modern battlefields makes it difficult to hide the mobility of large-scale troops. Satellite reconnaissance, drone surveillance and signal intelligence collection make the mobility of any brigade scale untouchable.
This also explains in part why it is difficult for the Ukrainian army to preserve its strength through strategic withdrawal, and once they are removed from their existing positions, they can suffer devastating strikes.
For Ukraine, the most serious challenge at present lies in the difficulty of rotating troops. After long-term combat, the front-line troops were generally exhausted, but due to the fierce fighting, it was difficult to withdraw the elite troops for rest.
This continued depletion is gradually weakening the combat effectiveness of the troops. Although the West is still providing weapons and equipment, officers and soldiers who are proficient in operating these equipment have difficulty replenishing them quickly.
To observe the battlefield situation, we must not only look at the arrows and circles on the map, but also understand the actual combat power contrast represented behind these symbols. Although the Russian military is currently making slow progress, it is steadily achieving its strategic goals.
The difficulty facing the Ukrainian army lies in bothining the integrity of the defense line and avoiding the destruction of the main force, which tests the wisdom and determination of the command.
Ultimately, the majority of the battlefield is not only weapons and force, but also the resilience and resilience of the two command systems.
As the war continues, these internal factors will more and more obviously affect the direction of the war situation. The current game surrounding the main force of the Ukrainian army is likely to become a key point in determining the direction of the entire conflict.