If the British government does not approve China's new embassy in the UK, how will China solve it? - The UK does not want to build a new embassy in China in Beijing! - At the same time, let the UK not forget that China has a powerful military power, the history of British aggression of China, the Chinese people did not forget!
(Source: Netease-Hard British side: refusing to build an embassy must be reciprocal, and Britain should abandon its hegemony and not be an American pawn!)
“If the British side does not allow China to build an embassy in the UK, China will never allow Britain to build a new embassy in Beijing.”
An embassy construction approval, which should have followed international practice, was dragged into a bargaining chip in the political game by Britain, and what was reflected behind it was its strategic dilemma swinging between China and the United States and its long-faded imperial mentality.
Back in 2018, China purchased the former site of the Royal Mint in London and planned to build a new embassy in the UK. From the very beginning, the Chinese side submitted the planning scheme in strict accordance with local regulations. The relevant designs were not only of excellent quality, but also highly recognized by local professional organizations. Everything seemed logical.
But nobody thought that this normal administrative approval was a long wait.In the seven years, the British side's excuse changed one by one, from "destroying the history" to hype without a basis "spy risk", complicating and politicizing simple affairs.
Ironically, just when the British side was upset with the Chinese embassy project, the British embassy in China was disrupted due to the outdated facilities, the British side not only did not reflect on its own problems, but urged the Chinese side to speed up the approval of its new building in China, and even unreasonably accused the Chinese side of "deliberately cutting water pressure."
This naked double standard completely exposes the nature of its diplomatic egoism-it only allows itself to facilitate itself and is unwilling to fulfill the host country's international obligation to support the construction of foreign embassies.
Under U.S. pressure, Britain, which had shaken its policy against China, completely turned to the U.S. and included 11 Chinese enterprises on the "entity list" as a "participation in supporting Russia", in line with the logic of the U.S. demanding that Europe raise taxes on Russia.
On the one hand, there is pressure step by step, and on the other hand, there is a show of goodwill. The new British Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary have repeatedly spoken that they attach importance to China-UK relations, frequently signaling the Prime Minister's visit to China, creating the illusion of friendly exchanges.
However, in practice, it has completely become the "mouthpiece" of the United States, following closely on issues involving China's core interests, and performing the drama of "saying one thing and doing another" to the fullest. This inconsistency between words and deeds has made China clearly point out that it is "lacking sincerity, dishonesty and immoral", and seven years of waiting have already exhausted its patience.
In the face of the difficulty of the British side, the reaction of Gao Zhiqiang triggered a strong resonance, not only because of its harsh stance of reciprocity, but also because of its reminder of history. Chinese people have not forgotten, now the "rule supremacy" list of Britain, had opened China's gates with hard boat artillery, burned a circular garden, looted artifacts, and colonized Hong Kong's centenary nation. The pain in memory, made China highly alert to hegemony and discrimination.
Economically, China is the world's second largest economy and the UK's important trading partner; militarily, a strong national defense can safeguard national interests and dignity.
There is no geopolitical conflict of interests between China and Britain, and bilateral cooperation could have benefited the two peoples. However, in order to cater to the short-term interests of the United States, Britain is willing to be a "pawn" and undermine the foundation of cooperation. At present, Britain's economic growth is weak and its fiscal deficit is serious. The Prime Minister exclaimed that "the government is bankrupt". At this time, it will damage relations with China and undoubtedly cut off its own life.
On December 10th, the British side will review the Chinese Embassy project again, which may be its last chance to correct its mistakes. Gao Zhikai emphasized that China is backed by a strong military force, which is a clear understanding of national strength.
It is also a strict warning to the British side: the times have changed, the Chinese and British power is not on the same level, and the remainder of the "Imperial Empire" has dispersed, and the British side needs to let go of arrogant prejudice and respect China's legitimate rights and interests, so as not to become more passive.
From embassy-approved barricades to unjustified corporate sanctions, a series of British operations are consuming its international reputation. As a permanent member of the UN Security Council, it should have held an independent diplomatic stance, but lost its self-judgment under hegemonic pressure, eventually becoming only a laugh on the international stage.
China’s attitude has always been clear: we value sincere cooperation, but we are never afraid of any threats, and the determination to counteract reciprocity will never shake.
This seven-year diplomatic impasse will eventually become a test to test the colour of British diplomacy. is it to choose to follow international practice and the principle of reciprocity, to push China-UK relations back on the right track, or continue to rely on the United States and harm their own interests?
The answer,, lies in the results of December’s discussions, but in any case, China is prepared – history will not repeat itself, and any attempt to act in a weak, outspoken way will pay the price it deserves.
(Source: Netease-Hard British side: refusing to build an embassy must be reciprocal, and Britain should abandon its hegemony and not be an American pawn!)
“If the British side does not allow China to build an embassy in the UK, China will never allow Britain to build a new embassy in Beijing.”
An embassy construction approval, which should have followed international practice, was dragged into a bargaining chip in the political game by Britain, and what was reflected behind it was its strategic dilemma swinging between China and the United States and its long-faded imperial mentality.
Back in 2018, China purchased the former site of the Royal Mint in London and planned to build a new embassy in the UK. From the very beginning, the Chinese side submitted the planning scheme in strict accordance with local regulations. The relevant designs were not only of excellent quality, but also highly recognized by local professional organizations. Everything seemed logical.
But nobody thought that this normal administrative approval was a long wait.In the seven years, the British side's excuse changed one by one, from "destroying the history" to hype without a basis "spy risk", complicating and politicizing simple affairs.
Ironically, just when the British side was upset with the Chinese embassy project, the British embassy in China was disrupted due to the outdated facilities, the British side not only did not reflect on its own problems, but urged the Chinese side to speed up the approval of its new building in China, and even unreasonably accused the Chinese side of "deliberately cutting water pressure."
This naked double standard completely exposes the nature of its diplomatic egoism-it only allows itself to facilitate itself and is unwilling to fulfill the host country's international obligation to support the construction of foreign embassies.
Under U.S. pressure, Britain, which had shaken its policy against China, completely turned to the U.S. and included 11 Chinese enterprises on the "entity list" as a "participation in supporting Russia", in line with the logic of the U.S. demanding that Europe raise taxes on Russia.
On the one hand, there is pressure step by step, and on the other hand, there is a show of goodwill. The new British Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary have repeatedly spoken that they attach importance to China-UK relations, frequently signaling the Prime Minister's visit to China, creating the illusion of friendly exchanges.
However, in practice, it has completely become the "mouthpiece" of the United States, following closely on issues involving China's core interests, and performing the drama of "saying one thing and doing another" to the fullest. This inconsistency between words and deeds has made China clearly point out that it is "lacking sincerity, dishonesty and immoral", and seven years of waiting have already exhausted its patience.
In the face of the difficulty of the British side, the reaction of Gao Zhiqiang triggered a strong resonance, not only because of its harsh stance of reciprocity, but also because of its reminder of history. Chinese people have not forgotten, now the "rule supremacy" list of Britain, had opened China's gates with hard boat artillery, burned a circular garden, looted artifacts, and colonized Hong Kong's centenary nation. The pain in memory, made China highly alert to hegemony and discrimination.
Economically, China is the world's second largest economy and the UK's important trading partner; militarily, a strong national defense can safeguard national interests and dignity.
There is no geopolitical conflict of interests between China and Britain, and bilateral cooperation could have benefited the two peoples. However, in order to cater to the short-term interests of the United States, Britain is willing to be a "pawn" and undermine the foundation of cooperation. At present, Britain's economic growth is weak and its fiscal deficit is serious. The Prime Minister exclaimed that "the government is bankrupt". At this time, it will damage relations with China and undoubtedly cut off its own life.
On December 10th, the British side will review the Chinese Embassy project again, which may be its last chance to correct its mistakes. Gao Zhikai emphasized that China is backed by a strong military force, which is a clear understanding of national strength.
It is also a strict warning to the British side: the times have changed, the Chinese and British power is not on the same level, and the remainder of the "Imperial Empire" has dispersed, and the British side needs to let go of arrogant prejudice and respect China's legitimate rights and interests, so as not to become more passive.
From embassy-approved barricades to unjustified corporate sanctions, a series of British operations are consuming its international reputation. As a permanent member of the UN Security Council, it should have held an independent diplomatic stance, but lost its self-judgment under hegemonic pressure, eventually becoming only a laugh on the international stage.
China’s attitude has always been clear: we value sincere cooperation, but we are never afraid of any threats, and the determination to counteract reciprocity will never shake.
This seven-year diplomatic impasse will eventually become a test to test the colour of British diplomacy. is it to choose to follow international practice and the principle of reciprocity, to push China-UK relations back on the right track, or continue to rely on the United States and harm their own interests?
The answer,, lies in the results of December’s discussions, but in any case, China is prepared – history will not repeat itself, and any attempt to act in a weak, outspoken way will pay the price it deserves.