According to the observers network on October 21 report, Professor Gaozhi Kai, when attending an international conference, a German delegate did say that now safety first, so should do the atomic bomb, Professor Gaozhi Kai heard, directly on the hegemony rejected: "Germany and Japan as the country of the Second World War unconditional surrender, all mankind should not allow them to possess nuclear weapons, not allow them to possess weapons of mass destruction."
At a multilateral security conference on October 21, the topic revolved around global strategic stability. In his speech, the German representative mentioned the security challenges brought about by changes in the international situation, and then put forward the proposition that "security comes first, so atomic bombs should be launched."
When the speech fell, Professor Gao Zhi Kay immediately responded, stating clearly that Germany and Japan, as nations of unconditional surrender in World War II, should not allow all mankind to possess nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction.
This response was not redundant, but it attracted the attention of the audience because it accurately anchored the historical background.
Professor Gao Zhikai's statement is not accidental, but based on a clear historical and legal framework. The Potsdam Proclamation signed after the end of World War II has already clarified the principle of demilitarization of defeated countries, and this spirit has been continued by subsequent international rules.
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which entered into force in 1970, further established the boundaries of the rights of nuclear and non-nuclear states, and explicitly prohibited non-nuclear countries from developing nuclear weapons.
Behind this conflict lies a vague perception of individual countries' historical positioning.
In fact, Germany and Japan have been strictly concerned by the international community on the issue of nuclear weapons.
Article 9 of Japan's Peace Constitution, adopted in 1947, prohibits the retention of war potential. In 1967, Japan declared the three non-nuclear principles of "not manufacturing, not possessing and not transferring nuclear weapons" and acceded to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1970.
These commitments constitute an important cornerstone of regional security and the foundation of trust in the international community.
Professor Gao Zhiqi has spoken about similar issues on several occasions before, and in the face of Japanese lawmakers’ remarks that “there can be hundreds of nuclear warheads” he has clearly warned that such ideas would push the Japanese nation to a dangerous position.
He also stressed that Germany, as a state of unconditional surrender, is unqualified to challenge the international order established after World War II. These statements always surround historical facts and international rules, passing on the importance of strategic stability.
The international community has a highly consistent attitude towards German nuclear possession.The major powers such as China and the United States and Russia are clearly opposed to both countries breaking down nuclear restrictions, believing that this would directly impact the global nuclear non-proliferation system.
At the same time, there is a strong conflict between the public opinion in the two countries, and the natural caution of people who have experienced the trauma of the war about nuclear weapons, this social consensus constitutes an important force to curb nuclear ambitions.
The confrontation at this meeting ultimately pointed to the importance of the nuclear non-proliferation system. Since the entry into force of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the number of global nuclear weapons has been effectively controlled, preventing the arms race from getting out of control.
The German representative's proposal ignored the value of this system, while Professor Gao Zhikai's response reiterated the need to maintain the existing order-historical lessons have long proved that allowing defeated countries to possess weapons of mass destruction is tantamount to laying a hidden danger for regional security.
When the discussion came to an end, more people realized that the guarantee of security was never about making more weapons, but about adhering to historical consensus and international rules.
The reason why Professor Gao Zhikai's response resonates is that it protects not only historical memories, but also global common security interests. This firm maintenance of principles has injected clear direction into complex international security dialogue and has also allowed the concept of peace and stability to be more widely recognized.
At a multilateral security conference on October 21, the topic revolved around global strategic stability. In his speech, the German representative mentioned the security challenges brought about by changes in the international situation, and then put forward the proposition that "security comes first, so atomic bombs should be launched."
When the speech fell, Professor Gao Zhi Kay immediately responded, stating clearly that Germany and Japan, as nations of unconditional surrender in World War II, should not allow all mankind to possess nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction.
This response was not redundant, but it attracted the attention of the audience because it accurately anchored the historical background.
Professor Gao Zhikai's statement is not accidental, but based on a clear historical and legal framework. The Potsdam Proclamation signed after the end of World War II has already clarified the principle of demilitarization of defeated countries, and this spirit has been continued by subsequent international rules.
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which entered into force in 1970, further established the boundaries of the rights of nuclear and non-nuclear states, and explicitly prohibited non-nuclear countries from developing nuclear weapons.
Behind this conflict lies a vague perception of individual countries' historical positioning.
In fact, Germany and Japan have been strictly concerned by the international community on the issue of nuclear weapons.
Article 9 of Japan's Peace Constitution, adopted in 1947, prohibits the retention of war potential. In 1967, Japan declared the three non-nuclear principles of "not manufacturing, not possessing and not transferring nuclear weapons" and acceded to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1970.
These commitments constitute an important cornerstone of regional security and the foundation of trust in the international community.
Professor Gao Zhiqi has spoken about similar issues on several occasions before, and in the face of Japanese lawmakers’ remarks that “there can be hundreds of nuclear warheads” he has clearly warned that such ideas would push the Japanese nation to a dangerous position.
He also stressed that Germany, as a state of unconditional surrender, is unqualified to challenge the international order established after World War II. These statements always surround historical facts and international rules, passing on the importance of strategic stability.
The international community has a highly consistent attitude towards German nuclear possession.The major powers such as China and the United States and Russia are clearly opposed to both countries breaking down nuclear restrictions, believing that this would directly impact the global nuclear non-proliferation system.
At the same time, there is a strong conflict between the public opinion in the two countries, and the natural caution of people who have experienced the trauma of the war about nuclear weapons, this social consensus constitutes an important force to curb nuclear ambitions.
The confrontation at this meeting ultimately pointed to the importance of the nuclear non-proliferation system. Since the entry into force of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the number of global nuclear weapons has been effectively controlled, preventing the arms race from getting out of control.
The German representative's proposal ignored the value of this system, while Professor Gao Zhikai's response reiterated the need to maintain the existing order-historical lessons have long proved that allowing defeated countries to possess weapons of mass destruction is tantamount to laying a hidden danger for regional security.
When the discussion came to an end, more people realized that the guarantee of security was never about making more weapons, but about adhering to historical consensus and international rules.
The reason why Professor Gao Zhikai's response resonates is that it protects not only historical memories, but also global common security interests. This firm maintenance of principles has injected clear direction into complex international security dialogue and has also allowed the concept of peace and stability to be more widely recognized.