When I woke up, Holland called.

Definitely a semiconductor incident.

Looking at the announcement of the Ministry of Commerce, sure enough-on October 21, Minister of Commerce Wang Wentao " AgreedIn a conversation with Dutch Economy Minister Karemans, the two sides exchanged views on issues such as Anselm Semiconductor.

Please note: to be agreed.

What is China¡¯s position?

The press release of the Ministry of Commerce contains three words.

In the first sentence, Wang said that China attaches great importance to China's economic and trade cooperation.

The implication is that your actions in the Netherlands really shouldn't be. I'm sorry for our respect for you.

Second, ¡°The relevant measures taken by the Netherlands against Anselm Semiconductors have seriously affected the stability of the global supply chain.¡±

This is direct criticism, and the consequences are serious.

The third sentence, "China urges the Netherlands to proceed from the overall situation of maintaining the security and stability of the global production and supply chain, uphold the spirit of contract and the principles of marketization and rule of law, properly solve problems as soon as possible, protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese investors, and create a fair, transparent and predictable business environment."

To propose a solution to the path, the bell will also need to be called, and the Netherlands you will need to take action to correct.

What is the attitude of the Netherlands?

In a press release from the Ministry of Commerce, Karemans stated that the Netherlands attaches great importance to the economic and trade relations between the Netherlands and China and is willing to communicate closely with China to find constructive solutions to the Nexperia issue.

I took a look, and Karemans also made a special statement, saying, "This afternoon (late at night Beijing time), I had a conversation with His Excellency Wang Wentao, Minister of Commerce of China. We discussed further measures to reach a solution that is in line with the interests of Nexperia, the European economy and China's economy. In the future, we will continue to keep in touch with the Chinese authorities and work together to reach a constructive solution."

Previously, Karemans also gave an interview to defend the Dutch move, to the effect that China was wrong, and the Netherlands really didn't join hands with the United States to deal with Chinese enterprises. The Netherlands did so for fear of transferring Anshi's business and intellectual property rights out of Europe.

Do the Dutch believe, do the Chinese believe?

No matter what the excuse, the forced takeover of Chinese enterprise subsidiaries is a public robbery.

In any case, in the overseas social media, the Netherlands is blamed.Many people criticize that the mentality of the Netherlands is really a problem, it is stupid to initiate to the United States, and finally to be countered by China.

But problems must be solved.

The Netherlands had to bow its head and turn to China to discuss it. Otherwise, even if Anshi is in the hands of the Netherlands, it will really be destroyed by the Netherlands. More importantly, the Netherlands will lose its morality and credibility.

But no matter how we discuss it, such an open robbery is definitely unacceptable to China.

For example, if China forcibly takes over Dutch companies in this way, will the Dutch people happily accept it?

Or Minister Wang Wentao's third sentence, look at the actions of the Dutch.

The spirit of contract, where is your spirit of contract? The principles of marketization and legalization, this is your marketization and legalization?

The actions of the Netherlands are really surprising. Unexpectedly, the Netherlands, with thick eyebrows and big eyes, did not follow the rules in this way, which exposed the hypocrisy of some Westerners.

In this case, it is impolite to come and not go. There is no counter-measure. Some people do not know the height of heaven and earth and do not know the minimum respect.

Oh well, In this world, ignorance is not the obstacle to survival, arrogance is.