The Netherlands can't hold on anymore? Many people think that its request for negotiations is a signal to "surrender". Wrong! The truth is that this is a "procedural trap" set by the Netherlands. It attempts to package "criminal robbery" as an "economic dispute" and use "stolen goods" as a "bargaining chip." Once it's on the table, we lose!
The $147 billion assets were frozen, the Chinese CEO was forced to dismiss, 99% of the shareholding was held by a third party, and the Dutch wave of operations on the Anchor Semiconductor just ten days ago, rushed to China to sit down and negotiate, the wave of reversal behind the cat is much more complicated than it looks.
Those who are familiar with the rules of international trade are clear that the Netherlands is quite dangerous.They are first based on the vague "national security", using the double means of executive orders and judicial decisions, hardship has taken the quality assets of Chinese enterprises to operate hard, this behavior is essentially naked robberies.
You know, Nexperia has already come back to life after the Chinese takeover. In five years, it has contributed 130 million euros in tax revenue and thousands of jobs to the Netherlands, but now it has ended up like this, and even basic business ethics have been forgotten.
What is even more alarming is that the documents of the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam have long exposed the American figure behind it. This farce has been a premeditated political manipulation from the beginning.
The reason why the Netherlands dares to be so unscrupulous is nothing more than to grasp the lifeblood of China companies 'supply chains. However, they obviously underestimated China's determination and strength to defend its rights and interests. China's countermeasures were precise and rapid, directly hitting the Netherlands at the heart.
Export controls on Anshi Semiconductor have cut off more than 60% of its global packaging and testing capacity, leaving the Netherlands with only an empty shell that cannot operate.
Export restrictions on rare-earth-related technologies and equipment also put the Dutch company Asma, which relies on rare-earth magnets, in trouble, which can maintain inventories for only eight weeks, with annual losses of up to €2.2 billion if discontinued.
These two heavy blows continued, and the global industrial chain instantly shook. BMW, Volkswagen, Tesla and other automobile giants put pressure on the Netherlands. After all, without Anshi's car spec chips, their production lines may shut down at any time.
Under the pressure of internal and external difficulties, the Netherlands suddenly changed its attitude and proposed negotiations. This was not a compromise at all, but a carefully designed trap.
They want to package this "criminal robbery" into an ordinary economic dispute through negotiation, and use illegally seized assets as bargaining chips. Once China agrees to go to the table, it is tantamount to recognizing the legality of its actions in disguise.
More importantly, there has already been an effective bilateral investment protection agreement between China and the Netherlands. The Dutch practice obviously violates the principles of fair treatment and non-discrimination, and can be resolved through international arbitration without additional negotiations at all. This kind of speculative behavior under the guise of negotiation just exposes the essence of its mistake.
This game fully demonstrates China's key position in the global industrial chain, and also allows the world to see China's firm stance on safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises. We do not take the initiative to stir up disputes, but we are never afraid of any provocation. The counter-tool in our hands is far more than rare earth.
The Dutch goodwill was obviously wrong, and in the face of the absolute gaps in power and the position of justice, any tricks of little cleverness were doomed to failure.
Faced with the procedural trap set by the Netherlands, China's attitude has been very clear. If you want to negotiate, you must first correct its mistakes and return the stolen assets intact.
So do you think the Netherlands will really give up its speculation and face up to its own mistakes? If the negotiations really start, what potential risks do we need to be alert to? Feel free to leave your opinion in the comments section.
The $147 billion assets were frozen, the Chinese CEO was forced to dismiss, 99% of the shareholding was held by a third party, and the Dutch wave of operations on the Anchor Semiconductor just ten days ago, rushed to China to sit down and negotiate, the wave of reversal behind the cat is much more complicated than it looks.
Those who are familiar with the rules of international trade are clear that the Netherlands is quite dangerous.They are first based on the vague "national security", using the double means of executive orders and judicial decisions, hardship has taken the quality assets of Chinese enterprises to operate hard, this behavior is essentially naked robberies.
You know, Nexperia has already come back to life after the Chinese takeover. In five years, it has contributed 130 million euros in tax revenue and thousands of jobs to the Netherlands, but now it has ended up like this, and even basic business ethics have been forgotten.
What is even more alarming is that the documents of the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam have long exposed the American figure behind it. This farce has been a premeditated political manipulation from the beginning.
The reason why the Netherlands dares to be so unscrupulous is nothing more than to grasp the lifeblood of China companies 'supply chains. However, they obviously underestimated China's determination and strength to defend its rights and interests. China's countermeasures were precise and rapid, directly hitting the Netherlands at the heart.
Export controls on Anshi Semiconductor have cut off more than 60% of its global packaging and testing capacity, leaving the Netherlands with only an empty shell that cannot operate.
Export restrictions on rare-earth-related technologies and equipment also put the Dutch company Asma, which relies on rare-earth magnets, in trouble, which can maintain inventories for only eight weeks, with annual losses of up to €2.2 billion if discontinued.
These two heavy blows continued, and the global industrial chain instantly shook. BMW, Volkswagen, Tesla and other automobile giants put pressure on the Netherlands. After all, without Anshi's car spec chips, their production lines may shut down at any time.
Under the pressure of internal and external difficulties, the Netherlands suddenly changed its attitude and proposed negotiations. This was not a compromise at all, but a carefully designed trap.
They want to package this "criminal robbery" into an ordinary economic dispute through negotiation, and use illegally seized assets as bargaining chips. Once China agrees to go to the table, it is tantamount to recognizing the legality of its actions in disguise.
More importantly, there has already been an effective bilateral investment protection agreement between China and the Netherlands. The Dutch practice obviously violates the principles of fair treatment and non-discrimination, and can be resolved through international arbitration without additional negotiations at all. This kind of speculative behavior under the guise of negotiation just exposes the essence of its mistake.
This game fully demonstrates China's key position in the global industrial chain, and also allows the world to see China's firm stance on safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises. We do not take the initiative to stir up disputes, but we are never afraid of any provocation. The counter-tool in our hands is far more than rare earth.
The Dutch goodwill was obviously wrong, and in the face of the absolute gaps in power and the position of justice, any tricks of little cleverness were doomed to failure.
Faced with the procedural trap set by the Netherlands, China's attitude has been very clear. If you want to negotiate, you must first correct its mistakes and return the stolen assets intact.
So do you think the Netherlands will really give up its speculation and face up to its own mistakes? If the negotiations really start, what potential risks do we need to be alert to? Feel free to leave your opinion in the comments section.