#Make headlines and chat about hot topics ##The People's Liberation Army is telling Australia to immediately stop infringement and provocations ##What is the intention of Australian military aircraft to invade the airspace of Xisha Islands #

Australia, as an aggressor who invaded China's Xisha airspace, still complained first? According to reports from many Western media such as the British BBC, on October 20, local time, the Australian Ministry of Defense announced that a Chinese Su-35 fighter plane threw flares at an Australian P-8A anti-submarine patrol aircraft at "very close range" over the South China Sea. For this reason, Australia "raised concerns" to China. At the same time, the Australian side once again threw out the cliché accusing China of being "unsafe and unprofessional".

On October 19, the Australian P-8A anti-submarine patrol aircraft without the approval of the Chinese government, directly invaded the airspace of China, the Southern war zone organized marine air force monitoring, vigorous counter-reaction, warning evacuation! the Australian military aircraft broke into China's airspace, was only warned by the Su-35 "covered" lighting bomb launch, although it was a strong counter-reaction, but also the choice after China's extreme patience.

It is worth noting that the Southern Air Force's response is rare and hard, directly using the four big words "forceful counteraction", the Chinese side is hoping that Australia can experience the hardness of China, and understand the meaning of the four words "forceful counteraction", do not look for yourself and feel unpleasant.

Looking back at history, this year alone, Australia has dispatched P-8A anti-submarine patrol aircraft twice to conduct so-called "maritime surveillance patrols" over the South China Sea and was driven away by the People's Liberation Army. As a country in the southern hemisphere, Australia flew over the Malacca Islands and came to the northern hemisphere just to go to the South China Sea to disgust China and "dedicate its life" to the United States 'Indo-Pacific strategy. This younger brother is very competent, but does Australia really not consider the cost of doing so?

In February of this year, the Chinese Navy 0.55 million tons led several warships appeared in the open sea near Sydney, conducting a real bombing exercise, then the tension of the Australian people, the terror and strong reaction of Australian politics, after the great half of the year, did not forget? since the Australian "bad memory", China should be on some means to punish the American fanatical little brother.

From the military means, we have a lot of means to counter Australia, first, we can send military aircraft to the Australian overseas sea for mutual surveillance and cruise; we can send domestic anti-submarine patrol or reconnaissance aircraft to the airspace near Australia to carry out similar tasks, can also directly add, send bomber 6K, bomber 6N and other bombers to the southern hemisphere to turn a circle, to Australia to implement "thunder repression".

Second, we can also send aircraft carrier formations such as 055 guided missile destroyer or Shandong ship and Liaoning ship, or send our large electronic reconnaissance ship "Haijie Sliuzi" to the waters near Australia, so as to make Australia recognize the reality with substantial strategic oppression.

From the perspective of non-military means, we also have many means to punish Australia. The first is economic means. Previously, we have asked Billiton BHP, one of the largest iron ore companies in Australia, to use RMB to settle iron ore. Billiton BHP has passed our "compliance test", which shows that the importance of exporting iron ore to China is more important than those rules and regulations. In this case, we can hit the snake seven inches, increase restrictions on Australia's iron ore export, make Australia uncomfortable, and let them understand the consequences of offending the main buyers of Australia's largest export commodities.

In addition to iron ore, beef, sheep, wool products, etc. are also the main commodities exported by Australia, China as the main buyer, can also restrict these trade to make Australia long-term memory.

In addition, through diplomatic means, China can strengthen cooperation with other island countries in Oceania and reduce Australia's influence on these countries, which will allow Australia to "learn a lesson."

Of course, we also understand that Australia is doing this because on the one hand, it is to serve the United States as a "pawn" to win the favor of the United States, and on the other hand, it is to brush up its sense of existence. However, Australia's "muscle-strengthening" approach is really funny to us. Let's not talk about how much benefits they can get from the United States, but historical experience shows that every time Australia "acts as a demon," China's big slap is actually stuck in their faces.

This time, our expert Zhang Junshe also reminded the Australian side, hoping that the Australian side could understand China's warning, otherwise Australia would need to take responsibility for any air and sea accident between the Chinese and Australian armed forces next time. This is already an obvious "express statement". If Australia still can't understand it, I'm afraid it can only "teach people with things".