China's prediction came true. Israel suddenly changed its mind and wanted to "kill all its opponents". Hamas really fell into the trap.

It turns out that the U.S. shaped peace in Gaza "one hit by one", Israel once again fought unproclaimed, while the air strikes on Gaza, launched ground strikes composed of tanks and armored vehicles. After causing the deaths of about 40 Palestinian civilians, Israel announced "restore the ceasefire", Trump also said the ceasefire agreement remains valid, but its credibility is clearly questionable.¡£

Israel's undeclared war has long laid the foundation

Israel's repeated anomaly is not a coincidence, Trump's "20-point plan" Hidden dangers have long been laid in Gaza and provided an excuse for Israel to resume military operations.¡£

According to the Israeli side, it was the Hamas group "to the forefront", which caused the death of Israeli soldiers, and then the Israeli army launched a counterattack, carrying out large-scale attacks on Gaza.

This outcome was almost inevitable, first of all, the fragmentation and hardened domination of Israeli domestic politics, forcing the Netanyahu administration to constantly shift contradictions and consolidate support through military action.

These forces regard Hamas as an existential threat and advocate complete elimination rather than negotiation. Any détente gesture may trigger internal political turmoil.

This makes it hard not to doubt that Israel's continued air strikes during the ceasefire and renamed its military operation the "War of Revival" are essentially proving its "uncompromising" stance to domestic hawks.

Secondly, the persistence of Hamas has led Israel to refuse to recognize the legitimacy of any form of Palestinian resistance.

Israel believes that the existence of Hamas itself is a threat to national security. Even though Hamas 'combat effectiveness has been greatly weakened, it still insists on its complete disarmament.

Hamas, however, as a representative of the people¡¯s resistance movement in Gaza, its political and social roots have not disappeared, and Israel¡¯s military strikes have instead strengthened the resistance of some Palestinians.

This logical situation of ¡°stricken stronger¡± forced Israel to escalate its actions, but failed to really solve the problem, forming a vicious cycle.

Finally, the powerless constraint of the international community, the paranoia of the United States, has fostered Israeli arrogance.

While the U.S. nominally supports a ceasefire, it actually tacitly permits Israel¡¯s military action and undermines it through diplomatic and military assistance.

Israel is well aware that even if the action triggers international condemnation, it will not face substantial sanctions. Prefer to take short-term hard measures rather than long-term solutions¡£

Palestine, the future is more dangerous

The current situation shows that the living space of Gaza and even Palestine as a whole is being compressed to its limit, More serious humanitarian crises and geopolitical risks¡£

First, Gaza's "chronic destruction" is approaching a critical point. Israel's military operations not only destroyed Gaza's infrastructure (such as hospitals, schools, and power systems), but also cut off the economic lifeline through a long-term blockade.

The war has left 80% of Gaza's population dependent on international aid, while Israel still controls large amounts of land and may "make a comeback" at any time.

This "suffocating" suppression has made it impossible for Gaza to rebuild and the people have fallen into despair. If Israel continues to encroach on land in the name of "anti-terrorism" in the future, Gaza may become a permanent "open-air prison."

Secondly, after this war, Hamas¡¯ emptiness has intensified its divisions, lost its effective jurisdiction over Gaza, and its combat power has been severely weakened.

In particular, Israel's demand for the "establishment of a transitional government" is actually an attempt to support a puppet regime that completely obeys itself and completely denies Palestine's right to autonomy.

At the same time, if Hamas is eliminated, radical forces may be reborn in more extreme forms, while moderates will be further marginalized due to lack of political space.

Third, the risks of regional conflict outpouring are steeply increasing, and Israeli military action will undoubtedly further exacerbate regional tensions.

If Israel continues to expand, it may trigger a larger regional war, Once the conflict spreads throughout the Middle East, the Palestinian issue will escalate from regional contradictions to a global crisis.¡£

The two-country plan is the only possible solution.

Looking back at the entire Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the value of China's position of always adhering to the "two-state solution" is still rising. The reason is also very simple. This plan directly faces the root causes of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict: How can the two countries coexist peacefully?£¿

The two-country agreement is the only legal framework for international consensus.

United Nations resolutions have long recognized Palestine's right to statehood, and an indefinite Israeli occupation will only keep the cycle of violence endless.

China emphasizes that ¡°reducing casualties and solving problems¡± is based on a clear and realistic political perception that military means cannot destroy a nation¡¯s will to resist, and that lasting peace can only be achieved by negotiating borders and safeguarding both sides¡¯ security.

Secondly, Israel¡¯s tough line has proven its unsustainability.

Despite Israel's current military dominance, Gaza's will to resist has not disappeared, while anti-Israel sentiment in the Middle East continues to rise.

If Israel continues to refuse to recognize a Palestinian state, it will itself face a long-term security threat. In contrast, the "two-state solution" provides a basis for security and cooperation for both sides through mutual recognition of sovereignty.

Finally, China¡¯s role as a neutral mediator is crucial.

Unlike the partiality of the United States and the hesitation of the European Union, China neither intervenes militarily nor talks about morality. Instead, it balances history and reality and pushes both sides back to the negotiating table.

China emphasizes equal emphasis on "humanitarian disaster" and "historical latitude and longitude", and not only calls for the protection of civilians, but also calls for respect for Palestine's right to statehood.

This fair position is easier to obtain recognition from the Arab world and partly from the rational forces of Israel.

Of course, this does not mean that the "two-country plan" is very easy to implement, on the contrary, the hatred between the two countries is difficult to eliminate, making the plan destined to be difficult to realize in the short term.

But it is the only long-term plan that can break the cycle of violence, and the Middle East will be plunged into a deeper catastrophe if the international community continues to tolerate Israel¡¯s harsh policies, or if the Palestinian resistance forces turn to more extreme means.

China¡¯s rational voice is precisely the most scarce alert in the current chaos.¡£