The "wild child" incident, which has boiled online in the past few days, added key details, according to the investigation of journalists, found that the little boy is not the only child, and there is a younger child in the family.
Previously, the whole network had only seen pictures of a 3-year-old brother crawling naked, and with the exposure of another child, more truth gradually emerged.
Unknown bone ornaments were hung on the RV. The mother explained why the child was not wearing clothes, but she was attacked by netizens again.
From “goken parents” to “refusing to intervene”, from “car travel” to “leave yourself to climb the table”, what is the secret behind this family?
More than one child, family background hides details
The incident happened on October 15. A netizen saw a naked little boy on a highway in Sichuan. He seemed to be only about 3 years old.
The key was that the little boy did not feel any shame or discomfort at all, but instead ran on the ground at will, and the movement looked like a wild man.
Netizens who discovered this scene immediately called the police, and soon the police contacted the little boy's parents. What was shocking was that they both graduated from college, and the reason why they did this was for the education of their children.
The little boy's parents claimed that their family adopted the educational philosophy of returning to nature, was a normal family, and there was no abuse.
Just when everyone was only concerned about the little boy, in fact, there was one child in this special family, from the video, the other child seems not to walk yet, and still needs to be supported by the father's shoulder to climb the stairs.
More importantly, the other child was fully dressed, the child was dressed in a simple cotton coat, but on the other hand the three-year-old boy was still naked, climbing on the ground with his hands and feet and using the ground.
What is even more surprising is that the family is not unable to buy clothes, it is a strange way of raising children, most of the time they are traveling by car to many places, and it looks like they are deliberately living a pastoral life.
The interior of the car: the contradiction between toys and bone jewelry
With more netizens exposing car pictures, the family's "two-sidedness" is becoming increasingly obvious, both preparing toys for children, but hanging weird jewelry.
Some netizens revealed that the interior of a small boy's car is not clean, but can see obvious traces of children's life, the corner is stacked with a basket of children's toys, not like completely regardless of the child's appearance.
Visitors who met at the restaurant also confirmed that the little boy's mother would use chopsticks to feed him and feed him in the mouth, but it was relentless that the little boy would climb directly to the table when he ate.
The most disturbing of netizens is a series of bone jewelry hanging on the back of the car driver's seat, which is hanged in the child's reachable position.
This series of bones also sparked netizens speculation, is it used for evil? or there are other special meanings? but hanging in the car with two children, always feel inappropriate.
Mother reveals the reason why she doesn't dress
Regarding the reason that the little boy does not wear for a long time, the mother explained that the little boy from a young age has rashes, it is itching once he wears his clothes, he will take off, and slowly get used to not wearing.
However, this explanation was quickly overturned by the villagers' revelations. Some villagers said that they saw the little boy's father directly pull the child under the faucet to flush cold water, and before they saw the little boy naked and basking in the sun with the dog in winter.
Per the pressure of the public opinion, the mother of the young boys promised to place the children in Beijing, but whether they can be implemented, it is still necessary to see if they meet the local settlement conditions, at the moment there is no official information to confirm.
The truth of the "wild children" incidents is becoming increasingly clear, and it is not the helplessness caused by poverty, but the parents' deliberately chosen ways of raising children, rejecting all reasonable interventions in the name of "natural education".
The attention and persuasion of netizens may temporarily allow the child to wear clothes, but more strength is needed to really get him back to normal life.
The growth of a three-year-old child should not rely only on the “good will of the passers”, but rather on institutional safeguards to avoid losing his normal childhood in the name of special education.