Many U.S. media call on China: once the war is inevitable, call on China not to strike U.S. soldiers, not to attack U.S. mainland.
Recently, several U.S. media outlets have thrown an absurd and extreme appeal: If the Chinese-U.S. war is unfortunate, demand that China do not strike U.S. troops or attack U.S. mainland.
These remarks vividly demonstrated the double standards of hegemonism, completely ignoring the military deterrence that the United States has been pressing against China for many years. It seems that as long as the knife is put between others 'necks, the other party will not only be unable to resist, but will also promise not to hurt them when counterattack.
This argument, which violates military common sense and fairness norms, is actually a naked exposure of the United States 'hegemonic thinking. To expose its absurd nature, we must first clarify how the United States has stepped its military iron foot step by step at the doorstep of China in recent years.
In the global military layout, the United States sees the Asia-Pacific region as a strategic core, woven through layers of missile defense systems and missile bases, weaving a military siege network around China.
The most provocative thing is the "AUKUS" trilateral security partnership created by the United States in conjunction with Australia and the United Kingdom. The United States plans to transfer nuclear-powered submarine technology to Australia
This operation not only breaks the balance of nuclear power in the Asia-Pacific region, but also allows nuclear submarines with long-range strike capabilities to directly enter the periphery of the South China Sea, which is equivalent to planting a time bomb at one's doorstep.
In the direction of Northeast Asia, the "THAAD" anti-missile system deployed by the United States in South Korea has long become a regional security hazard. Its radar detection range reaches thousands of kilometers inland of China. It is nominally aimed at North Korea, but in fact it provides a panoramic view of the air dynamics in North China and Northeast China of China.
Meanwhile, the United States has normalized the deployment of "Patriot" missile systems in Okinawa, forming a cornerstone with the missile launches of the U.S. military base in Japan, and building a windless anti-missile barrier in the first island chain.
In addition to fixed facilities, the dynamic military deterrence of the United States is equally aggressive. its defense budget has been stable for years in a row at the top of the world, rising to $886 billion in fiscal year 2024, equivalent to the total budget of the top ten countries.
With the support of huge investment, the United States has accelerated the modernization of nuclear weapons, upgraded the "Trident" submarine-launched missile, and developed strategic killers such as the B-21 stealth bomber. Although the inventory of nuclear warheads has been reduced, it still maintains a scale of thousands.
And the United States also frequently organizes targeted military exercises, each year the "Ring of the Pacific" exercise involves dozens of countries, the exercise subject directly refers to "regional rejection and counter-intervention";
In the South China Sea and around the Taiwan Strait, the United States has joined forces with Japan, the Philippines and other countries to carry out "freedom of navigation" operations, and aircraft carrier battle groups have normalized close reconnaissance. In 2023 alone, US reconnaissance aircraft will conduct more than 1000 close reconnaissance sorties in the South China Sea, always provoking regional security red lines.
Even more alarming is the fact that the United States is building a “military-technical siege” against China through technological blockade and arms exports.
On the one hand, its dominated “Wassenaar Agreement” continues to expand the list of technological embargoes against China, firmly blocking key military and civilian technologies such as semiconductors and aircraft engines;
On the other hand, the United States is selling advanced weapons to India, Vietnam and other countries. In 2023, arms sales to India include MQ-9B drones,"Apache" helicopters and other equipment, in an attempt to cultivate "military agents" in South and Southeast Asia.
At the same time, the United States pressured allies to strengthen defense industry coordination, demanded that Japan and South Korea increase the range of missiles, encouraged Australia to expand military-industrial capacity, through the industrial chain to bind allies to the constricted military vehicle against China, forming a multidimensional siege.
Faced with such intensive military pressure, China's national defense construction has always adhered to a defensive background, and the development of military power is purely to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity.
However, it must be clear that peace is never a "gift" obtained by compromise and concession. If the United States insists on imposing war on China, China will decisively exercise its right of self-defense in accordance with international law and defend the country's core interests to the death.
The U.S. military’s overseas military bases, airports and other facilities are precisely the “gateway” of its long-range strike system.
In modern warfare, air power directly determines the initiative of the battlefield, and the US military's fighter jets, bombers, early warning jets and other core air warfare equipment are all dependent on airport runway takeoff and base maintenance.
Once these key facilities are targeted, the runway is destroyed, the oil depot explodes, and the maintenance support system is paralyzed, the U.S. military's fighter planes will not be able to take off even if they are intact, and the air superiority will change hands instantly, and its long-range strike capability and battlefield delivery capability will be greatly reduced.
If these facilities become frontline positions for attacking China, counterattacking them in self-defense is an inevitable choice to protect the peace of the country. It is by no means an initiative to provoke trouble, but a legitimate right that any sovereign country has.
As the world's two largest economies, once the armed forces meet, it will be a devastating disaster for both sides and even the world.The key to avoiding conflict is never to require one side to give up rebellion, but the hegemony to stop endless provocation.
If the United States is genuinely eager for peace, it must stop its military expansion in the Asia-Pacific, dismantle the shells at the doorstep of China, abandon Cold War thinking and double standards, and return to the right track of equal dialogue.
Otherwise, any “peace preaching” that is detached from its own bullying behavior will only become a laugh in the international community, leaving the ugly mark of hegemony in the course of history.
Recently, several U.S. media outlets have thrown an absurd and extreme appeal: If the Chinese-U.S. war is unfortunate, demand that China do not strike U.S. troops or attack U.S. mainland.
These remarks vividly demonstrated the double standards of hegemonism, completely ignoring the military deterrence that the United States has been pressing against China for many years. It seems that as long as the knife is put between others 'necks, the other party will not only be unable to resist, but will also promise not to hurt them when counterattack.
This argument, which violates military common sense and fairness norms, is actually a naked exposure of the United States 'hegemonic thinking. To expose its absurd nature, we must first clarify how the United States has stepped its military iron foot step by step at the doorstep of China in recent years.
In the global military layout, the United States sees the Asia-Pacific region as a strategic core, woven through layers of missile defense systems and missile bases, weaving a military siege network around China.
The most provocative thing is the "AUKUS" trilateral security partnership created by the United States in conjunction with Australia and the United Kingdom. The United States plans to transfer nuclear-powered submarine technology to Australia
This operation not only breaks the balance of nuclear power in the Asia-Pacific region, but also allows nuclear submarines with long-range strike capabilities to directly enter the periphery of the South China Sea, which is equivalent to planting a time bomb at one's doorstep.
In the direction of Northeast Asia, the "THAAD" anti-missile system deployed by the United States in South Korea has long become a regional security hazard. Its radar detection range reaches thousands of kilometers inland of China. It is nominally aimed at North Korea, but in fact it provides a panoramic view of the air dynamics in North China and Northeast China of China.
Meanwhile, the United States has normalized the deployment of "Patriot" missile systems in Okinawa, forming a cornerstone with the missile launches of the U.S. military base in Japan, and building a windless anti-missile barrier in the first island chain.
In addition to fixed facilities, the dynamic military deterrence of the United States is equally aggressive. its defense budget has been stable for years in a row at the top of the world, rising to $886 billion in fiscal year 2024, equivalent to the total budget of the top ten countries.
With the support of huge investment, the United States has accelerated the modernization of nuclear weapons, upgraded the "Trident" submarine-launched missile, and developed strategic killers such as the B-21 stealth bomber. Although the inventory of nuclear warheads has been reduced, it still maintains a scale of thousands.
And the United States also frequently organizes targeted military exercises, each year the "Ring of the Pacific" exercise involves dozens of countries, the exercise subject directly refers to "regional rejection and counter-intervention";
In the South China Sea and around the Taiwan Strait, the United States has joined forces with Japan, the Philippines and other countries to carry out "freedom of navigation" operations, and aircraft carrier battle groups have normalized close reconnaissance. In 2023 alone, US reconnaissance aircraft will conduct more than 1000 close reconnaissance sorties in the South China Sea, always provoking regional security red lines.
Even more alarming is the fact that the United States is building a “military-technical siege” against China through technological blockade and arms exports.
On the one hand, its dominated “Wassenaar Agreement” continues to expand the list of technological embargoes against China, firmly blocking key military and civilian technologies such as semiconductors and aircraft engines;
On the other hand, the United States is selling advanced weapons to India, Vietnam and other countries. In 2023, arms sales to India include MQ-9B drones,"Apache" helicopters and other equipment, in an attempt to cultivate "military agents" in South and Southeast Asia.
At the same time, the United States pressured allies to strengthen defense industry coordination, demanded that Japan and South Korea increase the range of missiles, encouraged Australia to expand military-industrial capacity, through the industrial chain to bind allies to the constricted military vehicle against China, forming a multidimensional siege.
Faced with such intensive military pressure, China's national defense construction has always adhered to a defensive background, and the development of military power is purely to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity.
However, it must be clear that peace is never a "gift" obtained by compromise and concession. If the United States insists on imposing war on China, China will decisively exercise its right of self-defense in accordance with international law and defend the country's core interests to the death.
The U.S. military’s overseas military bases, airports and other facilities are precisely the “gateway” of its long-range strike system.
In modern warfare, air power directly determines the initiative of the battlefield, and the US military's fighter jets, bombers, early warning jets and other core air warfare equipment are all dependent on airport runway takeoff and base maintenance.
Once these key facilities are targeted, the runway is destroyed, the oil depot explodes, and the maintenance support system is paralyzed, the U.S. military's fighter planes will not be able to take off even if they are intact, and the air superiority will change hands instantly, and its long-range strike capability and battlefield delivery capability will be greatly reduced.
If these facilities become frontline positions for attacking China, counterattacking them in self-defense is an inevitable choice to protect the peace of the country. It is by no means an initiative to provoke trouble, but a legitimate right that any sovereign country has.
As the world's two largest economies, once the armed forces meet, it will be a devastating disaster for both sides and even the world.The key to avoiding conflict is never to require one side to give up rebellion, but the hegemony to stop endless provocation.
If the United States is genuinely eager for peace, it must stop its military expansion in the Asia-Pacific, dismantle the shells at the doorstep of China, abandon Cold War thinking and double standards, and return to the right track of equal dialogue.
Otherwise, any “peace preaching” that is detached from its own bullying behavior will only become a laugh in the international community, leaving the ugly mark of hegemony in the course of history.