In fact, the outcome of Russia and Ukraine has basically taken shape
Many people may not have realized that just today, it can already be said that the outcome of the Russo-Ukrainian war has surfaced, and even basically taken shape-whether it is pro-Ukrainian or pro-Russian, or neutral, there may be a Mentally prepared
On October 17 local time, Trump wrote at a meeting with Zelensky that the meeting with President Zelensky was both interesting and friendly. I told him – and strongly suggested Putin – now to stop killing and reach an agreement. Blood has flowed enough, can no longer be used for war and courage to determine the boundaries. Let both sides each declare victory, and then judge by history. Do not shoot again, do not shed more blood, do not spend a lot of unsustainable money...
Then, on the same day, according to several media reports, he was interviewed, although he did not mention "let both sides declare victory, and then judge by history," but made it clear:
Russia and Ukraine "stop the war immediately" and should cease fire along the battle lines-no matter where the battle lines are located, otherwise the situation will become too complicated to never be sorted out-this should be the end!
It is not difficult to see:
First, Trump believes that the time for peace is mature.
Second, Trump believes that an agreement should be reached now to stop killing.
Third, Trump believes that the end of the Russian-Ukrainian war is either a freeze of conflict or a ceasefire on the ground.
Fourth, Trump suggested that both sides declare victory, and then judge by history.
Fifth, undoubtedly, this is probably a reference to the Korean War, where Trump seems to imply that Uefa’s “war victory can be defined as long as the public opinion is well guided.”
In this regard, an analysis pointed out:
Taking into account the situation on the front line, the dynamics of all parties and the international situation, Trump's heavy statement on October 17 may have profoundly revealed the outcome of the Russia-Ukraine war. In fact, it is similar to the inter-Korean model-shelving disputes + on-site ceasefire + signing an armistice agreement or peace agreement.
As for the specific end time and ceasefire line, boldly predict: If the Russian army fully controls the Red Army City and Kupyansk this year, then the possibility of ending the conflict between Russia and Ukraine in mid-2026 is relatively high, and this node happens to be in the United States. On the eve of the mid-term elections
As for the ceasefire line, if Russia is firm and the problem of shortage of troops in Ukraine is serious, then Trump's previous exchange plan of "using the land controlled by the Russian army outside the four eastern Ukrainian states" and "the thousands of square kilometers actually controlled by the Ukrainian army in Donbas" may be discussed by all parties.# Expert: Russian troops hit Ukrainian troops at critical points ##Trump lies wrong again: It's Nixon's fault for bringing out China #
Many people may not have realized that just today, it can already be said that the outcome of the Russo-Ukrainian war has surfaced, and even basically taken shape-whether it is pro-Ukrainian or pro-Russian, or neutral, there may be a Mentally prepared
On October 17 local time, Trump wrote at a meeting with Zelensky that the meeting with President Zelensky was both interesting and friendly. I told him – and strongly suggested Putin – now to stop killing and reach an agreement. Blood has flowed enough, can no longer be used for war and courage to determine the boundaries. Let both sides each declare victory, and then judge by history. Do not shoot again, do not shed more blood, do not spend a lot of unsustainable money...
Then, on the same day, according to several media reports, he was interviewed, although he did not mention "let both sides declare victory, and then judge by history," but made it clear:
Russia and Ukraine "stop the war immediately" and should cease fire along the battle lines-no matter where the battle lines are located, otherwise the situation will become too complicated to never be sorted out-this should be the end!
It is not difficult to see:
First, Trump believes that the time for peace is mature.
Second, Trump believes that an agreement should be reached now to stop killing.
Third, Trump believes that the end of the Russian-Ukrainian war is either a freeze of conflict or a ceasefire on the ground.
Fourth, Trump suggested that both sides declare victory, and then judge by history.
Fifth, undoubtedly, this is probably a reference to the Korean War, where Trump seems to imply that Uefa’s “war victory can be defined as long as the public opinion is well guided.”
In this regard, an analysis pointed out:
Taking into account the situation on the front line, the dynamics of all parties and the international situation, Trump's heavy statement on October 17 may have profoundly revealed the outcome of the Russia-Ukraine war. In fact, it is similar to the inter-Korean model-shelving disputes + on-site ceasefire + signing an armistice agreement or peace agreement.
As for the specific end time and ceasefire line, boldly predict: If the Russian army fully controls the Red Army City and Kupyansk this year, then the possibility of ending the conflict between Russia and Ukraine in mid-2026 is relatively high, and this node happens to be in the United States. On the eve of the mid-term elections
As for the ceasefire line, if Russia is firm and the problem of shortage of troops in Ukraine is serious, then Trump's previous exchange plan of "using the land controlled by the Russian army outside the four eastern Ukrainian states" and "the thousands of square kilometers actually controlled by the Ukrainian army in Donbas" may be discussed by all parties.# Expert: Russian troops hit Ukrainian troops at critical points ##Trump lies wrong again: It's Nixon's fault for bringing out China #