US President Trump and Ukraine President Zelensky held closed-door talks at the White House on the 17th. According to US media quoted sources, Trump said during the talks that he would not provide Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine at present.

Two sources said Trump said ¡°at least at the moment¡± he did not intend to provide Ukraine with a ¡°Thatch¡± cruise missile, according to Axios News Network.Trump has made it clear that his priority now is diplomatic work, and he believes providing ¡°war-ax¡± missiles could disrupt diplomatic work.¡£Reports said that Zelensky immediately held a conference call with European leaders after the talks. A source said that many European leaders were confused by Trump's apparent change in attitude.

U.S. cable news network that Trump has made it clear that Ukraine will not currently get long-range missiles that can penetrate Russia. one official said Trump now has the impression of Ukraine that it is seeking to escalate and extend the conflict.

Ukrainian source: Zelensky shows map of potential targets in Russia

According to AFP, a source from the Ukrainian delegation revealed that Zelensky showed a map to Trump during the talks.It contains potential strike targets located in Russia¡£ The map indicates important targets of Russia's defense and military economy, and Ukraine hopes to attack these targets and force Russia to end the conflict.

Why does the United States have a subtle attitude towards supplying "Tomahawks" to Ukraine?

Regarding the issue of the United States providing Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine, Trump mentioned it when he talked with Putin on the phone and met with Zelensky, and each stated his position. Among them, you can seeThe United States has a very subtle attitude towards providing "Tomahawks" to UkraineWhat is this reason?

Meiyi is taking the initiative rather than being passive

Special commentator, Su Xiaohui:Whether the U.S. has supplied Ukraine with ¡°tacks¡± missiles or other long-range combat capabilities, and how the U.S. has advanced the negotiation process for the future Russian-Ukrainian conflict,One of the most fundamental determinants is America's desire to take the initiative rather than fall into passivity¡£

Special commentator, Su Xiaohui:Speaking of providing "Tomahawk",Recently, it seems that the attitude of the United States has waveredBefore the United States has repeatedly stressed that it has been discussing with Ukraine the possibility of providing "war-ax" missiles, and it seems that the upgrading of military aid to Ukraine is already in the process of implementation.It is not more in the interest of the United States nowInstead, it will cause more trouble.

Special commentator, Su Xiaohui:In the U.S. view, if it is possible to further promote the solution of the Ukrainian crisis through negotiations and enable the U.S. government to fulfill its presidential campaign promises, it is the best option for the U.S. but if it is not possible to change the defensive stance of both sides of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict because of the ¡°tactical axis¡±, instead of causing the U.S. side to take risks and pressure, this is not the U.S. choice. So now for the U.S.The first consideration in providing "Tomahawk" is one's own interests¡£

The United States still leaves room for upgrading military aid to Ukraine

Special commentator, Su Xiaohui:At the same time, it is clear that the United States is still weighing its interests on the issue of providing "Tomahawk". The United States has been considering the possibility and space for future military assistance to Ukraine, including upgrades. Providing long-range strike capabilities has always been an issue for the United States. So now is not the United States once again explicitly refusing to provide Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine.It's about maintaining ambiguity, even if he has more room at the diplomatic level to further exert pressure and influence on Russia. On the other hand, the United States is also considering subsequent military aid to Ukraine. In terms of military production capacity growth and subsequent benefits,Does the United States have greater room for interests¡£

The United States handles the Russia-Ukraine conflict within the framework of resetting US-Russia relations

Special commentator, Su Xiaohui:At the same time, we can again judge from recent trends that:The U.S. will now restore US-Russian relations as the main line of its foreign policy., hopes to handle the Ukraine crisis on the basis of resetting US-Russia relations. Therefore, we are communicating with the Russian side now, and we do not want a frontal conflict between the two major powers. We also hope that we can see further changes in the Russian side in terms of subsequent resolution of problems.