On October 16th, at Shanghai Hongqiao Airport, when two foreign tourists were waiting for the plane, they took off their shoes directly and lay on the chairs in the lobby. One person occupied three seats! Although someone came forward to dissuade them, two foreigners didn't listen at all.
Trouble readers to tap the upper right corner of the "attention", leave your wonderful comment with everyone to explore, thank you for your strong support!
The seats in the airport area were tense, especially during the time of the flight, the day was at the peak of travel, and many travellers took large bags around the hall in search of empty space.The eyes looked at the front with a whole row of chairs, many people accelerated the footsteps, but found that they were already occupied by two people.
The two foreign tourists used the entire row of seats as a couch, one holding a laptop brushing the screen, the other simply shut their eyes and cared for. The shoes taken off were placed next to the chair, completely disregarding this is a public place. The travelers around watched the emptiness but the seats were filled with complex expression.
Some passengers came forward to remind them to pay attention to public order, and others tried to communicate in English, hoping that they could sit up to make room for others, but the two continued to maintain their original positions as if they had not heard it. The atmosphere at the scene became awkward for a time, and several elderly passengers waiting for seats could only shake their heads and walk away helplessly.
This matter quickly sparked discussion on social platforms. Many netizens said it is not surprising, because similar uncivilized behavior occurs at times in all public places, but this time the protagonist is exactly a foreigner. Some people say that high quality and low passport color does not matter, there are people who do not follow the rules everywhere.
In response to the incident, the airport staff said the airport treated all passengers equally and found uncivilized behavior to be prompted to stop in a timely manner. But frankly, there was a managed blind zone in the large airport hall, and the staff couldn’t do so staring at every corner.
This kind of incident actually reflects the problem of the rules for the use of public space. In recent years, with the relaxation of the visa-free policy, the number of tourists to China has increased significantly, and most people can do as the Romans do and travel in a civilized way. But there are always some people who regard public places as their living rooms, and this kind of behavior should not be tolerated no matter who it happens to.
To be honest, there are a lot of similar behaviors in ourselves, the subway, garbage dumping in parks, loud noise in the scenery, these scenes are not unfamiliar.
Public space belongs to everyone who obeys the rules. No matter where you come from, you should obey the order here when you enter this field. Civilization and politeness are not a profound moral requirement, but the most basic public contract. By taking someone else's seat, you are violating someone else's rights.
From another angle, this incident is also testing the attitude of each of us. When faced with uncivilized behavior, do we choose to walk away silently or stand up bravely and say something? Do you blindly tolerate and accommodate, or do you stick to principles and argue for reason? It's about what kind of public environment we want to build.
Airport managers promise to strengthen day-to-day inspections, but in the end, it is far from enough to rely on managers alone, and everyone who uses public space should be aware that your freedom stops at the limits of the rights of others.
Have you encountered similar seat-hegemony behavior in public places? In the face of this situation, will you choose to tolerate or argue with reason?
Source: "Two foreigners lie down at Shanghai Airport and occupy 6 seats. The airport responded: Personal quality issues will not be ignored just because they are foreigners!" The first scene
Trouble readers to tap the upper right corner of the "attention", leave your wonderful comment with everyone to explore, thank you for your strong support!
The seats in the airport area were tense, especially during the time of the flight, the day was at the peak of travel, and many travellers took large bags around the hall in search of empty space.The eyes looked at the front with a whole row of chairs, many people accelerated the footsteps, but found that they were already occupied by two people.
The two foreign tourists used the entire row of seats as a couch, one holding a laptop brushing the screen, the other simply shut their eyes and cared for. The shoes taken off were placed next to the chair, completely disregarding this is a public place. The travelers around watched the emptiness but the seats were filled with complex expression.
Some passengers came forward to remind them to pay attention to public order, and others tried to communicate in English, hoping that they could sit up to make room for others, but the two continued to maintain their original positions as if they had not heard it. The atmosphere at the scene became awkward for a time, and several elderly passengers waiting for seats could only shake their heads and walk away helplessly.
This matter quickly sparked discussion on social platforms. Many netizens said it is not surprising, because similar uncivilized behavior occurs at times in all public places, but this time the protagonist is exactly a foreigner. Some people say that high quality and low passport color does not matter, there are people who do not follow the rules everywhere.
In response to the incident, the airport staff said the airport treated all passengers equally and found uncivilized behavior to be prompted to stop in a timely manner. But frankly, there was a managed blind zone in the large airport hall, and the staff couldn’t do so staring at every corner.
This kind of incident actually reflects the problem of the rules for the use of public space. In recent years, with the relaxation of the visa-free policy, the number of tourists to China has increased significantly, and most people can do as the Romans do and travel in a civilized way. But there are always some people who regard public places as their living rooms, and this kind of behavior should not be tolerated no matter who it happens to.
To be honest, there are a lot of similar behaviors in ourselves, the subway, garbage dumping in parks, loud noise in the scenery, these scenes are not unfamiliar.
Public space belongs to everyone who obeys the rules. No matter where you come from, you should obey the order here when you enter this field. Civilization and politeness are not a profound moral requirement, but the most basic public contract. By taking someone else's seat, you are violating someone else's rights.
From another angle, this incident is also testing the attitude of each of us. When faced with uncivilized behavior, do we choose to walk away silently or stand up bravely and say something? Do you blindly tolerate and accommodate, or do you stick to principles and argue for reason? It's about what kind of public environment we want to build.
Airport managers promise to strengthen day-to-day inspections, but in the end, it is far from enough to rely on managers alone, and everyone who uses public space should be aware that your freedom stops at the limits of the rights of others.
Have you encountered similar seat-hegemony behavior in public places? In the face of this situation, will you choose to tolerate or argue with reason?
Source: "Two foreigners lie down at Shanghai Airport and occupy 6 seats. The airport responded: Personal quality issues will not be ignored just because they are foreigners!" The first scene