The Preface:
U.S. Defense Secretary Hughes's speech once again pushed the country to the tip of the wind.
The US said it would take harsh measures if some countries continue to ignore the peace move.
The United States meant something in these words, but its directionality seemed clear to us based on the recent situation.
It is difficult for the United States to escape and is deeply trapped in the Russia-Ukraine conflict
This is not a sudden outbreak of emotion in the United States, it is an inevitable move under multiple pressures.
The Russia-Ukraine conflict seems to have deviated from the original expectation of the United States. It originally only wanted to drag Russia into it, but did not want to drag itself into it。
The U.S. control of the situation on the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield, coupled with many countries in which it is reconciled, believes that Russia will not last too long.
But Russia has been well prepared, and the recent strike on Ukrainian energy facilities shows that it is not unbearable, that Ukraine can not safely spend this winter.
Even though Ukraine is currently receiving assistance from European and Western countries, it cannot change the situation that the situation is turning to Russia.
Ukraine’s investment and output are disproportionate, consuming huge amounts but not seeing the advantage of Ukraine, and gradually reducing the scale of aid.
The European countries that have always supported Ukraine are also now facing fatigue, after all, not everyone has the courage to burn money.
Internal pressure from the United States has also gradually emerged, with more and more voices saying that the United States is paying for its wrong behavior, and the sentiment of the people against helping Ukraine has risen.
The U.S. is often concerned about the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, and most people think that it is not worth throwing the money into Ukraine’s bottomlessness.
The top U.S. officials wanted to create the illusion of peace through the ceasefire agreement, but Russia simply ignored this and even clearly pointed out that the United States was undermining the current routine layout of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
The United States made a big fuss about the ceasefire agreement, and Tomahawk missiles were threatened by moving out.
Russia's countermeasures directly positively and hardly responded to the United States, first putting out the revised nuclear policy emphasizing the seriousness of the problem, and secondly mentioned that the U.S. move is to raise the scale of the conflict to the nuclear level.
The U.S. is also concerned that Russia will not let things develop, signing security agreements with other countries and deploying military bases.
This made the United States feel pressure from Russia and was forced to respond to feedback from the previous ceasefire agreement.
The U.S. routine master, Europe and NATO carry the banner of aiding Ukraine
Although the U.S. says there are horror means, after all, the Russian-Ukrainian conflict witnesses have a part, both to let the Russian side compromise, but also not to put themselves in.
The U.S. was preparing to assist the Ukrainian warhead missiles, and the "offering" of the warhead indeed shook the Russian tiger.
After all, this missile has a coverage range of 2000 kilometers. If it is deployed on the border of Ukraine, it will be highly dangerous to Russia.
First, the missile itself is of extraordinary strategic significance, and secondly, the missile guidance will rely on the United States, which is equivalent to the direct participation of the United States in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
The Russian side directly claimed that this move is highly likely to create a “nuclear threat”!
The United States has considered it again and again. If it really steps on the red line drawn by Russia, it may not be able to bear it or will suffer it.
Hegseth also specifically named Europe at the meeting, saying that he would establish a NATO system led by Europe, which clearly meant that he wanted Europe to take the lead.
What the United States says is better than what it sings. It provides weapons to aid Ukraine itself, and European countries pay for it.
The U.S. side deepened relations with Ukraine, while earning money for military aid, the U.S. side earned itself but became a pedestal, which made Europe clear on the U.S. side's unpleasant eating scene.
The United States is immortal, and NATO has just reached an agreement to help Ukraine and is ready to provide economic and military support to Ukraine.
In fact, it looks like it’s actually human-blooded pancakes.
Economic support is being squeezed by small NATO countries, and military aid is the old guns that have been eliminated before, which are inconsistent with the previous promises made to Ukraine.
Ukraine becomes a pawn, and all parties play games in the Russia-Ukraine conflict
The throwing of the topic by the United States has caused ripples in the international community. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine seems to have become a victim and a pawn in the game.
Russia's statement shows its speed, accuracy and ruthlessness, believing that the United States is playing with fire and self-immolation, and that behind its aid to Ukraine is "nuclear risk." If we really provide Tomahawk missiles, it will be regarded as participating in the war, and Russia will definitely take countermeasures.
This Russian gesture has greatly weakened the American deterrent effect.
There began to be disagreements within NATO, and countries that supported the Ukrainian tactics even demanded the lifting of restrictions on Ukrainian military equipment, from missiles with range limitation to missiles without range limitation.
The non-supportive countries are rejecting American-style topics in their own methods, Germany is directly illuminating that Europe cannot be a battlefield, France is privately connected with Russia, and the EU's internal discussions about freezing Russian assets have also become a standstill topic. These so-called allies are each other’s ashes in the face of intuitive real interests.
Ukraine is the most embarrassing one standing next to it, and the destiny of the country is controlled by others.
It can only be a good taste for the United States, regardless of the success of aid to Ukraine or not, the heavy weapons of the United States are its last grass, and Ukraine is also clear in its heart that it was a scam.
Once the US-Russian dialogue has made breakthrough progress, the first and most sacrificable is Ukraine.
Deep in the quagmire, the hegemony of the United States is challenged
The United States 'public statement this time seems to focus no longer on the Russia-Ukraine conflict itself, but on saving its own status after it has declined.
The United States has always been used to controlling the overall situation in the international community, and suddenly found that this approach was no longer feasible.
Russia's tough attitude can make the United States feel threatened. Europe no longer blindly obeys, but demands independent development and cannot be a dependent on the United States.
The refusal to take sides mentioned by many countries in their statements on the Russia-Ukraine conflict is an impact on U.S. policy.
The United States itself has become a two-faced figure. On the one hand, it wants to contain Russia through war, but it does not expect that it will also be mired in a quagmire.
If you want to exert pressure through NATO, the member states can do their own thing, only recognizing interests but not the dominant position of the United States.
The United States still wants to use unilateral pressure to consolidate its position and gain the right to speak, but it did not expect its own weakness to gradually reveal itself.
Like the previous missile crisis, further conflict erupted and hegemony eased.
What's even worse is that the Russia-Ukraine conflict itself has an impact on the whole world. Global energy and food prices fluctuated immediately, but the profits of US military enterprises soared, which means that the world has to pay for the hegemonic game.
The U.S. statement in the international community can only be made in exchange for temporary concerns.
If we really want to resolve the Russia-Ukraine conflict, we have always relied not on weapons blessing and verbal deterrence, but on the respective concessions of both sides at the negotiating table.
At present, the world's eyes are fixed on the United States. If the United States really delivers Tomahawk missiles, the conflict itself is likely to develop in an extreme direction.
References:
US Defense Minister urges allies to increase purchases of U.S. weapons to strengthen military aid to Ukraine
202510/1606:39:03 Source: New China Network
US Defense Minister urges allies to increase purchases of U.S. weapons to strengthen military aid to UkraineInterface briefing October 16, 2025 08:02
Russian military expert: In order to deter the United States, Russia can deliver Hazel Tree missiles to Cuba! Ukraine reported: Ukrainian troops launched counterattack in multiple directions
2025-10-09 14:14:21 Daily economic news