China's persistent attitude made Trump panic. In the latest interview, he told the big truth. The American media, on the other hand, all watched the excitement one by one, and began to speculate on the issue of American aircraft carriers near China.

On October 17, local time, a reporter asked Trump: "On November 1, we are going to impose a 100% tariff on China, do you think this measure can continue?" to this question, Trump's answer was frank, he said, "not sustainable."

Since Trump himself knows that the move to impose a 100% tariff on China can¡¯t continue, or simply can¡¯t really start, why would he threaten China in this way?

At the same time, seeing the situation is so tense, some U.S. media has also begun to hype the Pentagon's move.U.S. renowned magazine Newsweek published reports: "At the moment, the United States has deployed two aircraft carriers near China!

However, everyone who knows about the situation in the Western Pacific knows that it is not the first time that the United States has deployed two aircraft carriers near China. The Newsweek refers to nothing but the Washington and Nimitz, the two aircraft carriers' long-term mission is to target the Indo-Pacific region and defend China. Previously, the "Washington" was moved to the Middle East because of tensions between Israel and Iran, along with Houthi armed operations in the Red Sea, so it had to go.

Therefore, the presence of two U.S. aircraft carriers near China does not mean that the Pentagon will make any action against China in the near future. In the final analysis, this is nothing more than hype by these American media. A few days ago, when talking about the Sino-US trade war, U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessant made it clear: "Officials from China and the United States are maintaining contact, and the United States does not want to decouple from China!" This shows that the channels for preventing misjudgment between China and the United States have not been disconnected, and communication channels including the Chinese and American military have always been in place. Therefore, in the short term, it is unlikely that there will be direct conflict between the two countries, or even misjudgment. At least not until the Pentagon's shipbuilding capabilities run out.

To sum up, more and more realities tell us that Trump is now very passive on trade issues. There are still more than ten days before November 1st. During this period, the Trump administration should find a reason not to impose 100% tariffs on China.

It is worth mentioning that these two days more and more industry giants have also begun to broadcast speeches.Hours ago, NVIDIA chief Yellow Lord said: "At present, NVIDIA's market share in China has fallen from 95 percent to zero, so to say that the United States wants to hurt China's strategy, will often hurt the United States itself more seriously like this!"