In two years, under the leadership of Netanyahu, Israel finally ended this Kazakh-Israeli dispute. With the return of the last 20 living male hostages, all the living hostages have been rescued.
The Israeli side also withdrew its main forces from Gaza according to the agreement, while Hamas returned, gathered thousands of troops, re-occupied the areas that Israel had evacuated, and began to execute Gazans who had helped Israel.
Anyway, this dispute is over. Even if there is war to come, it will not be a matter of rescuing the hostages. Netanyahu has basically fulfilled the promise he made two years ago to let the hostages go home. Although it is already difficult for Hamas to return all the bodies of the hostages that have been killed to Israel.
At this moment of national celebration, Israeli courts are lively again. A series of accusations against Netanyahu have once again surfaced.If these accusations are true, then 76-year-old Netanyahu, most likely to be sentenced to 13 years in prison and out of 90 years soon.
As early as 2019, Israeli courts raised three charges against Netanyahu.
Netanyahu is known as the evergreen tree of Israeli politics, because he has served as Israel's Prime Minister more than once. Israel's system is a parliamentary system. The president is equivalent to the chairman of a group company. The person who really makes decisions is actually the CEO of the group, that is, the prime minister.
However, he was not as high as those in the sunshine as he was.Netta served as Israeli prime minister for the first time from 1996 to 1999.He resigned in 1999 and was elected prime minister for the second time in 2009.
Between 2009 and 2021, Netanyahu held the throne four times in a row, and it was this experience that gave him the title of the evergreen tree in politics.
In 2021, Netanyahu’s cabinet failed and was only successful again until December 2022, after which he faced his biggest challenge to date: the Hamas flooding operation of Aksha in October 2023.
Many people think that the Western election model is messy, as if this is really the case, because often people change, it shows that the policy will change continuously, it also indicates that it will not be very stable and peaceful, the Western people are like turmoil, do not like the peaceful and stable days?
During his tenure in 2019, Netanyahu was charged with three charges:
First, Netanyahu and his wife were accused of receiving gifts from Hollywood media giant Arnold Milkan, including cigars, champagne, bracelets, clothes, and other items worth around $21,000.The purpose was to get Netta to help him renew his U.S. long-term residence visa, which violated conflict of interest laws.
Second, Netta was accused of reaching an illegal agreement with the publisher of Yedioth Ahronoth during the election campaign,In the agreement, Netta hopes that Yedioth Ahronoth will provide him with more positive reports.
Third, Netanyahu is accused of having modified regulatory policies to illegally earn hundreds of millions of shekels to Elovich, a shareholder of Bezerk Telecommunications.In exchange for Elovich’s media, he helped Netanyahu remove negative comments and push his comments daily.
Netanyahu was still in office at the time, and during the review period, he was still in the election and eventually won the election. Therefore, his Likud group has been helping him buy time. Hamas's military actions have actually helped Netanyahu delay his trial to a certain extent.
Wartime leaders, can they not be bound by these accusations?
In fact, there is no provision, but it has become conventional.If the leader is changed frequently during the war, it is very likely that the war will eventually fail.
For example, in old America, since the period of Washington, the president only served for a maximum of two periods, that is, eight years, of course, Washington only played a role of leadership, which was not really written into the law at the time. But during the time of Roosevelt, he experienced the Second World War. This period was not very suitable to replace the president, so Roosevelt breathed 12 years and 39 days.
There is no legal basis for this, but the American people have implicitly admitted it.
In the Twenty-Two Amendments to the Constitution, which were officially implemented in 1951, there were strict restrictions on the term of office of the president, no one can exceed two terms.
So does this exist in Israel? Of course, it doesn't exist. Substitution is stipulated in the Constitution, and no one can change it.
But since the charges began in 2020, why could Netanyahu delay these cases for five years?
To say absolutely nothing is impossible, Hamas’s Aksha flood operation, in fact, helped Netanyahu temporarily escape trial. Therefore, some conspiracy theorists believe that this case is almost the same as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
They believe that the old U.S. intelligence agencies at the time had long known that Japan was going to attack Pearl Harbor, but Roosevelt has not found any reason to declare war on Japan, so it was defaulted to let Japan do so.
Therefore, they also believe that Netanyahu faced charges and had to find a way to turn himself into a wartime prime minister in order to delay time. This can explain why the world-famous intelligence agency Mossad had no information about the Al-Aqsa flood operation.
The conspiracy theory, known as the conspiracy theory, is largely without evidence, but can also be spoken out. Individuals feel that this speculation is unreliable, after all, Mossad is not a private intelligence agency of Netta, they serve only Israel, not someone.
But it is undeniable that the war initiated by Hamas has indeed taken two years for Netanyahu.
In addition, Netta himself frequently delays trial times due to physical inadequacy, such as prostate surgery, the installation of a heartbeat, acute intestinal inflammation, and so on.
The Likud Group is not idle either. In order to help their leaders escape the fate of being tried, they are also constantly taking advantage of loopholes. For example, motions such as jurisdiction objections and evidence disputes were filed.
When the war ended, Netanyahu’s role disappeared.
According to our Eastern view, this is to kill the donkeys.Because Netanyahu had just completed his plan to rescue the hostages, he was immediately brought to court.
Yes, a bunch of cases five years ago, Netanyahu had to face again.This time there was no war as an excuse, the Likud group behind Netanyahu, temporarily not out, he himself currently has no physical problems, seems to be really facing this all.
According to the requirements of the Jerusalem District Court, starting from November 2025, Netanyahu needs to attend at least three hearings a week until all cases are tried.
It must be said that the Jews were cold-blooded enough.The prime minister who led them to win the war, who helped them to free the hostages, was so cruel.
For the country and the people, to put up such a meritorious word, don't say to be judged, even if it is a single page of the ethnic spectrum, let him work on the majority to the death, is also reasonable. after all, he has a debt to the nation and the country, on this point, is enough to enjoy the temple.
Is it really because the war is over that such leaders of the main war faction lose their value? I don't understand, I really don't understand. We can only think that these courts in Israel are just a formality and a play. In the end, Netanyahu will definitely be acquitted and continue to be his prime minister.
Churchill: We strive to win to give people the right to remove me
Since the Jews have been in Europe for thousands of years, much has been learned from Europe.Al Netha’s case has not yet ended, in Europe, they do not do much with this kind of thing.
So it really cannot be ruled out that Netanyahu will be tried in the future.
The most famous is Churchill, who, as British Prime Minister during the Second World War, led Britain to win the Second World War.
But when attending the Potsdam Conference in July 1945, he learned that he had lost to Attlee in the general election. For this reason, Churchill had to withdraw from the conference halfway and let Britain's new Prime Minister Attlee continue to participate in the Potsdam Conference.
Why is this happening? Shouldn't such a person stay in that position until he can't do it? Why did the British abandon Churchill? Because the British, like the Jews, do not know how to be grateful. They only know that after the war is over, there is a high probability that a leader of the war faction will not be able to lead them well in post-war reconstruction, so they need to be replaced.
Some materials record such a dialogue, but its authenticity is doubtful. Everyone is welcome to prove it:
Stalin was very incomprehensible about this, and he took a shot of Churchill's shoulder and said: Old Hook, you won the battle, but the English dismissed you, look at me, who dares to dismiss me?
Churchill laughed and said, "Didn't we try to win this war to give the people the right to remove me?"