In an interview with the media, President Miller said the world would be divided into the three spheres of power of the United States, Russia and China, but the United States is undoubtedly Argentina’s ally, whether you like it or not, this is the reality.
To be honest, Milley's attitude is to provoke "taking America's leg safe position", as for the long-term development of the country and the benefit of the people, we must first give way to the political interests ahead of us.
Millay's phrase "The United States is undoubtedly an ally of Argentina" exports, basically put the logic of the survival of small countries on the table, he is sure to know more than anyone, Argentina fell from the developed countries to the underdeveloped ranks, with the past unshakable diplomatic strategy can not get out of hand, but now still choose to the United States on the side, after all, there is a "coding" that can stabilize the exchange rate and help him cope with the mid-term elections, which is more real than anything.
If we really deal with Millay's attitude, we must have a correct sense of proportion and business can be done. After all, almost all of Argentina's soybeans and sorghum were sold to China in 2025 thanks to the zero-tariff policy. 40 ships of soybeans were sold in two days. We sold US$7 billion, which is a real mutual benefit.
This one-handed money-to-hand delivery transaction is the cleanest, no one owes anyone, even if he is an American ally can not affect the actual interests, but if it is about aid or long-term cooperation to be cautious, after all, his heart has long been distorted, the key moment must prioritize the face of the United States.
The US$20 billion currency swap agreement recently dropped by the United States is the most obvious example. On the surface, it is intended to help Argentina alleviate the currency crisis, but in fact it is all a hook condition, that is, not only to terminate military-related cooperation with China, but also to target civilian deep space observation stations. It has to open up lithium and uranium mines to U.S. companies, and even adjust agricultural product export taxes to make the U.S. soybean market.
Millay's face turned dark and silent throughout the meeting at the White House. He was not necessarily unaware that this was a loss-making deal, but in order to provide "life-saving money" before the election, he could only take on the hot potato first.
The mind behind this choice is actually not difficult to guess. Small countries really don't have much confidence in the game of big countries. The example of the United States engaging in color revolution in Latin America is there. If it is disobedient, it is a question whether its position can be kept.
Millay knew clearly that his term of office was only for a few years. He would first rely on the support of the United States to stabilize the situation. As for whether the people can benefit from the 20 billion yuan and whether they can maintain the benefits brought by cooperation with China, it is obviously not the primary consideration at the moment. Just like when he made harsh remarks to China before, he hurriedly sent his foreign minister to China to renew the currency swap agreement, it is nothing more than how beneficial it can be.
Interestingly, the United States demands Argentina to be reasonable, but no one dares to ask the United States, since it can force Argentina to withdraw from China cooperation, can we first withdraw from cooperation with Britain and return the island to Argentina?
You know, the Falklands issue is a thorn in the hearts of Argentines. If the United States really regards Argentina as an "ally", why doesn't it help? In the final analysis, this 20 billion yuan in aid is not friendship at all, but using Argentina as a pawn to contain others.
China's embassy in Argentina said "Latin America is not who's backyard", this is actually the key, cooperation should depend on who gives the real gold and silver benefits, who respects their choices.
China's US$18 billion currency swap agreement with Argentina has no strings attached, and the Deep Space Observatory has promoted local employment and scientific research. These are all tangible benefits. However, Millay can rely on the United States for short-term benefits. Whether it can be exchanged for long-term stability, I am afraid only he knows.
The above is just a personal opinion. Did Milei's move keep his position or lose the long term? What do you think Argentina will choose in the end? Feel free to chat in the comment section.
To be honest, Milley's attitude is to provoke "taking America's leg safe position", as for the long-term development of the country and the benefit of the people, we must first give way to the political interests ahead of us.
Millay's phrase "The United States is undoubtedly an ally of Argentina" exports, basically put the logic of the survival of small countries on the table, he is sure to know more than anyone, Argentina fell from the developed countries to the underdeveloped ranks, with the past unshakable diplomatic strategy can not get out of hand, but now still choose to the United States on the side, after all, there is a "coding" that can stabilize the exchange rate and help him cope with the mid-term elections, which is more real than anything.
If we really deal with Millay's attitude, we must have a correct sense of proportion and business can be done. After all, almost all of Argentina's soybeans and sorghum were sold to China in 2025 thanks to the zero-tariff policy. 40 ships of soybeans were sold in two days. We sold US$7 billion, which is a real mutual benefit.
This one-handed money-to-hand delivery transaction is the cleanest, no one owes anyone, even if he is an American ally can not affect the actual interests, but if it is about aid or long-term cooperation to be cautious, after all, his heart has long been distorted, the key moment must prioritize the face of the United States.
The US$20 billion currency swap agreement recently dropped by the United States is the most obvious example. On the surface, it is intended to help Argentina alleviate the currency crisis, but in fact it is all a hook condition, that is, not only to terminate military-related cooperation with China, but also to target civilian deep space observation stations. It has to open up lithium and uranium mines to U.S. companies, and even adjust agricultural product export taxes to make the U.S. soybean market.
Millay's face turned dark and silent throughout the meeting at the White House. He was not necessarily unaware that this was a loss-making deal, but in order to provide "life-saving money" before the election, he could only take on the hot potato first.
The mind behind this choice is actually not difficult to guess. Small countries really don't have much confidence in the game of big countries. The example of the United States engaging in color revolution in Latin America is there. If it is disobedient, it is a question whether its position can be kept.
Millay knew clearly that his term of office was only for a few years. He would first rely on the support of the United States to stabilize the situation. As for whether the people can benefit from the 20 billion yuan and whether they can maintain the benefits brought by cooperation with China, it is obviously not the primary consideration at the moment. Just like when he made harsh remarks to China before, he hurriedly sent his foreign minister to China to renew the currency swap agreement, it is nothing more than how beneficial it can be.
Interestingly, the United States demands Argentina to be reasonable, but no one dares to ask the United States, since it can force Argentina to withdraw from China cooperation, can we first withdraw from cooperation with Britain and return the island to Argentina?
You know, the Falklands issue is a thorn in the hearts of Argentines. If the United States really regards Argentina as an "ally", why doesn't it help? In the final analysis, this 20 billion yuan in aid is not friendship at all, but using Argentina as a pawn to contain others.
China's embassy in Argentina said "Latin America is not who's backyard", this is actually the key, cooperation should depend on who gives the real gold and silver benefits, who respects their choices.
China's US$18 billion currency swap agreement with Argentina has no strings attached, and the Deep Space Observatory has promoted local employment and scientific research. These are all tangible benefits. However, Millay can rely on the United States for short-term benefits. Whether it can be exchanged for long-term stability, I am afraid only he knows.
The above is just a personal opinion. Did Milei's move keep his position or lose the long term? What do you think Argentina will choose in the end? Feel free to chat in the comment section.