The relationship between China and the United States has recently become more tense. Trump, who has just returned to the White House, has focused on China, shouting in his mouth to talk, but with a big stick in his hand. This "side-talk-side threat" gesture, China has long seen, and has not eaten this set.

The spokesperson of the Ministry of Commerce responded clearly on the 14th:"I want to point out that the United States cannot threaten and intimidate new restrictions while talking. This is not the right way to get along with China."

The Chinese side is not afraid to talk, but refuses to talk in the atmosphere of the other side's wrong attitude.This is not a bad word, but the Chinese side's clear judgment of the current situation.

Attitude is everything

For China, negotiation is never a problem, the question is how to talk about it. Liu Pyeong Yu's speech expressed the Chinese attitude very clearly: negotiations must be honest, not pressure on the side to demand cooperation.

Looking back on the past few years, the economic and trade relations between China and the United States have been ups and downs, and the reasons are not complicated. Whenever the United States relents, the two sides can sit down and talk about something practical; whenever the United States starts to shout war and kill again, the negotiations cannot go on. This is not an accident, but lessons learned again and again, which have already shown the problem.

This time Trump has turned out the old script again, and his tone is sometimes tight and sometimes loose. Today he talks about cooperation, but tomorrow he will use tariffs to scare people. This capricious practice has seriously affected mutual trust. China is very clear that negotiations are not to show anyone, but to solve problems with real weapons. If the United States cannot show even the minimum respect and sincerity, the significance of negotiations will be lost.

The response of the Chinese side is not complicated, in fact, it is one word: not accepting threats, respect can talk about. This is not setting a new threshold, but reaffirming the most basic principle. If even this can not be done, then it can only go every way, without wasting time.

Trump's "bargaining chip"

In recent days, Trump opened fire on social media, accusing China of not buying U.S. soybeans, and plotting to deal with certain commodities, such as discarding eaten oil. At first glance, the situation was overwhelming; but people who understood a little about the background knew that this operation was more like a gesture than a practical policy.

Let's talk about the soybean issue first. Trump regards China's reduction in soybean purchases as a "hostile act." This sounds serious, but the issues behind it are actually much more complex. Trade is not a one-time transaction. It involves market rules, balance of supply and demand, and policy supporting. This is not something that can be solved with one sentence, nor can it be explained clearly by casually shaking the blame.

And he came up with the threat of ¡°debris oil¡± ¨C that is, waste oil, which is actually more like a secondary field. It does have a sense of presence in the Sino-U.S. trade, but far from being the core industry. Trump suddenly said this, obviously not because this product is important, but because he is looking for a card that ¡°seems deterrent, but actually costs little.¡±

The problem is, this practice of "choosing soft persimmons to pinch" has revealed that there are fewer and fewer means available to him now. He didn't dare to touch big fields, but small products couldn't get the table. Getting around can only make a fuss about the marginal areas. This strategy, in the final analysis, is a false shot, lacking substance and long-term planning.

China is no stranger to this routine. It is precisely because of seeing through this that China has not been rhythmized or intimidated. If your attitude is not correct, no matter how many threats are, it is useless. China's judgment is very realistic: this set can't scare people, but will only complicate the situation.

Behind the chaotic strategy is the situation of twisting Pakistan

This dispute between China and the United States is not just a trade friction. What it exposes is the confusion and short-sightedness of the Trump administration's China strategy. Since returning to power in 2025, Trump has continued his usual "tough style", but this tough style has no clear strategic direction.

A moment to fully disconnect, a moment to be willing to cooperate. At the same time, shouting to China to increase taxes, while releasing the "can talk" signal. Policy has no consistency, the goal has no clarity, in the end, is a set of "temporary compact, side-by-side" play. It looks very flexible, actually very passive.

Behind this chaos actually reflects the pressure the Trump administration faces at home. The U.S. economic recovery has not yet taken a firm hold, inflation is always on top of our heads, farmers in agricultural states are highly dependent on exports such as soybeans, and the energy industry is in a period of transition. In this context, he not only wanted to show tough line with China, but also did not dare to use big moves, so he could only test repeatedly.

And China¡¯s firm attitude is based on a clear awareness of the whole situation. China knows that in the current international pattern, disconnection is unrealistic, and pressure is also ineffective. The economic ties between China and the United States have long been deepened, and neither side can fully retreat.

This is not a fit of anger, but a strategic initiative. Instead of being led by the nose, it is better to set the pace of negotiations. China's current attitude is a rational choice after judging the situation and a clear protection of its own interests.

The problem is not how to talk, but how to talk.

This dispute once again illustrates a question: the contradiction between China and the United States is not the question of ¡°can we talk?¡± but the question of ¡°can we talk honestly?¡± China has never closed the door to negotiations, but will not compromise in the state of persecution.

If Trump really wants to solve the problem, it must first solve its attitude problem. You can't shout for cooperation on one side and frequently wave threats on the other. We can't regard negotiations as political performances. Every time we shout at voters, we don't do practical things.

China has clearly expressed its will and also expressed its bottom line: it is not not not not to talk, but not to talk like this.If the United States is willing to return to reason and show sincerity, China will naturally respond; but if it is still in the old road, it does not matter for China.

conclusion

Now Sino-US relations have reached a critical node. Continuing to spin in circles on the old road will only make the problems deepen and deepen. China has made a clear response: it is not afraid of talking, nor does it not talk, but it is unwilling to waste time in an insincere atmosphere. China's door is always open, but not everyone can push it through.

What Trump should do is not to continue to fiddle with some leftover threats, but to sit down seriously and come up with the attitude that a responsible big country should have. Because this time, China has made it very clear: if its attitude does not change, it will be in vain. The ball is on the American side. How to play it depends on them.

Source: The U.S. Treasury Secretary sends a signal of easing, the working levels of both sides maintain communication, and China reiterates its "fight and talk" stance on the tariff war--World Wide Web 2025-10-15 06:47