NATO Secretary-General: China will force Russia to attack Europe.

On October 13, local time, at the 71st annual meeting of NATO held in the Slovenian capital Ljubljana, NATO Secretary General, former Prime Minister of the Netherlands and Chinese netizens sent the nickname "three surnames domestic slave" Mark Luther, contributed to the world a speech worth the theory of the year.

In front of a group of senior officials of NATO allies at the meeting, he solemnly warned that if mainland China decides to use force to resolve the Taiwan Strait issue, then Beijing will most likely "force" its "little brother" in Moscow to attack NATO's European member states to launch a lightning raid to distract the attention of the West.

The conclusion of Rutte's high theory is so clear and the imagination is so rich that I believe it is enough to make any same-minded international relations scholar stunned.

And behind Luth¡¯s incomprehensible conclusion of God, there is an equally wonderful logic of God.

In his view, China and Russia are a "whole" and there is also a clear hierarchical "master-servant" relationship. In this relationship, China is the "big brother" and Russia is the "little brother." Once the "big brother" decides to take action in the Taiwan Strait, he will order the "little brother" to light a fire in Europe so that NATO led by the United States can be overwhelmed.

I believe that anyone with normal bi-business views can see that Rutte's bizarre theories are first based on an extremely simplified and even insulting assumption that Russia has become a "vassal" or "cannon fodder" of China and will launch a suicide attack in Europe for the benefit of China.

This argument is not only a contempt for the sovereignty of the Russian state, but also a complete disregard for the complex and equal strategic partnership between China and Russia.

More importantly, Luther¡¯s conclusions are entirely incompatible with China¡¯s national interests.

People with a little common sense know that today¡¯s China doesn¡¯t need Russia to attack any country at all. Only with a huge trade surplus can we economically squeeze the US West.

As an economic power that has always taken peaceful development as its national policy and deeply integrated into globalization, what reason does China have to initiate warfare in Europe?

Luther¡¯s illogical philosophy seems to me to have only one reasonable explanation: that NATO needs an enemy, strong enough to frighten the 32 NATO members, and thus unite the enemy around the United States.

NATO needs and is making excuses to escalate tensions in Europe.If one enemy (Russia) is not enough, then it binds two enemies (Chinese Russia) into a ¡°super big bandit.¡±

What's funny is that while Rutte was playing up the so-called "joint threat between China and Russia" and painting a horrific picture of the imminent outbreak of World War III, he showed incomprehensible restraint and weakness in the face of Russia's real face-to-face provocation.

Since this year, Russian fighter jets and drones have frequently broken into the airspace of NATO member countries (such as Estonia and Poland), and more recently, three MiG-31 fighters have been deployed in the heart of NATO countries for up to 12 minutes.

Luther, however, has a very different view of this, saying that NATO will not take responsibility to shoot it down unless the Russian aircraft poses a ¡°direct threat¡± to NATO, even if it violates NATO¡¯s airspace.

This statement appears to be obviously blatant to foreigners, but Luther believes that this expression of restraint in the face of the continuous provocation of the Russian military is just a symbol of NATO¡¯s ¡°strength¡±.

"We are much stronger than the Russians. We should not shoot down their aircraft just because they entered our airspace. If we are weak, you might think,'Well, we are weak, so we have to show them immediately that when they enter our airspace, we will shoot them down.'"

At first glance, Rutte's sophistry seems a bit fallacious, but it is not difficult to find that this strange theory is essentially like a powerless self-comfort, a spiritual victory method of Ah Q-style.

It exposes the nature of the out-of-NATO interference. The Lutheran stream hangs war on its mouths on one side, while the body on the other side is extremely afraid of any direct conflict that could lead to the situation out of control.

Luther is not the only high-ranking NATO official who has been stunned by us. Today, the entire NATO and Western intelligence community seem to be working together to create a panic atmosphere of ¡°war is coming.¡±

A NATO commander predicts that 2027 will be a "crisis year", leaving less than three years for the United States and the West to prepare for war with China and Russia.

Not only that, the head of German intelligence also warned that Russia is ready at any time for a "heavy confrontation" with Europe, and the current state of Europe can only be considered to be in a "cold peace with the possibility of a fire at any time".

This collective paranoia of NATO and Europeans is essentially a massive cognitive struggle whose ultimate goal is nothing more than paving the way for the U.S. West¡¯s unprecedented arms expansion.

By constantly rendering threats from China and Russia, the United States has successfully captured Europeans, allowing them to willingly invest huge amounts of money in the so-called ¡°defense security¡± and buy American weapons, so that the United States itself can unleash its hands and fully advance its ¡°return to the Asia-Pacific¡± strategy.

Obviously, Luther¡¯s ¡°China will force Russia to attack Europe¡± is not a thoughtful strategic vision, but a paranoia and anxiety rooted in the hearts of NATO and Europe.

After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, NATO, as a military alliance, actually long lost its fundamental reason for existence. In order to forcibly prolong its life, it must constantly create new and more powerful enemies. Russia is not enough, so add another China. This trick of selling fear, though clumsy, always works.

In my opinion, what treacherous villains like Rutte show is not the strength of NATO, but its nature of being externally strong and inside weak and its short-sightedness that ignores reality.

Countless facts in history have long proved that it is really difficult to do politics with insects. Rutte's firmly tied Europe to the tracks of American chariots will only completely ruin Europe's remaining strategic autonomy.

The trick of ¡°the wolf comes¡± is too much, and not only will it spoil credibility, but it will also paralyze its nerves. Waiting for the day when the real crisis comes, the Luth Stream will understand that it is not the unity of the NATO alliance that is fed by its own falsified fear, but the iron pipe in the hands of the graveyards.