[Sun] The South Korean expert was too daring to say, he said that if the United States gathered all its military forces to attack China, even 11 aircraft carriers and brought all the advanced equipment, the result is only one, and that is the victory of China.
South Korean experts predict: even if the United States uses all its military forces, it is difficult to host China, and it may be a terrible loss.
At the Seoul International Security Symposium, South Korean expert Jin Rongmin threw out a judgment that shocked the audience. This scholar, who has long tracked the military interaction between big powers, is not an impulsive remark.
U.S. military force to be deployed to the western Pacific would have to cross 16,000 kilometers of the ocean, and maintenance of the logistics supply line would take weeks, full of unknown risks.
However, China relies on its local railway and road networks to transport equipment from production bases to the front line in a short period of time, and the efficiency gap is obvious.
More importantly, the core military hub of the United States in the Western Pacific has long been covered by China's medium- and long-range precision strike equipment, and base security and logistical stability are facing serious challenges.
Kim Jong-un said: "China has mastered the superiority of the home field, anti-ship capabilities and the transparency of the battlefield, and even the 11 U.S. aircraft carriers together will not have to withstand a few rounds."
This confidence stems from the regional defense system that China has built for many years.
After continued development, China has developed systematic capabilities in the fields of long-range precision strike, high-speed ultrasonic equipment, unmanned combat and underwater forces synergy.
Ballistic equipment with anti-ship capabilities can quickly break through the defense circle of the naval combat platform, high-speed weapons with unique trajectories make interception unusually difficult, and unmanned reconnaissance aircraft and underwater forces can accurate monitoring of distant sea targets.
As Kim Jong-un stressed, "Now is not the age of who has said the number of aircraft carriers, the game is not the number, it is the rhythm, it is the system, it is the information."
This system advantage is the key to modern war victory. just like Pakistan with the help of the Chinese provided integrated air defense command system, in the small command room through the big screen to the overall position control, the strength of the 42 aircraft is played to the extreme, this is precisely the advantage of the systematic operation, allowing the advantage of a single equipment is enlarged by the overall combat force.
In the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the United States has invested a lot of military aid, the situation in the Middle East has forced it to prioritize the defense of its allies, and the large naval operational platform that can be deployed to the East Asian waters is actually far from conceived.
The loosening of the alliance system has exacerbated this dilemma. South Korea has made it clear that it will not endanger its own security due to third-party affairs-after all, its homeland is extremely close to surrounding hot spots and must give priority to protecting its own interests.
The existence of a nuclear deterrence system has fundamentally blocked the possibility of a full-scale conflict.
China and the United States, as nuclear powers, have the strategic ability to deter each other, and no one can bear the consequences of any comprehensive military confrontation.This balance makes the two sides more inclined to dialogue rather than confrontation when dealing with differences, and also makes the cost of military adventures so high that it is impossible to imagine.
Kim Jong-un’s judgment points directly to the core: “If the United States really wants to engage in a military adventure in Asia, I’m afraid to first measure whether it can afford this price.”
China has overtaken in key fields such as electromagnetic launch, quantum communication, and unmanned combat clusters have shown leading advantages in application scenarios, and breakthroughs in the technology field have added to the bottom.
Kim Jong-un’s remarks are difficult to avoid without a chain reaction, South Korea’s strategic anxiety is becoming increasingly evident, knowing that China accounts for 26% of its total exports, excessive tendency to the United States will hurt its economy, in October South Korea’s Foreign Ministry made it clear to find a balance in both.
Modern conflicts have long surpassed traditional military confrontations. Asymmetric means and mixed games have become the norm. The era of relying solely on the number of equipment to dominate the situation is over. The "victory" of modern warfare is no longer the occupation of territory, but the achievement of strategic goals.
Jin Rongmin's core logic is that China maintains its own security by building effective defense capabilities and forcing external forces to pay an unbearable price when intervening.
In the final analysis, under the dual constraints of nuclear deterrence and regional defense systems, the cost of comprehensive military confrontation between major powers far exceeds the affordability of either party.
Future competition will ultimately focus on science and technology, economics and other fields, and dialogue and consultation, building an inclusive security architecture, is the only right way to safeguard peace.
South Korean experts predict: even if the United States uses all its military forces, it is difficult to host China, and it may be a terrible loss.
At the Seoul International Security Symposium, South Korean expert Jin Rongmin threw out a judgment that shocked the audience. This scholar, who has long tracked the military interaction between big powers, is not an impulsive remark.
U.S. military force to be deployed to the western Pacific would have to cross 16,000 kilometers of the ocean, and maintenance of the logistics supply line would take weeks, full of unknown risks.
However, China relies on its local railway and road networks to transport equipment from production bases to the front line in a short period of time, and the efficiency gap is obvious.
More importantly, the core military hub of the United States in the Western Pacific has long been covered by China's medium- and long-range precision strike equipment, and base security and logistical stability are facing serious challenges.
Kim Jong-un said: "China has mastered the superiority of the home field, anti-ship capabilities and the transparency of the battlefield, and even the 11 U.S. aircraft carriers together will not have to withstand a few rounds."
This confidence stems from the regional defense system that China has built for many years.
After continued development, China has developed systematic capabilities in the fields of long-range precision strike, high-speed ultrasonic equipment, unmanned combat and underwater forces synergy.
Ballistic equipment with anti-ship capabilities can quickly break through the defense circle of the naval combat platform, high-speed weapons with unique trajectories make interception unusually difficult, and unmanned reconnaissance aircraft and underwater forces can accurate monitoring of distant sea targets.
As Kim Jong-un stressed, "Now is not the age of who has said the number of aircraft carriers, the game is not the number, it is the rhythm, it is the system, it is the information."
This system advantage is the key to modern war victory. just like Pakistan with the help of the Chinese provided integrated air defense command system, in the small command room through the big screen to the overall position control, the strength of the 42 aircraft is played to the extreme, this is precisely the advantage of the systematic operation, allowing the advantage of a single equipment is enlarged by the overall combat force.
In the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the United States has invested a lot of military aid, the situation in the Middle East has forced it to prioritize the defense of its allies, and the large naval operational platform that can be deployed to the East Asian waters is actually far from conceived.
The loosening of the alliance system has exacerbated this dilemma. South Korea has made it clear that it will not endanger its own security due to third-party affairs-after all, its homeland is extremely close to surrounding hot spots and must give priority to protecting its own interests.
The existence of a nuclear deterrence system has fundamentally blocked the possibility of a full-scale conflict.
China and the United States, as nuclear powers, have the strategic ability to deter each other, and no one can bear the consequences of any comprehensive military confrontation.This balance makes the two sides more inclined to dialogue rather than confrontation when dealing with differences, and also makes the cost of military adventures so high that it is impossible to imagine.
Kim Jong-un’s judgment points directly to the core: “If the United States really wants to engage in a military adventure in Asia, I’m afraid to first measure whether it can afford this price.”
China has overtaken in key fields such as electromagnetic launch, quantum communication, and unmanned combat clusters have shown leading advantages in application scenarios, and breakthroughs in the technology field have added to the bottom.
Kim Jong-un’s remarks are difficult to avoid without a chain reaction, South Korea’s strategic anxiety is becoming increasingly evident, knowing that China accounts for 26% of its total exports, excessive tendency to the United States will hurt its economy, in October South Korea’s Foreign Ministry made it clear to find a balance in both.
Modern conflicts have long surpassed traditional military confrontations. Asymmetric means and mixed games have become the norm. The era of relying solely on the number of equipment to dominate the situation is over. The "victory" of modern warfare is no longer the occupation of territory, but the achievement of strategic goals.
Jin Rongmin's core logic is that China maintains its own security by building effective defense capabilities and forcing external forces to pay an unbearable price when intervening.
In the final analysis, under the dual constraints of nuclear deterrence and regional defense systems, the cost of comprehensive military confrontation between major powers far exceeds the affordability of either party.
Future competition will ultimately focus on science and technology, economics and other fields, and dialogue and consultation, building an inclusive security architecture, is the only right way to safeguard peace.