[China] North Korea wanted to buy China's J-10CE fighter aircraft was rejected, why China didn't sell it to North Korea?
(Source: Netease-North Korea wanted to buy China's J-10CE fighter jets but was rejected. Why didn't China sell them to North Korea?)
The rumor that North Korea wanted to buy our J-10CE fighter aircraft but did not buy it is not so simple.This is not a business breakdown at all, but a big game about international credibility, geo-security and neighbourly relations, and every step of China on the chessboard has been calculated extremely accurately.
Behind this is first an insurmountable red line. Since North Korea conducted a nuclear test in 2006, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1718, closing the door to arms sales to North Korea. Subsequent resolutions even blocked the door.
China, as one of the Security Council’s five constants, speaks heavily, relying on a “letter” word. If it does not abide by its own rules, then what will it say internationally?Look at Russia’s situation because of some international affairs being sanctioned, this is a vivid example, for the district a weapons sale, to fall into isolation, it is indeed to be paid off.
Then turn your eyes back to the Korean Peninsula in front of your home. That place is like a powder keg. The situation has long been like a tight bowstring, and no one dares to fiddle with it easily. The J-10CE is no joke. As a third-and-a-half-generation fighter, it is equipped with an active phased array radar and can mount medium-and long-range missiles such as the Thunderbolt-15. It is considered a top student in Asia.
Once this weapon, which is enough to change the war situation, enters North Korea, the existing military balance will be immediately broken. At that time, South Korea will definitely clamor for the United States to send more F-35s, and Japan will find an excellent excuse to expand its armaments. With a new round of arms race, the peninsula will only be more dangerous, but North Korea's own security environment will deteriorate.
For ourselves, the "THAAD" system deployed by the United States in South Korea is a headache enough. If we send them another excuse of "China threat", wouldn't it lure wolves into the house and allow more military forces to be deployed to us?
Moreover, China has been trying hard to promote the Six-Party Talks, trying to get everyone to sit down and talk. As a result, it doesn't logically make sense to persuade peace and hand knives at the same time.
In fact, the true long-lasting sense of security is never based on a few advanced weapons, but on stable development and improvement of people's livelihoods.It is clearer to calculate an economic account, a jet 10CE offers about $ 40 million, and North Korea's military spending per year is also $ 4 billion.
This huge amount of money, if taken to repair railways and upgrade a civilian aircraft, will bring a much bigger change than a few aircraft.In addition, North Korea has also changed its focus in recent years, and they have invested a lot in missile and drone technology, which has become their new safety pillar, and their reliance on traditional fighter aircraft is actually decreasing.
Therefore, China-DPRK relations are exploring a new model, from pure aid to more solid cooperation in energy, trade and infrastructure construction. True friendship is to walk forward hand in hand and develop together, instead of giving an expensive gift and finishing it.
All in all, the decision not to sell the J-10CE is a comprehensive consideration of international, regional, economic, reputation and other factors. This is not only to protect ourselves, but also to maintain peace and stability in the whole region, including North Korea, in a more responsible and long-term way. Well, when playing chess, sometimes you know how to give up a pawn in order to win the whole game.
(Source: Netease-North Korea wanted to buy China's J-10CE fighter jets but was rejected. Why didn't China sell them to North Korea?)
The rumor that North Korea wanted to buy our J-10CE fighter aircraft but did not buy it is not so simple.This is not a business breakdown at all, but a big game about international credibility, geo-security and neighbourly relations, and every step of China on the chessboard has been calculated extremely accurately.
Behind this is first an insurmountable red line. Since North Korea conducted a nuclear test in 2006, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1718, closing the door to arms sales to North Korea. Subsequent resolutions even blocked the door.
China, as one of the Security Council’s five constants, speaks heavily, relying on a “letter” word. If it does not abide by its own rules, then what will it say internationally?Look at Russia’s situation because of some international affairs being sanctioned, this is a vivid example, for the district a weapons sale, to fall into isolation, it is indeed to be paid off.
Then turn your eyes back to the Korean Peninsula in front of your home. That place is like a powder keg. The situation has long been like a tight bowstring, and no one dares to fiddle with it easily. The J-10CE is no joke. As a third-and-a-half-generation fighter, it is equipped with an active phased array radar and can mount medium-and long-range missiles such as the Thunderbolt-15. It is considered a top student in Asia.
Once this weapon, which is enough to change the war situation, enters North Korea, the existing military balance will be immediately broken. At that time, South Korea will definitely clamor for the United States to send more F-35s, and Japan will find an excellent excuse to expand its armaments. With a new round of arms race, the peninsula will only be more dangerous, but North Korea's own security environment will deteriorate.
For ourselves, the "THAAD" system deployed by the United States in South Korea is a headache enough. If we send them another excuse of "China threat", wouldn't it lure wolves into the house and allow more military forces to be deployed to us?
Moreover, China has been trying hard to promote the Six-Party Talks, trying to get everyone to sit down and talk. As a result, it doesn't logically make sense to persuade peace and hand knives at the same time.
In fact, the true long-lasting sense of security is never based on a few advanced weapons, but on stable development and improvement of people's livelihoods.It is clearer to calculate an economic account, a jet 10CE offers about $ 40 million, and North Korea's military spending per year is also $ 4 billion.
This huge amount of money, if taken to repair railways and upgrade a civilian aircraft, will bring a much bigger change than a few aircraft.In addition, North Korea has also changed its focus in recent years, and they have invested a lot in missile and drone technology, which has become their new safety pillar, and their reliance on traditional fighter aircraft is actually decreasing.
Therefore, China-DPRK relations are exploring a new model, from pure aid to more solid cooperation in energy, trade and infrastructure construction. True friendship is to walk forward hand in hand and develop together, instead of giving an expensive gift and finishing it.
All in all, the decision not to sell the J-10CE is a comprehensive consideration of international, regional, economic, reputation and other factors. This is not only to protect ourselves, but also to maintain peace and stability in the whole region, including North Korea, in a more responsible and long-term way. Well, when playing chess, sometimes you know how to give up a pawn in order to win the whole game.