If we continue to fight, Russia will not be able to end it! In the Russia-Ukraine conflict, we found that Russia often carries out large-scale air strikes, but Ukraine is now unable to launch large-scale counterattacks. It is not because Russia is too strong, but because Ukraine lacks excellent soldiers. This is the truth.
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has lasted for more than three years. The war has escalated rapidly from the initial stage to its current stalemate and has evolved into a protracted war of attrition.
Russia continues to launch large-scale airstrikes with its strong military resources, while Ukraine is becoming increasingly weak in response.
On the surface, Russia’s strength appears to be the main reason for Ukraine’s passivity, but a careful analysis shows that Ukraine’s trouble is more due to its own weaknesses than to Russia’s invincibility.
The lack of good fighters and the highlighting of internal problems are the fundamental reasons why Ukraine has difficulty reversing the situation in this war.
The war is a magnifying glass that exposes many problems in Ukraine's military system.
While Ukraine received arms assistance and economic support from the West at the beginning of the war, the war was not just a test of equipment, but also a comprehensive test of human resources and strategy.
The reserves of excellent soldiers in Ukraine are markedly insufficient, and the military training system also has major flaws.
The long-running high-intensity war has further aggravated the shortage of human resources, making it difficult for Ukraine to form a sustained and effective counterattack on the battlefield.
It can be said that the war not only tested Ukraine’s military capabilities, but also exposed its deficiencies in social mobilization and resource allocation.
On the Russian side, while frequently launching offensives on the battlefield, a heavy burden is also hidden behind this "hard".
The war required huge investment of resources, and the long-term war of attrition put huge economic and diplomatic pressure on Russia.
The international community continues to impose sanctions on Russia, and while Russia tries to mitigate the impact of the sanctions in various ways, the prolongation of the war has undoubtedly seriously affected its domestic economies and the lives of its people.
It can be said that Russia's strength is more reflected in the tactical level than its overall advantages at the strategic level.
For Ukraine, domestic economic and social losses have been invaluable since the outbreak of the war.
The destruction of infrastructure, the ruins of cities, and the displacement of people have put Ukraine's state functioning in trouble.
Under such circumstances, Ukraine not only has to face pressure from the battlefield, but also solves reconstruction and people's livelihood issues in the rear.
This double pressure makes Ukraine’s performance on the battlefield more eye-catching.
Although assistance from Western countries has alleviated Ukraine's plight to a certain extent, this external support is ultimately limited and cannot fundamentally solve Ukraine's internal problems.
From a broader perspective, this war is not just a match between Ukraine and Russia, but a miniature of the game of great powers.
The military and economic support of the Western countries to Ukraine is based more on their own strategic interests than on mere moral responsibilities.
For Ukraine, over-reliance on external aid can maintain the basic situation of the battlefield in the short term, but in the long run, only by enhancing its own strength and solving internal problems can it truly change the direction of the war.
Otherwise, no matter how generous external aid is, it will be difficult for Ukraine to take the initiative in this conflict.
At the same time, the prolongation of the war also puts Russia under increasing pressure at home and abroad.
Although Russia is tough on the battlefield, behind this toughness is the continuous accumulation of internal and external contradictions.
The war isolated Russia's international relations, the consequences of economic sanctions gradually emerged, and domestic social sentiments became more complex.
For Russia, continuing the war is not a wise choice, because the conflict not only failed to bring the expected results, but also cost it an unbearable price.
Reference: CCTV News--Russia claims to have attacked Ukrainian military facilities and Uzbekistan claims to have suffered another large-scale air strike
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has lasted for more than three years. The war has escalated rapidly from the initial stage to its current stalemate and has evolved into a protracted war of attrition.
Russia continues to launch large-scale airstrikes with its strong military resources, while Ukraine is becoming increasingly weak in response.
On the surface, Russia’s strength appears to be the main reason for Ukraine’s passivity, but a careful analysis shows that Ukraine’s trouble is more due to its own weaknesses than to Russia’s invincibility.
The lack of good fighters and the highlighting of internal problems are the fundamental reasons why Ukraine has difficulty reversing the situation in this war.
The war is a magnifying glass that exposes many problems in Ukraine's military system.
While Ukraine received arms assistance and economic support from the West at the beginning of the war, the war was not just a test of equipment, but also a comprehensive test of human resources and strategy.
The reserves of excellent soldiers in Ukraine are markedly insufficient, and the military training system also has major flaws.
The long-running high-intensity war has further aggravated the shortage of human resources, making it difficult for Ukraine to form a sustained and effective counterattack on the battlefield.
It can be said that the war not only tested Ukraine’s military capabilities, but also exposed its deficiencies in social mobilization and resource allocation.
On the Russian side, while frequently launching offensives on the battlefield, a heavy burden is also hidden behind this "hard".
The war required huge investment of resources, and the long-term war of attrition put huge economic and diplomatic pressure on Russia.
The international community continues to impose sanctions on Russia, and while Russia tries to mitigate the impact of the sanctions in various ways, the prolongation of the war has undoubtedly seriously affected its domestic economies and the lives of its people.
It can be said that Russia's strength is more reflected in the tactical level than its overall advantages at the strategic level.
For Ukraine, domestic economic and social losses have been invaluable since the outbreak of the war.
The destruction of infrastructure, the ruins of cities, and the displacement of people have put Ukraine's state functioning in trouble.
Under such circumstances, Ukraine not only has to face pressure from the battlefield, but also solves reconstruction and people's livelihood issues in the rear.
This double pressure makes Ukraine’s performance on the battlefield more eye-catching.
Although assistance from Western countries has alleviated Ukraine's plight to a certain extent, this external support is ultimately limited and cannot fundamentally solve Ukraine's internal problems.
From a broader perspective, this war is not just a match between Ukraine and Russia, but a miniature of the game of great powers.
The military and economic support of the Western countries to Ukraine is based more on their own strategic interests than on mere moral responsibilities.
For Ukraine, over-reliance on external aid can maintain the basic situation of the battlefield in the short term, but in the long run, only by enhancing its own strength and solving internal problems can it truly change the direction of the war.
Otherwise, no matter how generous external aid is, it will be difficult for Ukraine to take the initiative in this conflict.
At the same time, the prolongation of the war also puts Russia under increasing pressure at home and abroad.
Although Russia is tough on the battlefield, behind this toughness is the continuous accumulation of internal and external contradictions.
The war isolated Russia's international relations, the consequences of economic sanctions gradually emerged, and domestic social sentiments became more complex.
For Russia, continuing the war is not a wise choice, because the conflict not only failed to bring the expected results, but also cost it an unbearable price.
Reference: CCTV News--Russia claims to have attacked Ukrainian military facilities and Uzbekistan claims to have suffered another large-scale air strike