Look, the West has started to "rob". No wonder many netizens say that the so-called "marine civilization" in the West is essentially "robber civilization".
A few days ago, Wentai Technology revealed the inside story of the Netherlands's "open robbery": the Netherlands directly forcibly took over Wentai Technology's wholly-owned subsidiary, Anshi Semiconductor, through so-called "legal means." Obviously, because the competition failed to win against China, it directly began to "open robbery", revealing its bandit nature.
But now China is not left to the Netherlands, and our response to this matter can be described with "hidden killer" and if the Netherlands refuses to repent, then I am afraid they will also face "unbearable" consequences.
The nature of the bandits revealed, and the Netherlands directly "robbed" it.
In the last few days, the semiconductor circle has exploded a "great thunderstorm", which is that the Anse semiconductor under the company of Thai Technology has been forced to take over by the Netherlands!
It is said that it is a forced takeover, but in fact, it is a direct "robbery", but it just gives you a high-sounding reason. To put it simply, as early as September 30, the Dutch government froze the assets and all businesses of Nexperia and its 30 companies and offices, requiring Nexperia not to "adjust" anything within one year. Everything has to be listened to the Dutch government.
Moreover, the Netherlands has also directly dismissed the CEO Zhang Shikori, who was sent to Zhang Tai Technologies, saying that it is necessary to store all the shares to the person designated by them. Even though the Netherlands seems to have said on the internet that Anselm Semiconductor can still operate within this year, but all decision-making power is in the hands of the Netherlands, what is the difference from directly "robbing" the company?
To know, Anselm Semiconductor but Zhang Thai technology real gold and silver spent more than 30 billion to buy back the full-funded subsidiary, how can the Dutch government "say to steal and steal"?
However, the Netherlands does have its own explanation for this "robbery". They feel that it is not robbery at all, but is protecting "the security of key technologies in the Netherlands and Europe" in accordance with their own laws.
Specifically, the Netherlands sought a few reasons that the Anchor Semiconductor would threaten “Europe’s security”. First, they said that Anchor had “serious governing flaws” inside, that is, that Thai Technology had problems with the management of the company, which could lead to serious problems for Anchor the entire company.
Second, the Netherlands said that the takeover of Anselm is to prevent Anselm from confessing to Europe. because Anselm although produced only relatively low-end semiconductors, but high production efficiency, high market demand, a lot of buyers, the Netherlands is afraid of sanctions on the Chinese side, Anselm "confessed" to Europe, so, first hand in hand, directly take Anselm over.
In general, the Netherlands is carrying the so-called "national security" flag, to do "crawling".
A letter of vote to the United States? Does it really work?
The problem is that the management of Anselm is definitely no problem, after all, Zhou Tai Technologies from 2019 to buy the Anselm semiconductor back, to the business of the heart, to make Anselm directly into the world's third-largest power semiconductor company, last year revenue of up to 14.7 billion, the amount of patents is also crazy growth.
Moreover, Anselm Semiconductor pays more than 100 million euros a year in taxes to the Netherlands and also creates thousands of jobs in Europe, which doesn’t look like a “internal governance problem” company.
And from this perspective, what Anselm Semiconductor is a company that has a "security threat" to the Netherlands, is clearly a "big money owner" that sends money and employment!
So why did the Netherlands want to steal the Einstein semiconductor?
As early as last year, the United States had included Wingtech Technology in the "Entity List", but on September 29 this year, the United States strengthened control rules, and Nexperia, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wingtech Technology, was also included in the "Entity List". blacklist ".
The Netherlands responded quickly and "took down" Ansei Semiconductor almost immediately. Who would believe it if it was not to give the United States a name?
Now, everyone can see that the Netherlands is just trying to show that its stance is consistent with the United States through "anti-China" and gain some benefits from the United States. Anyway, this is not the first time they have done such a thing. Of course, Anshi Semiconductor is now operating well, and taking it away will only benefit them, but no harm.
But the problem is, the Netherlands does not think about it, is Trump really reliable? The Philippines is an "anti-China vanguard" in the South China Sea. Trump turned around and said that the United States and China "get along well." Little Marcos did not get any benefits and completely offended China. If the Netherlands wants to follow this old path, they can also try it.
China responds to hidden murder, how should the Netherlands choose?
Regarding this kind of "open robbery" behavior in the Netherlands, Wingtech Technology has issued an announcement to safeguard its rights and interests in accordance with the law, and of course, our government will not watch Wingtech Technology suffer such a dumb loss.
China's Foreign Ministry has made it clear that we oppose "the generalization of the concept of national security" and "discriminatory practices against particular country enterprises" and stressed that we will resolutely safeguard our legitimate rights and interests.
Although these words appear to be "widespread", there are no concrete measures, but in fact, China's response to "hidden killing machine", the focus is on our intentional emphasis on the determination to safeguard our own rights and interests.
We’re telling the Netherlands that if they don’t want to correct their mistakes, we’re really going to do it.
On the one hand, the sales of goods such as Philips, Hype and agricultural products in the Netherlands are still very good in our country, and we can completely counteract these companies, which is probably enough for the Netherlands to "drink a can".
On the other hand, the most important thing is that our rare-earth export controls can not only be directed at the United States, but equally to all countries that need to use our rare-earth products. If the Netherlands does not comply with the rules, we can likewise "kill" them with rare-earth, even if they have the Anselm semiconductor in their hands, without rare-earth, what can they do?
We hope that the Netherlands can also seriously consider whether they really want to follow the United States 'path to the end. If they are unwilling to respect China companies and create a fair business environment, then we will "help" China companies fight for their due rights.
At that time, it is not certain whether the Netherlands can afford such a result.
References: