British scholars reveal the truth: The reason America has always targeted China is because China has made a big mistake. A country that has only been founded for two or three hundred years, a country that has not been strong for a hundred years, dares to call it the "habit" to be the leader of the world.
Trouble see the official gentlemen in the upper right corner click on "attention", which is both convenient for you to discuss and share, but can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
Since the reform and opening up, China's development has made the world's attention.In just a few decades, China's total economy has jumped to the world's forefront, the level of science and technology has continued to rise, and international influence has gradually increased.
The famous British scholar Jacques said at an academic seminar that the fundamental reason why the United States continues to target China is not trade friction or technology competition as simple as it is, but the deep anxiety about the rapid rise of China.
A nation that has only been founded for two or three hundred years and truly powerful for a hundred years, in just a few decades to catch up and even challenge its global position, is an unprecedented shock for the long-standing American leader of the world.
Jack stressed that the misjudgment of the United States about China comes not only from the conflict of real interests, but more deeply from the deviation in civilized cognition.The West has long measured the world with its own history as a measure, and lacks sufficient understanding of China, which has five thousand years of civilization accumulation and two thousand years of world peak experience.
The United States generally mistakenly believes that China's rapid development is "copying" the western model, so it adopts an arrogant confrontation strategy, but ignores the independence and systematicness of China's development model. China's modernization path not only draws on advanced technology, but also is deeply influenced by its own history, culture and governance concepts. This independence is the source of China's strong resilience in the face of external pressure.
In 1972, President Nixon's historic visit to China opened a new era of contact between the two countries; in 1979, China and the United States formally established relations, American enterprises gradually entered the Chinese market, from textiles and primary manufactured goods trade, gradually expanded to the field of electronics, information technology and high-end manufacturing.
The initial Sino-U.S. cooperation brought about not only economic growth, but also deep industrial chain bonds, the capital, technology and management experience of the United States complemented China's human resources and market needs, and has long been seen as a model for global economic development.
However, the global financial crisis of 2008 became the cornerstone of the U.S.-China relationship.U.S. economic problems emerged, and the turbulence of the financial system weakened its global dominance and also forced it to rethink its international competition strategy.
Starting in 2011, the United States restricted cooperation with China in the space field, trying to maintain an advantage in the field of high-tech; in 2018, on the basis of "national security", the imposition of restrictions on Chinese science and technology enterprises such as Huawei showed a clear technological protectionist tendency.
Entering 2025, the economic power of China and the United States will be close, with the United States 'share of the global economy falling to 26%, and China's share of the economy approaching 20%. At the same time, China has made remarkable achievements in infrastructure construction, making great progress in its high-speed rail network, port operations and energy development. At the same time, it has promoted industrial chain linkage through global projects such as the "Belt and Road" Initiative and China-Europe freight trains, creating a large number of jobs for countries along the route.
In contrast, the domestic economic problems in the United States have become prominent, social structural contradictions have intensified, the gap between the rich and the poor, the aging infrastructure, and the pressure on the education and medical system have been accumulating. Jacques pointed out that in this context, simple confrontation is not a rational choice, and cooperation is still the only realistic way out for China and the United States.
Jack emphasized in particular that the misjudgment of the United States about China lies in the limitations of its civilized perception.The West tends to judge other countries on its own historical experience and institutions as the benchmark, while China's development model is deeply influenced by five thousand years of civilization accumulation and historical governance ideas, and it is impossible to simply imitate Western experience.
The historical trajectory of Sino-US relations shows that both sides compete and must cooperate. In areas such as science and technology, economy and global governance, cooperation can bring mutual benefit, while confrontation can lead to a lose-lose situation. Taking the aerospace field as an example, before 2010, China and the United States had extensive cooperation in satellite navigation, space experiments and other projects. This not only improved China's scientific and technological level, but also brought new markets and opportunities to American companies.
However, as the U.S. restricts cooperation, competition in these areas increases, China accelerates its own R&D pace, and the U.S. loses some of its technological advantage and market influence.
The realistic logic of Sino-US relations shows that both sides should seek balanced cooperation on the basis of mutual benefit. Cooperation in the fields of science and technology and economics can not only promote global innovation and industrial development, but also ease geopolitical tensions and reduce global economic risks.
Although the confrontation strategy can have a deterrent effect in the short term, it may lead to global order turmoil and economic losses for both sides in the long run. Jacques stressed that China and the United States need to achieve a win-win situation through cooperation, instead of falling into zero-sum competition.
The U.S. is not rooted in merely trade or technological conflict, but in strategic anxiety about China’s rise and civilized perception deviations.China’s rapid development, unique governance patterns and historical cultural accumulation have demonstrated its inescapable power on the global stage.
For the United States, understanding China's development logic, adjusting its strategic thinking, and seeking win-win cooperation is the rational choice to avoid conflict and maintain global stability; for China, adhering to independent development, deepening global cooperation, and balancing external pressure is the key way to long-term stability.
Trouble see the official gentlemen in the upper right corner click on "attention", which is both convenient for you to discuss and share, but can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
Since the reform and opening up, China's development has made the world's attention.In just a few decades, China's total economy has jumped to the world's forefront, the level of science and technology has continued to rise, and international influence has gradually increased.
The famous British scholar Jacques said at an academic seminar that the fundamental reason why the United States continues to target China is not trade friction or technology competition as simple as it is, but the deep anxiety about the rapid rise of China.
A nation that has only been founded for two or three hundred years and truly powerful for a hundred years, in just a few decades to catch up and even challenge its global position, is an unprecedented shock for the long-standing American leader of the world.
Jack stressed that the misjudgment of the United States about China comes not only from the conflict of real interests, but more deeply from the deviation in civilized cognition.The West has long measured the world with its own history as a measure, and lacks sufficient understanding of China, which has five thousand years of civilization accumulation and two thousand years of world peak experience.
The United States generally mistakenly believes that China's rapid development is "copying" the western model, so it adopts an arrogant confrontation strategy, but ignores the independence and systematicness of China's development model. China's modernization path not only draws on advanced technology, but also is deeply influenced by its own history, culture and governance concepts. This independence is the source of China's strong resilience in the face of external pressure.
In 1972, President Nixon's historic visit to China opened a new era of contact between the two countries; in 1979, China and the United States formally established relations, American enterprises gradually entered the Chinese market, from textiles and primary manufactured goods trade, gradually expanded to the field of electronics, information technology and high-end manufacturing.
The initial Sino-U.S. cooperation brought about not only economic growth, but also deep industrial chain bonds, the capital, technology and management experience of the United States complemented China's human resources and market needs, and has long been seen as a model for global economic development.
However, the global financial crisis of 2008 became the cornerstone of the U.S.-China relationship.U.S. economic problems emerged, and the turbulence of the financial system weakened its global dominance and also forced it to rethink its international competition strategy.
Starting in 2011, the United States restricted cooperation with China in the space field, trying to maintain an advantage in the field of high-tech; in 2018, on the basis of "national security", the imposition of restrictions on Chinese science and technology enterprises such as Huawei showed a clear technological protectionist tendency.
Entering 2025, the economic power of China and the United States will be close, with the United States 'share of the global economy falling to 26%, and China's share of the economy approaching 20%. At the same time, China has made remarkable achievements in infrastructure construction, making great progress in its high-speed rail network, port operations and energy development. At the same time, it has promoted industrial chain linkage through global projects such as the "Belt and Road" Initiative and China-Europe freight trains, creating a large number of jobs for countries along the route.
In contrast, the domestic economic problems in the United States have become prominent, social structural contradictions have intensified, the gap between the rich and the poor, the aging infrastructure, and the pressure on the education and medical system have been accumulating. Jacques pointed out that in this context, simple confrontation is not a rational choice, and cooperation is still the only realistic way out for China and the United States.
Jack emphasized in particular that the misjudgment of the United States about China lies in the limitations of its civilized perception.The West tends to judge other countries on its own historical experience and institutions as the benchmark, while China's development model is deeply influenced by five thousand years of civilization accumulation and historical governance ideas, and it is impossible to simply imitate Western experience.
The historical trajectory of Sino-US relations shows that both sides compete and must cooperate. In areas such as science and technology, economy and global governance, cooperation can bring mutual benefit, while confrontation can lead to a lose-lose situation. Taking the aerospace field as an example, before 2010, China and the United States had extensive cooperation in satellite navigation, space experiments and other projects. This not only improved China's scientific and technological level, but also brought new markets and opportunities to American companies.
However, as the U.S. restricts cooperation, competition in these areas increases, China accelerates its own R&D pace, and the U.S. loses some of its technological advantage and market influence.
The realistic logic of Sino-US relations shows that both sides should seek balanced cooperation on the basis of mutual benefit. Cooperation in the fields of science and technology and economics can not only promote global innovation and industrial development, but also ease geopolitical tensions and reduce global economic risks.
Although the confrontation strategy can have a deterrent effect in the short term, it may lead to global order turmoil and economic losses for both sides in the long run. Jacques stressed that China and the United States need to achieve a win-win situation through cooperation, instead of falling into zero-sum competition.
The U.S. is not rooted in merely trade or technological conflict, but in strategic anxiety about China’s rise and civilized perception deviations.China’s rapid development, unique governance patterns and historical cultural accumulation have demonstrated its inescapable power on the global stage.
For the United States, understanding China's development logic, adjusting its strategic thinking, and seeking win-win cooperation is the rational choice to avoid conflict and maintain global stability; for China, adhering to independent development, deepening global cooperation, and balancing external pressure is the key way to long-term stability.