There was a death order from NASA, and all the Chinese with American visas, no matter who you are, sorry, all the NASA projects, you don¡¯t want to touch.This wall is built, it is called an impenetrable wind. Not only is the project can not participate, even the door of the internal database is welded to you, the invitation letter of the scientific conference? don't think. This scenario is simply to completely close the door, play with yourself, engage in a complete "technology cold war".

A NASA spokesman also solemnly defended it, claiming that this was an "internal preventive measure" taken for the so-called "work safety". This sounds grandiose, but in fact it is full of loopholes and prejudice.

NASA's new chief executive officer, Daffy, is still running the train. In his internal speech, he crazyly expressed anxiety, shouting ¡°We¡¯re going to defeat China on the moon,¡± ¡°We¡¯re going to land on the moon faster than China,¡± and even rumored that if China ran first it would be ¡°live and see ghosts.¡±

He also vowed that the U.S. would return to the moon quickly and safely and win the second space race.

Remember the 1978 gram of the moon?The big crystal ball in the palm, the people of the whole country look like a baby.Now, don't say send, the Americans even let our scientists in the past to talk and exchange the opportunity to find out.From that notorious ¡°Wolf Clause¡± to later simply not giving scholars a visa, which U.S. closed a door, clearly wanted to wreck you the whole way.

This "space wall" of the United States is not the product of the heart-blooding, it is a systematic project, from law to administration to diplomacy, layer-up, the purpose is one: to completely isolate China outside.

In fact, it was just a paper ban, cut off the possibility of cooperation between NASA and any official Chinese space agency.This case exploded inside the American scientific community itself.

The mouth of the law was blocked, and the administrative level began to pour concrete upwards.NASA¡¯s recent internal directive tightened the wall. The directive clearly stipulates that Chinese citizens holding a US visa must not participate in any of its projects, can not access the database, and even relevant scientific conferences can not participate.

A spokesman for NASA came forward and explained that it was just an "internal precaution" for "job safety."But everyone can see that behind this talk, is the real purpose of complete isolation. It is not yet over, the wall extends to the diplomatic field. The United States led a return to the moon program called "Alphonse Messe", want to join?

This agreement, on the surface is to invite everyone to play together, in fact, according to the rules of the United States, pulled out an exclusive "small circle", engaged in the "circle movement". this is in contrast to the international recognized "space treaty" in the spirit of "space is the common wealth of all mankind", is simply contrary.

The result is often unexpected.The U.S. blockade, but failed to block the way of others, instead became the strongest catalyst.It was because China was rejected by projects such as the International Space Station that it was determined to take a completely autonomous path on its own.

From the independent construction of the "Tiangong" space station, to the "Zhurong" rover leaving footprints on Mars, and then to the Chang'e lunar exploration project, one step at a time. In 2020, "Chang 'e-5" brought back 1,731 grams of lunar soil. By 2024, "Chang 'e-6" will successfully excavate and return from the far side of the moon where humans have never set foot. This series of achievements is the most powerful counterattack against the blockade.

The most interesting thing is the story surrounding the lunar soil, which is simply a miniature drama of power reversal. Time pulls back to 1978, when Sino-US relations broke the ice. The United States presented 1 gram of moon rock as a symbol of goodwill.That 1 gram represents the attitude of an era. Decades later, when China came back with 1,731 grams of lunar soil and opened research applications to scientists all over the world, including two American universities funded by NASA, the situation was completely different.

This time, China did not simply give it, but put forward clear conditions for cooperation: the research period is one year, data must be shared, published papers must be jointly signed, and samples are not allowed to be transferred. This is a kind of openness, but it is also a kind of self-confidence, a new attitude where the rules are set by me.

When the U.S. was busy closing its doors, other players in the world did not rest. The European Space Agency (ESA) has long been linked to China¡¯s projects, and the French scientific probe also landed on the moon with the Chang¡¯e 6. Even the UAE has expressed a strong interest in cooperation with the Sky Palace space station.

A new ¡°friend circle¡± of international cooperation bypassing the United States is silently forming. Former Director Jim Bridenstine has warned that if the United States continues to do so and excludes China, it will only force them to build a completely independent system.By then, the United States 'international allies may turn around and cooperate with China. What these words say is simply a rehearsal of reality. This wall may eventually encircle the United States itself.

Behind this "space wall" is actually the deep internal anxiety of the United States. It is afraid of losing its status and being surpassed. This fear has become a demon. Just listen to the remarks of NASA executives. The director publicly shouted that the United States must "defeat China" in the race to the moon.

At the time of the internal mobilization, Chief Executive Officer Daffy was more excited, saying that if China first landed on the moon, it would simply be "live and see ghosts". he also promised that the United States will definitely return to the moon "quickly and safely."This word, has completely distorted the space exploration of this matter, from the common cause of mankind, into a zero-sum game where you die and live.

Some members of Congress even embellished, exaggerating that there may be a Chinese "No Trespassing" sign on the moon in the future. There are also politicians who advocate building a nuclear reactor on the moon.This sentiment of grass-growing soldiers filled the whole public opinion atmosphere with a smell of fire, and Hardwin defined this as a "second space race".

But interestingly, the louder the scream outside, the more faltering the steps inside. The timetable of the "Artemis" manned moon landing program led by the United States has been pushed back again and again. The initial goal was 2024, but now it seems that it will have to wait until after 2026 at the earliest.

For more than half a century since the Apollo program, the United States has not sent astronauts to the moon.Why does this happen?The answer may not be in space, but in Washington.The endless dispute between the two parties in the United States has seriously delayed the progress of the space program.

During the Trump administration, for example, they cut space spending by 24% and this internal spending was the biggest obstacle to their return to the moon.In the end, all the anxiety and radical remarks point to one core: the struggle for future rules.

What they are worried about is that the potential resources on the moon, such as helium-3, which is regarded as the ultimate energy source in the future, will lose their dominance in the distribution. The deeper fear is that the United States has changed from worrying about being "copied homework" by others to worrying that others will start to "make their own questions and set their own rules". That's why they are in a hurry to "build a wall" and want to kick the most powerful competitor out before the game really starts.