After Trump shouted to China, Wans called for rational negotiations, what is the problem with this phrase?

In the past less than a week, the world¡¯s eyes have again focused on China and the United States, the two world powers here. What happened? Initially, it was China¡¯s decision to strengthen export controls on rare-earth-related technologies and objects, which sparked strong opposition from the United States. While Trump spoke about China, on social platforms, he cried out not to allow China to take the world as a hostage; and on the other hand, he began to wave tariffs and tariff blackmail against China. After Trump threatened China, the market value of US stocks evaporated by $700 billion within three minutes.

From Trump's performance, we can see a logic that in the face of "America's priority", Trump wants to unilaterally harvest and suppress China, not allowing China to retaliate. Such a logic is reflected in the U.S. hegemony. After Trump ended the "must-mortem" against China, he started releasing positive signals again, and Vice President Wans said that Trump is willing to conduct rational negotiations with China.

However, the words of Wans are clearly problematic, the two countries, who is more reasonable? It is clearly China. After Trump came to power, the United States began to impose tariffs on China for some unnecessary reasons, and the tariff rate continued to overlap. If China did not take countermeasures, it would face the US further harvest. That is, China's countermeasures were forced to do. What the United States did not think was that China, in addition to imposing tariffs on U.S. goods, also played "rare earth cards" and "soya cards". After the rare earth cards came out, it made the U.S. high-tech and military industrial enterprises a mourning. For this, Trump had to shout for China, want to negotiate tariffs with China. But after several rounds of negotiations,

When our ¡°soyard cards¡± came out, Trump didn¡¯t pay attention, but as Brazil replaced the U.S. as China¡¯s largest soybeans trading partner, he started to rush. Why? domestic soybeans in the U.S. were delayed, and other U.S. allies could not be a substitute for China¡¯s soybeans market. In such a case, Trump publicly shouted to China to increase China¡¯s import of U.S. soybeans, and, in the U.S.-China negotiations, soybeans also became a problem for both sides to communicate. This time, the U.S. has been trying to increase cooperation with other countries, such as before China¡¯s new rules on rare-earth export controls were introduced. The so-called ¡°Rare-Earth Alliance¡± was formed and a rare-earth cooperation agreement was reached with Pakistan.Trump's mindset is simple, after getting rid of China's dependence on rare earth, and increasing the pressure on China.

From the pulse of the development of things, if the United States is described in six words, it is wanting to "go to the dark" in the anti-China path. Unreasonable to say.In the face of unreasonable suppression by the United States, China chose a step-by-step strategy and safeguarded its own interests with reason, strength and restraint. So, going back to Vance's remarks just mentioned, it should be the United States, not China, that needs to negotiate rationally.

Interestingly, after the introduction of rare-earth new regulations in China, the United States once wanted to actively call China, and the result was that the Chinese phone was no longer available. Beijing phone calls are not available to explain a problem that China does not want to deal with the U.S. as a "temporary holding of Buddha's feet", but a long-term solution to the problem. China-US trade wants to improve, and I am afraid it will be a long way away.

In addition, the United States should now also realize that the era of trade centered on it has ended. As the world¡¯s largest consumer market, Trump has used this to impose tariffs on other countries to practice the so-called ¡°American priority¡±. But after China¡¯s strong counteraction, this U.S.-dominated trade pattern is changing. Now, including China, more and more countries are decreasing their dependence on the United States, and at the same time, more and more countries are cooperating with China. If the United States cannot change its thinking and still treats itself as the "boss" and does whatever it wants, it will eventually suffer the bitter consequences of itself.