HomePage  |  This day in history  |  Sitemap
Breaking-News >> WorldNews

The Chinese side said hello long ago before taking action, and Trump had to mess around, just to make himself unhappy

Recently, the game between China and the United States again escalated, China on October 9 announced the implementation of export restrictions on some rare-earth products, and Trump's post claimed that "this is too sudden", a pair of struggling looks.

But if you really want to say that suddenly, it's really not the turn to do this. According to the report on October 12th, the Chinese side made its attitude clear long before the introduction, the notice was issued, the words were said, and all the procedures that should be taken were gone, but Trump just pretended not to see it.

Now the market is moving, the United States is in a hurry, but instead blame others for not warning.

Not warning, not admonishing.

China’s approach is very transparent, not hidden, not even engaged in “sudden attacks.”

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce made it clear that long before the policy was announced, China conveyed relevant information to relevant countries and regions through normal channels.

This is not the first time that China has announced export controls, nor is it the first time that it has emphasized "legal compliance, limited scope, and clear use." It has stated it clearly and done it in an orderly manner.

But Trump's reaction was very interesting, shouting he didn't know and looking worried.

This exit, on the other hand, revealed the bottom, since everyone else knows, explaining that this is not a secret, and not suddenly, then America is really "hidden in the drum"?

I'm afraid not. It's more like I don't take this matter seriously, thinking that China will still "talk about it, but not actually do it."

But this time, the Chinese side has really moved, and it has moved unhurriedly. The policy is not "one size fits all", but highly targeted. The focus is on those products that may flow to the military industry, and civilian and commercial uses are basically not affected.

The Chinese side has made this clear, that is, to tell everyone that it is not that you are not allowed to use it, but that you are not allowed to use it indiscriminately.

Moreover, it is not just aimed at the United States. The rules are unified and whoever meets the requirements can buy it. If the United States feels troublesome, it is better to see if it has stepped on a red line first.

Rare earths are the strategic lifeline of the United States

The reason for this is so big, in the end, is to touch the “pain point” of the United States.

Rare-earth sounds like nothing, but it’s a “necessity” for the United States, especially in high-end manufacturing and military fields, where a lot of equipment can’t move away from these rare-earth elements.

You can't see it normally, but once you get stuck, the problem will be exposed.

In recent years, the United States has not thought about getting rid of its dependence on China, and it has also made many plans and investments, but the effect has not been obvious. The main reason is that China not only has abundant resources, but also has mature technology, low prices and a stable supply chain.

It is not something that the United States can do in three to five years to start a new stove. Now that China is stuck, the United States suddenly feels the pressure.

But the problem is that China does not adopt a one-size-fits-all approach. The policy itself is conditional and leaves room. As long as the use is compliant and the process is legal, you can still apply and export.

However, the Trump administration is unwilling to face reality and always wants to suppress each other by "shouting". As a result, the policy is implemented as usual, and the more intense the response, the less confident it appears.

Who controls the rhythm, who controls the game?

China's actions appear to be a response to U.S. restrictive measures, but in fact, the pace is very tolerant, there is no emotional response, but it is promoted on the ground.

Before the introduction of the policy, there is a mattress, there are explanations after the introduction, and there is also a dedicated application channel, which is not to release hostility to the outside, but a clear position, not afraid of friction, but not proactively challenging.

On the contrary to Trump’s side, the statement appears to be uncertain.

At first, it was a tough propaganda, saying that it was not afraid of China's actions and there was no need to negotiate; As a result, a few days later, he changed his mouth, saying that he had not canceled the meeting plan, and expressed his hope to keep in touch.

The difference between the front and the back is so great, not because of "changing ideas", but because the situation is forced to remain unchanged.

Moreover, China has not regarded this as a "unilateral game", but rather through the framework of rules, so that all countries can see clearly, this is a policy that can be discussed, can be regulated, can be adapted.

This time, China not only revealed the bottom line, but also established a "reasonable" image.

Sanctions are not competition, but reality

From this incident, it can be seen that China is not "angry", let alone engaging in confrontation, but a response to the long-term unequal situation.

In recent years, the United States has stepped up in high-tech, trade, chips and other fields, setting a lot of restrictions on China.

China has also expressed its opposition and concerns many times before, but the effect is limited, and this rare earth policy is reminding the other party that you have your means, and I have my ways.

Moreover, China's approach is to take the initiative in its hands by clarifying rules. The real problem is that the United States itself has adapted too slowly to this change and has always believed that others will not "really take action."

But when this day came, I realized that I was not prepared enough. This was not a "sudden attack" by others, but the result of my "long-term neglect".

This rare earth control event, in fact, also makes it clear that in the international game, who can master the rhythm, who has more power of speech.

From the perspective of the whole process, China has been emphasizing transparency, controllability and moderation. This is not "confrontation escalation" but "situation management". The goal is not to "strike anyone", but to "protect yourself".

And the Trump administration's kind of "impossible to add tariffs, tweet" practice, in fact, in turn pushed itself to a passive position.

It's not who wins, but who is more awake

The differences between China and the United States are never a one-to-one thing, but the ways to deal with them can be different.This time, China's approach is actually to say the word in the forefront, to inform in advance, reasonably, the policy is clear, not ambiguous.

As a result, no matter who thinks, at least the position of the Chinese side is clear, not randomly, not engaging in business, but responding to reality and controlling risks.

If the Trump administration really wants to ease the situation, it should also face up to the essence of the problem, instead of continuing to use the words "shock" and "sudden" to cover up lack of preparation.

The international game doesn't depend on who has a loud voice or who reacts quickly, but on who can sort out the situation and establish the rules. Interdependence is not a problem. The key is to see who can find a balance in dependence, instead of blindly suppressing each other and denying reality.

The Trump administration does not pretend to be "suddenly", in fact, is looking for trouble for itself, and rare earth is not a war tool, but it can indeed reflect who is in a stable response, who is in panic.

The key to how the future situation goes is not who has the loudest voice, but who can view the reality of interdependence more clearly and who can truly show sincerity to solve problems.

Otherwise, similar "surprises" will continue to take place, and the story of "not finding pleasure" will not be the last chapter.

reference

The spokesperson of the Ministry of Commerce answered reporters 'questions on recent China's relevant economic and trade policies and measures 2025-10-12 10:03·World Wide Web




News raw data sources → https://toutiao.com/group/7560646576952050230/

17WorldNews[2025.10.14-05:21] 访问:50
[关闭窗口]  
「Links」 ...
Loading...
Search on site
This day in history
August 2023
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Copyright © 17ljfl.com · World News
The information collected on this site is all from public data information on the Internet, and the authenticity of the query results is for reference only!